Human-Inspired Pavlovian and Instrumental Learning for Autonomous Agent Navigation
Organizations: WiLab, University of Bologna, via dell’Università 50, 47521 Cesena, Italy · National Research Council of Italy (CNR), viale del Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy · University of Bologna, Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, 47521 Cesena, Italy
Abstract
Autonomous agents operating in uncertain environments must balance fast responses with goal-directed planning. Classical MF RL often converges slowly and may induce unsafe exploration, whereas MB methods are computationally expensive and sensitive to model mismatch. This paper presents a human-inspired hybrid RL architecture integrating Pavlovian, Instrumental MF, and Instrumental MB components. Inspired by Pavlovian and Instrumental learning from neuroscience, the framework considers contextual radio cues, here intended as georeferenced environmental features acting as CS, to shape intrinsic value signals and bias decision-making. Learning is further modulated by internal motivational drives through a dedicated motivational signal. A Bayesian arbitration mechanism adaptively blends MF and MB estimates based on predicted reliability. Simulation results show that the hybrid approach accelerates learning, improves operational safety, and reduces navigation in high-uncertainty regions compared to standard RL baselines. Pavlovian conditioning promotes safer exploration and faster convergence, while arbitration enables a smooth transition from exploration to efficient, plan-driven exploitation. Overall, the results highlight the benefits of biologically inspired modularity for robust and adaptive autonomous systems under uncertainty.
Figures & tables
| Acronym | Meaning |
|---|---|
| NS | Neutral Stimulus |
| CS | Conditioned Stimulus |
| US | Unconditioned Stimulus |
| UR | Unconditioned Response |
| CR | Conditioned Response |
| PIT | Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer |
| Pavlovian learning (neuroscience) | Description | In this paper |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral Stimulus (NS) | State with no intrinsic value, that is, before association they are not linked with task outcomes. | GPS-denied regions Gates These contextual radio features, before association , are not initially associated with task outcomes. |
| Unconditioned Stimulus (US) | Task-relevant outcome signal. | Target localization metrics, such as the position error bound (PEB), depend on various factors. Among them, we focus on: Agents’ position accuracy, LOS propagation conditions. |
| Conditioned Stimulus (CS) | Predictive state acquired through learning. | When GPS-denied regions and gates are considered validated contextual radio-cues predictive of outcomes learned from association: GPS-denied regions anticipate uncertainty on agents’ positions and, thus, decreased PEB Gates anticipate LOS propagation and, thus, improved PEB |
| Unconditioned Response (UR) | Immediate reflexive response to reinforcement. | Instantaneous value update driven by reward-based temporal-difference error. |
| Conditioned Response (CR) | Automatic, stimulus-driven behavioral bias. | GPS-denied region: avoidance tendency induced by Pavlovian values through action-dependent policy modulation. Gates: approach tendency induced by Pavlovian values through action-dependent policy modulation. |
| Parameter | Description | Value |
| Learning rate: | ||
| Initial value | 0.55 | |
| Decay rate | 0.9985 | |
| Final value | 0.09 | |
| Discount factor | 0.98 | |
| Temperature: |
Reinforcement Learning
Reinforcement learning studies how agents learn sequential decisions from rewards and interaction, balancing exploration, performance, safety, and adaptation.
See all 1,661 papers