An SO(3)-equivariant reciprocal-space neural potential for long-range interactions
Organizations: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, China. · Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 999077, China. · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, 200232, China. · Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Abstract
Long-range electrostatic and polarization interactions play a central role in molecular and condensed-phase systems, yet remain fundamentally incompatible with locality-based machine-learning interatomic potentials. Although modern SO(3)-equivariant neural potentials achieve high accuracy for short-range chemistry, they cannot represent the anisotropic, slowly decaying multipolar correlations governing realistic materials, while existing long-range extensions either break SO(3) equivariance or fail to maintain energy-force consistency. Here we introduce EquiEwald, a unified neural interatomic potential that embeds an Ewald-inspired reciprocal-space formulation within an irreducible SO(3)-equivariant framework. By performing equivariant message passing in reciprocal space through learned equivariant k-space filters and an equivariant inverse transform, EquiEwald captures anisotropic, tensorial long-range correlations without sacrificing physical consistency. Across periodic and aperiodic benchmarks, EquiEwald captures long-range electrostatic behavior consistent with ab initio reference data and consistently improves energy and force accuracy, data efficiency, and long-range extrapolation. These results establish EquiEwald as a physically principled paradigm for long-range-capable machine-learning interatomic potentials.
Figures & tables
| Model | Test Energy (MAE) | Test Force (MAE) |
|---|---|---|
| eSCN ( Passaro and Zitnick, 2023 ) | 193.9 | 23.1 |
| eSCN+EwaldMP (scalar) ( Kosmala et al., 2023 ) | 132.8 | 20.3 |
| eSCN+EquiEwald | 109.0 | 18.1 |
| Model | Test(Evaluation) Energy | Test(Evaluation) Force |
|---|---|---|
| eSCN ( Passaro and Zitnick, 2023 ) | 347.0 | 24.7 |
| eSCN+EquiEwald | 321.2 | 24.1 |
| EquiformerV2 ( Liao et al., 2023 ) | 541.0 | 46.4 |
| EquiformerV2+EquiEwald | 453.0 | 38.4 |