Accurate forecasting of multivariate time series remains challenging due to the need to capture both short-term fluctuations and long-range temporal dependencies. Transformer-based models have emerged as a powerful approach, but their performance depends critically on the representation of temporal data. Traditional point-wise representations preserve individual time-step information, enabling fine-grained modeling, yet they tend to be computationally expensive and less effective at modeling broader contextual dependencies, limiting their scalability to long sequences. Patch-wise representations aggregate consecutive steps into compact tokens to improve efficiency and model local temporal dynamics, but they often discard fine-grained temporal details that are critical for accurate predictions in volatile or complex time series. We propose IPatch, a multi-resolution Transformer architecture that integrates both point-wise and patch-wise tokens, modeling temporal information at multiple resolutions. Experiments on 7 benchmark datasets demonstrate that IPatch consistently improves forecasting accuracy, robustness to noise, and generalization across various prediction horizons compared to single-representation baselines.
Figures & tables
Datasets
Horizon
PatchTST (with overlapping)
PatchTST (w/o overlapping)
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
ILI
24
1.963( ▲+6.72% )
0.878( ▲+6.50% )
2.095
0.939
36
1.981( ▼−1.00% )
0.898( ▲+0.33% )
1.961
0.901
48
2.022( ▲+0.19% )
0.935( ▲+1.54% )
2.026
0.949
60
1.991( ▼−3.61% )
0.924( ▼−0.86% )
1.919
0.916
Electricity
96
0.200( ▲+2% )
0.288( ▲+1.73% )
0.204
0.293
Table 1: Performance of PatchTST with/without overlapping patches across various datasets and horizons. Best scores are in bold blue, underlined values denote equal performance. Blue indicates gains, and red indicates losses relative to baseline.
Figure 1: (a) The proposed dual-stream architecture. The input sequence X=(xi,j)1≤i≤L,1≤j≤M is first divided into N patches and combined with positional encoding. It is then passed into a Transformer Encoder block for patch attention and an Autocorrelation block for inner-patch autocorrelation. The outputs of both blocks are concatenated and flattened, then passed through a Linear layer to generate the final prediction X^=(x^i,j)L+1≤i≤L+H,1≤j≤M . (b) Detailed view of the Transformer Encoder attention and the Autocorrelation block.
Datasets
Weather
Electricity
ILI
ETTh1
ETTh2
ETTm1
ETTm2
Features (M)
21
321
7
7
7
7
7
Timesteps
52696
26304
966
17420
17420
69680
69680
Table 2: Description of the datasets used in the experiments.
Model
IPatch (Ours)
TimeMixer
PatchTST
TimesNet
Crossformer
MICN
FiLM
DLinear
FEDformer
Stationary
Autoformer
Informer
Metric
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
ILI
24
1.604( ▲+9,17% )
0.751( ▲+12,38% )
1.766
0.844
1.963
0.878
2.616
1.079
3.197
1.149
2.341
1.038
2.223
0.986
2.203
1.036
2.565
1.080
2.301
1.035
2.651
1.114
3.179
1.278
36
1.689( ▲+5,50% )
0.799( ▲+9,38% )
1.782
0.874
1.981
0.898
2.030
0.945
3.653
1.264
2.339
1.052
2.155
0.997
2.323
1.076
3.099
1.227
2.109
1.004
2.651
1.114
2.788
1.125
48
1.562( ▲+19,91% )
0.783( ▲+15,58% )
1.873
0.905
2.022
0.935
2.032
0.917
3.903
1.317
2.437
1.068
2.144
1.011
2.436
1.146
3.183
1.239
2.477
1.094
2.846
1.146
2.942
1.160
60
1.445( ▲+24,84% )
0.783( ▲+12,26% )
1.804
0.910
1.991
0.924
1.836
0.879
4.695
1.451
2.260
0.996
2.003
0.936
2.305
1.088
2.706
1.109
2.429
1.086
2.716
1.128
3.024
1.166
Electricity
96
0.153( ▶+0% )
0.239( ▲+3,34% )
0.153
0.247
0.200
0.288
0.168
0.272
0.219
0.314
0.180
0.293
0.198
0.274
0.210
0.302
0.193
0.308
0.169
0.273
0.201
0.317
0.274
0.368
Table 3: Long-term Forcasting : Unified Look-back of 96, with horizon ∈{96,192,336,720} for Electricity, Weather & ETT, ILI horizon is set ∈{24,36,48,60} Bold results are the best outcomes, underlined are second best.
Figure 2: Visual comparison of 96-step forecasts on the Electricity dataset. IPatch (red) tracks the ground truth (black) with markedly higher fidelity than PatchTST, TimeMixer, Crossformer, and DLinear.
Figure 3: Predictive effectiveness vs efficiency on ILI dataset (forecast horizon 60). IPatch (red circle) offers the best performance-efficiency tradeoff among all evaluated architectures
Datasets
Horizon
IPatch (Ours)
Patch only
Autocorrelation only
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
ILI
24
1.604
0.751
1.977
0.873
1.790
0.805
36
1.689
0.799
1.886
0.882
1.875
0.848
48
1.562
0.783
1.662
0.809
1.636
0.800
60
1.445
0.789
1.839
0.952
1.711
0.870
Electricity
96
0.153
0.239
0.162
0.246
0.154
0.241
Table 4: Ablation study of patching and point-wise autocorrelation integration. Blue bold results are the best outcomes, underlined are second best.
Datasets
Horizon
IPatch (Fourrier)
IPatch (softmax)
MSE
MAE
MSE
MAE
ILI
24
1.604
0.751
1.739
0.806
36
1.689
0.799
1.644
0.798
48
1.562
0.783
1.635
0.806
60
1.445
0.789
1.569
0.788
Electricity
96
0.153
0.239
0.153
0.245
Table 5: Ablation study of the final activation function. Blue bold results are the best outcomes.
Appendix figures & tables1 asset
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 4: Qualitative comparison of forecasting models (IPatch, TimeMixer, Crossformer, DLinear, and PatchTST) on different datasets. IPatch shows consistently stronger temporal modeling across diverse time series characteristics.
Transformer-based time series foundation models face a fundamental trade-off in choice of tokenization: point-wise embeddings preserve temporal fidelity but scale poorly with sequence length, whereas fixed-length patching improves efficiency by imposing uniform boundaries that may disrupt natural transitions and blur informative local dynamics. In order to address these limitations, we introduce TimeSqueeze, a dynamic patching mechanism that adaptively selects patch boundaries within each sequence based on local signal complexity. TimeSqueeze first applies a lightweight state-space encoder to extract full-resolution point-wise features, then performs content-aware segmentation by allocating short patches to information-dense regions and long patches to smooth or redundant segments. This variable-resolution compression preserves critical temporal structure while substantially reducing the token sequence presented to the Transformer backbone. Specifically for large-scale pretraining, TimeSqueeze attains up to 20x faster convergence and 8x higher data efficiency compared to equivalent point-token baselines. Experiments across long-horizon forecasting benchmarks show that TimeSqueeze consistently outperforms comparable architectures that use either point-wise tokenization or fixed-size patching.
Sravan Kumar Ankireddy, Nikita Seleznev, Nam H. Nguyen +4
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA · Capital One, USA · University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Transformer-based models have emerged as leading paradigms in time-series forecasting in recent years, employing self-attention mechanisms to capture long-range dependencies. Despite their success, these single-stage forecasting architectures exhibit persistent systematic residual biases arising from structural discrepancies, unmodeled stochastic components, or inadequate multi-scale temporal representations. This limitation persists when residuals are treated as irreducible noise, precluding adaptive correction of structured error patterns. To address this limitation, we introduce a two-stage, model-agnostic framework that explicitly decouples forecasting and residual learning into distinct stages of representation learning. A base transformer first generates the initial predictions. Subsequently, a dedicated meta-corrector dynamically models structured error patterns across multivariate channels, preserves cross-variable dependencies, and iteratively refines the residual bias of the base transformer. By formalizing this pipeline as a hypothesis space expansion, our framework addresses approximation limitations inherent in single-stage architectures, removes reliance on restrictive assumptions, and enables end-to-end learning of complex error dynamics. Evaluated on eight popular benchmark datasets using established protocols, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance, with significant improvements in standard metrics (MSE, MAE). The results demonstrate the framework's ability to mitigate systematic biases and enhance robustness to complex temporal dynamics, advancing the practical applicability of transformer-based forecasting models.
Amrijit Biswas, Mustafa Kamal, Robin Krambroeckers +4
Artificial Intelligence Department, RobotBulls Labs Geneva, Switzerland · Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University Dhaka, Bangladesh
Multivariate time series forecasting (MTSF) is a fundamental task in many real world applications. Existing patch based forecasting methods generally fall into three categories: fixed partitioning, multi-scale partitioning, and extendable partitioning. Fixed partitioning often breaks meaningful temporal boundaries, multi-scale partitioning may introduce redundant representations across scales, and extendable partitioning improves flexibility but still lacks an explicit mechanism for organizing semantic structure and modeling interactions among heterogeneous temporal patterns. To address these limitations, we propose SCPaT, a Transformer based framework built on semantic structured partitioning. SCPaT first decomposes input sequences into semantically consistent units through adaptive semantic unit generation, then constructs a dynamic semantic graph to model directed dependencies among these units and organize them into higher order semantic blocks. Based on these structured representations, an importance aware routing mechanism adaptively dispatches different semantic blocks to different experts for customized modeling. Extensive experiments on 12 real world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of SCPaT.
Zhiquan Huang, Jiazhe Wang, Linjing Xue +3
School of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471023, Henan, China · School of Software, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471000, Henan, China