Quality Over Clicks: Iterative Reinforcement Learning for Early-Stage E-Commerce Query Suggestion
Organizations: Alibaba International Digital Commercial Group
Abstract
Existing dialogue systems rely on query suggestion to enhance user engagement. Recent approaches mainly optimize generative models using click-through rate (CTR) models to align with user preferences. However, these methods are less effective in early-stage deployment scenarios, where click feedback is sparse and insufficient for training a reliable CTR model. To bridge this gap, we propose QualEQS, a quality-first iterative reinforcement learning framework for e-commerce query suggestion. We formalize actionable suggestion quality along three dimensions that directly affect downstream usability: answerability, factuality, and information gain. To continuously improve from online traffic without click supervision, we further propose group-level disagreement among candidate suggestions to identify ambiguous query contexts and mine hard training cases for iterative refinement. We also introduce EQS-Benchmark, a dataset of 16,949 real-world e-commerce queries for offline training and evaluation. Experiments show that our quality-based offline metrics correlate strongly with online performance, providing a practical evaluation recipe for sparse-feedback deployment. In both offline and online settings, QualEQS consistently outperforms strong baselines, yielding a 6.81% improvement in online ChatPV in a real-world enterprise-level conversational shopping assistant system.
Figures & tables
| Models | Strict Accuracy | Valid Rate | Fine-grained Quality Accuracy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answerable | Factuality | Informativeness | |||
| Closed-Source Large Language Models | |||||
| Gemini-2.5-flash | 38.9 ± 2.4 | 55.0 ± 1.8 | 63.2 ± 0.7 | 85.0 ± 0.8 | 77.0 ± 0.8 |
| Gemini-3-flash | 56.0 ± 1.6 | 62.9 ± 1.2 | 64.2 ± 1.2 | 77.4 ± 1.6 | 75.8 ± 1.8 |
| Gpt-4o-mini | 34.9 ± 0.6 | 53.0 ± 0.8 | 60.6 ± 0.7 | 99.3 ± 0.1 | 92.0 ± 0.2 |
| GPT-4.1-mini | 70.5 ± 1.0 | 79.2 ± 0.5 | 84.9 ± 0.3 | 99.0 ± 0.3 | 94.3 ± 0.3 |
| Models | Strict Accuracy | Valid Rate |
|---|---|---|
| QualEQS | 86.1 ± 0.7 | 90.6 ± 0.4 |
| w/o disagreement | 81.6 ± 0.9 | 88.4 ± 0.5 |
| SFT-Qwen3-4B | 50.5 ± 0.2 | 68.8 ± 0.3 |
| w/o mix ratio | 46.6 ± 2.0 | 66.1 ± 1.1 |
RL for IR
Reinforcement learning for information retrieval (IR) optimizes query, ranking, and retrieval policies from task and interaction feedback.
See all 51 papers