Large language models frequently exhibit suboptimal performance on low resource languages, primarily due to inefficient subword segmentation and systemic training data imbalances. In this paper, we propose Variable Entropy Policy Optimization (VEPO), which leverages Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards to incorporate deterministic structural constraints into the policy alignment process. This framework ensures prescribed sequence length, robust format consistency, and rigorous linguistic well formedness, all enforced during training. Central to our approach is a variable entropy mechanism that enables the model to dynamically calibrate the equilibrium between literal fidelity and semantic naturalness by modulating the exploration exploitation manifold. By integrating entropy tempered advantage estimation with asymmetric clipping, VEPO sustains robust exploration while mitigating policy collapse. Empirical evaluations across 90 FLORES-200, COMET-22, chrF directions demonstrate that VEPO yields substantial improvements in both tokenization efficiency and translation quality, bridging the performance gap for underrepresented languages.
Figures & tables
Figure 1
Figure 1: Comparison of translation quality assessment across different models.
Model
Lang.
Length
Format
Mixing
Overall
VEPO-7B (Ours)
97.8
99.2
92.15
92.3
95.3
Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
92.0
97.0
51.8
62.8
75.9
Gemma3-27B-IT
97.4
91.6
42.1
90.9
80.5
Qwen-MT-Plus
97.6
99.8
82.5
94.8
93.6
Seed-X-PPO-7B
97.6
79.8
79.0
90.3
86.6
DeepSeek-V3
95.4
95.7
67.6
95.0
88.4
Table 1: Constraint verification performance (%). Our model (top) consistently achieves superior alignment across deterministic structural constraints.
Figure 2: Policy entropy dynamics across RL algorithms and KL regimes.
Figure 3: Response length stability across six RL algorithms and three KL regimes (18 independent runs).
Figure 4: Sensitivity analysis of explicit length penalties. External constraints induce reward instability and entropy oscillations, leading to training divergence.
Figure 5: Results of pairwise ranking comparisons from professional human evaluations of translation samples.
Figure 6: Overall translation performance comparison (Avg.) on FLORES-200 across sacreBLEU, COMET, and chrF metrics.
Model
X → E
E → X
X → X
Avg.
Multilingual Chat Models
Gemma3-27B-IT
36.8/.882/62.9
30.7/.875/54.2
22.3/.847/47.5
24.7/.854/49.7
Qwen3-8B
31.1/.862/58.5
23.3/.799/46.4
14.4/.752/36.8
16.9/.767/39.9
Qwen2.5-7B-Inst.
24.8/.498/19.4
17.4/.455/15.6
9.2/.449/14.5
11.6/.454/15.1
Apertus-8B-Inst.
32.5/.870/60.5
25.7/.802/46.6
15.6/.750/36.9
18.3/.767/40.2
Tower-Plus-9B
28.2/.825/54.7
18.3/.671/37.7
9.8/.615/29.3
12.5/.641/32.7
Table 2: Performance on FLORES-200, COMET-22, chrF
Model
BBH
CMMLU
HellaS.
MMLU
Multilingual Chat Models
Gemma3-27B-IT
55.9
55.9
55.9
56.0
Qwen3-8B
63.8
60.8
26.0
51.3
Qwen2.5-7B-Inst.
54.4
64.1
85.2
40.9
Apertus-8B-Inst.
49.2
45.3
64.2
45.2
Tower-Plus-9B
40.4
57.2
73.1
42.1
Table 3: General reasoning benchmarks (%). Red : baseline.
Figure 7: Token level logit distribution comparison at a critical decision point. VEPO reactivates the paraphrastic manifold, allowing the model to explore refined linguistic mappings that are suppressed by mode collapse in the base SFT model.
Table 5: BLEU scores per source–target language pair.
Source
Target
Model COMET Scores
Gem3
SeedX
QwenMT
Huny
VEPO
Qw2.5
Qw3
Apert
Aya
Emma
LLa3.1
LLaX3
Mistr
Tower
Google
NLLB
Thai
Malay
0.8774
0.876
0.877
0.8729
0.8741
0.5088
0.8537
0.8627
0.7755
0.4776
0.7004
0.8471
0.5788
0.7917
0.8481
0.8572
Thai
Khmer
0.7952
0.4917
0.7807
0.8126
0.8245
0.3895
0.6391
0.5416
0.3694
0.7217
0.5474
0.6985
0.4164
0.3355
0.7682
0.7884
Thai
Lao
0.8223
0.51
0.7957
0.6894
0.8409
0.3552
0.6412
0.5743
0.3659
0.5655
0.5892
0.6166
0.3353
0.4796
0.7615
0.8295
Thai
Burmese
0.8373
0.4567
0.8487
0.8498
0.8673
0.4155
0.6412
0.7807
0.3781
0.7714
0.5436
0.6405
0.388
0.3276
0.7535
0.8205
Thai
Filipino
0.8401
0.655
0.8298
0.8244
0.8353
0.4611
0.7514
0.8136
0.5903
0.5316
0.7156
0.7974
0.5538
0.6924
0.749
0.819
Appendix
Table 6: COMET scores per source–target language pair.
Source
Target
Model chrF Scores
Gem3
SeedX
QwenMT
Huny
VEPO
Qw2.5
Qw3
Apert
Aya
Emma
LLa3.1
LLaX3
Mistr
Tower
Google
NLLB
Thai
Malay
58.31
57.57
55.44
55.74
57.95
23.09
51.79
53.82
42.32
6.43
4.89
50.21
35.48
48.86
58.05
57.71
Thai
Khmer
36.93
2.85
34.34
39.40
42.28
13.25
28.35
15.82
11.60
35.03
18.45
30.47
1.76
11.74
41.98
41.85
Thai
Lao
45.85
4.08
41.23
2.48
48.60
11.28
31.41
18.32
10.51
2.03
4.79
27.54
3.21
9.20
46.82
48.23
Thai
Burmese
39.40
0.71
42.25
44.15
46.55
17.47
29.83
36.38
10.15
31.80
16.20
25.48
15.08
11.84
44.23
44.18
Thai
Filipino
54.12
18.07
49.96
51.67
53.14
23.36
44.68
49.49
36.54
14.57
31.06
46.40
32.88
41.20
48.17
53.69
Appendix
Table 7: chrF scores per source–target language pair.
Role
Utterance
System
You are a helpful assistant.
User
Please translate the following sentence into English: Cho ngap phai ruoi
AssistantA
By sheer chance.
Appendix
Table 8: Example conversation showing four different translation approaches: idiomatic, literal, explanatory, and noisy outputs in response to the same Vietnamese idiom.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability in machine translation on high-resource language pairs, yet their performance on low-resource translation still lags behind. Existing post-training methods rely heavily on high-quality parallel data, which are often scarce or unavailable for low-resource languages. In this paper, we introduce WALAR, a reinforcement training method using only monolingual text to elevate LLMs' translation capabilities on massive low-resource languages while retaining their performance on high-resource languages. Our key insight is based on the observation of failure modes (or "holes") in existing source-based multilingual quality estimation (QE) models. Reinforcement learning (RL) using these QE models tends to amplify such holes, resulting in poorer multilingual LLMs. We develop techniques including word alignment and language alignment to mitigate such holes in WALAR's reward for RL training. We continually trained an LLM supporting translation of 101 languages using WALAR. The experiments show that our new model outperforms LLaMAX, one of the strongest open-source multilingual LLMs by a large margin on 1400 language directions on Flores-101 dataset.
Extending large language models (LLMs) to low-resource languages often incurs an "alignment tax": improvements in the target language come at the cost of catastrophic forgetting in general capabilities. We argue that this trade-off arises from the rigidity of supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which enforces token-level surface imitation on narrow and biased data distributions. To address this limitation, we propose a semantic-space alignment paradigm powered by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), where the model is optimized using embedding-level semantic rewards rather than likelihood maximization. This objective encourages meaning preservation through flexible realizations, enabling controlled updates that reduce destructive interference with pretrained knowledge. We evaluate our approach on Tibetan-Chinese machine translation and Tibetan headline generation. Experiments show that our method acquires low-resource capabilities while markedly mitigating alignment tax, preserving general competence more effectively than SFT. Despite producing less rigid surface overlap, semantic RL yields higher semantic quality and preference in open-ended generation, and few-shot transfer results indicate that it learns more transferable and robust representations under limited supervision. Overall, our study demonstrates that reinforcement learning with semantic rewards provides a safer and more reliable pathway for inclusive low-resource language expansion.
Zeli Su, Ziyin Zhang, Zhou Liu +7
Minzu University of China · Ant Group · Shanghai Jiao Tong University +4
Adapting pretrained language models to low-resource, morphologically rich languages remains a significant challenge. Existing vocabulary expansion methods typically rely on arbitrarily segmented subword units, resulting in fragmented lexical representations and loss of critical morphological information. To address this limitation, we propose the Lexically Grounded Subword Embedding Initialization (LGSE) framework, which introduces morphologically informed segmentation for initializing embeddings of novel tokens. Instead of using random vectors or arbitrary subwords, LGSE decomposes words into their constituent morphemes and constructs semantically coherent embeddings by averaging pretrained subword or FastText-based morpheme representations. When a token cannot be segmented into meaningful morphemes, its embedding is constructed using character n-gram representations to capture structural information. During Language-Adaptive Pretraining, we apply a regularization term that penalizes large deviations of newly introduced embeddings from their initialized values, preserving alignment with the original pretrained embedding space while enabling adaptation to the target language. To isolate the effect of initialization, we retain the original pre-trained model vocabulary and tokenizer and update only the new embeddings during adaptation. We evaluate LGSE on three NLP tasks: Question Answering, Named Entity Recognition, and Text Classification, in two morphologically rich, low-resource languages: Amharic and Tigrinya, where morphological segmentation resources are available. Experimental results show that LGSE consistently outperforms baseline methods across all tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of morphologically grounded embedding initialization for improving representation quality in underrepresented languages. Project resources are available in the GitHub link.
Hailay Teklehaymanot, Dren Fazlija, Wolfgang Nejdl