Recent Deep Neural Networks (DNN) applications ask for techniques that can explain their behavior. Existing solutions, such as Feature Guided Analysis (FGA), extract rules on their internal behaviors, e.g., by providing explanations related to neurons activation. Results from the literature show that these rules have considerable precision (i.e., they correctly predict certain classes of features), but the recall (i.e., the number of situations these rule apply) is more limited. To mitigate this problem, this paper presents Ensembles-based Feature Guided Analysis (EFGA). EFGA combines rules extracted by FGA into ensembles. Ensembles aggregate different rules to increase their applicability depending on an aggregation criterion, a policy that dictates how to combine rules into ensembles. Although our solution is extensible, and different aggregation criteria can be developed by users, in this work, we considered three different aggregation criteria. We evaluated how the choice of the criterion influences the effectiveness of EFGA on two benchmarks (i.e., the MNIST and LSC datasets), and found that different aggregation criteria offer alternative trade-offs between precision and recall. We then compare EFGA with FGA. For this experiment, we selected an aggregation criterion that provides a reasonable trade-off between precision and recall. Our results show that EFGA has higher train recall (+28.51% on MNIST, +33.15% on LSC), and test recall (+25.76% on MNIST, +30.81% on LSC) than FGA, with a negligible reduction on the test precision (-0.89% on MNIST, -0.69% on LSC).
Figures & tables
Activation
Digit 1
Line
[0.34,−1.23,0.17,...]
1
0
[0.42,−0.87,0.55,...]
0
1
⋮
⋮
⋮
[3.12,3.11,1.31,...]
1
0
TABLE I : Example of dataset D ′ structured like the ones of FGA.
Fig. 1 : Overview of Feature Guided Analysis.
Fig. 2 : Example of decision tree structured like the ones from FGA and EFGA.
Listing 1: Pseudocode for Feature Guided Analysis.
Neural network interpretability studies how models represent information and make predictions, and how to explain, test, or control their internal computations.
Kim Jaechul Graduate School of AI, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea · INEEJI, Seongnam, Korea · KAIST InnoCORE LLM, KAIST, Daejeon, Korea