Bridging neuroscience and AI: adaptive, culturally sensitive technologies transforming aphasia rehabilitation

While language therapy is the primary treatment for post-stroke aphasia, limited clinical resources often restrict patient access to proper care. Addressing this gap requires reliable training simulations for medical professionals. However, current AI efforts focus almost exclusively on speech processing, leaving speech generation largely unexplored. This study introduces AphaVoice, a novel text-to-speech (TTS) framework explicitly engineered to synthesize highly realistic aphasic speech. Evaluated against state-of-the-art TTS systems, AphaVoice demonstrates a superior ability to capture the clinical feature of dysfluency, outperforming existing models in temporal metrics while consistently maintaining speaker identity. By leveraging latent space shifting, the model also supports multi-speaker generation without sacrificing phonetic realism. Ultimately, AphaVoice provides a scalable, high-fidelity tool for medical training and clinical simulation related to aphasia.

Speech and language technologies have expanded access to communication, but the support they provide is often fixed. The same linguistic or visual aid may help one user and hinder another, or become less useful as task demands change. This project proposes a framework for adapting language presentation to individual abilities and ongoing interaction. It separates access to a message from the estimation of user needs and from the selection of support, including sentence segmentation, pictograms, and optional spoken output. Behavioral feedback provides the primary evidence for adaptation; electroencephalography is considered an additional, uncertainty-aware source of information rather than a direct measure of comprehension. We specify a staged evaluation comparing fixed, behavior-adaptive, and neuroadaptive interfaces. The central question is whether neural information improves comprehension and communication efficiency beyond a strong behavioral baseline.

Aphasia following stroke commonly produces systematic naming errors with characteristic profiles, but whether general-purpose language models not designed for clinical simulation can reproduce these patterns remains untested. We investigated (1) whether lesions or controlled perturbations to a multimodal language model can reproduce different types of errors in picture naming, and (2) whether the framework can reproduce the complete error profile of individual persons with aphasia (PWAs). Using LLaVA 1.6, we evaluated perturbation configurations that varied the layer, proportion, and amount of noise applied to model units. We examined 278 PWAs on the Philadelphia Naming Test, classifying responses into seven categories using a validated neural classifier. Six of seven response categories (correct, semantic, mixed, unrelated, neologism, no response errors) emerged at clinically-comparable proportions across distinct parameter space regions, with formal paraphasia being the exception. Searching the perturbation space revealed configurations that reproduced the individual error profile in at least six of seven categories for 97.8% of PWAs and in all seven categories for 79.5% of PWAs. Monte Carlo baselines confirmed that this matching reflects joint inter-category structure rather than marginal overlap. These results establish a quantitative framework for reproducing individual aphasic error patterns in picture naming. They suggest the potential for language models to serve as digital twins of individuals with post-stroke aphasia.