GEAR: Geography-knowledge Enhanced Analog Recognition Framework in Extreme Environments
Organizations: Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Abstract
The Mariana Trench and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau exhibit significant similarities in geological origins and microbial metabolic functions. Given that deep-sea biological sampling faces prohibitive costs, recognizing structurally homologous terrestrial analogs of the Mariana Trench on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is of great significance. Yet, no existing model adequately addresses cross-domain topographic similarity retrieval, either neglecting geographical knowledge or sacrificing computational efficiency. To address these challenges, we present Geography-knowledge Enhanced Analog Recognition (GEAR) Framework, a three-stage pipeline designed to efficiently retrieve analogs from 2.5 million square kilometers of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: (1) Skeleton guided Screening and Clipping: Recognition of candidate valleys and initial screening based on size and linear morphological criteria. (2) Physics aware Filtering: The Topographic Waveform Comparator (TWC) and Morphological Texture Module (MTM) evaluate the waveform and texture and filter out inconsistent candidate valleys. (3) Graph based Fine Recognition: We design a Morphology-integrated Siamese Graph Network (MSG-Net) based on geomorphological metrics. Correspondingly, we release an expert-annotated topographic similarity dataset targeting tectonic collision zones. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of every stage. Besides, MSG-Net achieved an F1-Score 1.38 percentage points higher than the SOTA baseline. Using features extracted by MSG-Net, we discovered a significant correlation with biological data, providing evidence for future biological analysis.
Figures & tables
| Category | Method | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1-Score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional ML | RF | 64.87 0.94 | 66.58 1.51 | 64.87 0.94 | 61.93 1.21 |
| SVM | 63.18 0.65 | 56.93 1.40 | 63.18 0.66 | 56.67 0.83 | |
| PCA-EPFs | 68.45 1.02 | 69.12 1.33 | 66.83 1.15 | 67.95 1.24 | |
| Deep Learning | 2D-CNN | 73.52 1.15 | 70.15 1.48 | 78.31 1.22 | 73.98 1.30 |
| MLP-CNNs | 74.81 1.20 | 71.33 1.52 | 80.14 1.18 | 75.47 1.35 | |
| ResNet50 | 77.63 1.11 | 75.88 1.41 | 82.05 1.09 | 78.84 1.25 |
| Model Variant | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Features | 0.8393 | 0.7665 | 0.9805 | 0.8604 |
| w/o Con_dense | 0.7391 | 0.6571 | 1.0000 | 0.7931 |
| w/o VRM | 0.6522 | 0.5946 | 0.9565 | 0.7333 |
| w/o ACR | 0.6304 | 0.5750 | 1.0000 | 0.7302 |
| w/o Slope | 0.6739 | 0.6250 | 0.8696 | 0.7273 |
| w/o Entropy | 0.6522 | 0.5549 | 0.9565 | 0.7024 |