Causal AI For AMS Circuit Design: Interpretable Parameter Effects Analysis
Organizations: University of Florida
Abstract
Analog-mixed-signal (AMS) circuits are highly non-linear and operate on continuous real-world signals, making them far more difficult to model with data-driven AI than digital blocks. To close the gap between structured design data (device dimensions, bias voltages, etc.) and real-world performance, we propose a causal-inference framework that first discovers a directed-acyclic graph (DAG) from SPICE simulation data and then quantifies parameter impact through Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimation. The approach yields human-interpretable rankings of design knobs and explicit 'what-if' predictions, enabling designers to understand trade-offs in sizing and topology. We evaluate the pipeline on three operational-amplifier families (OTA, telescopic, and folded-cascode) implemented in TSMC 65nm and benchmark it against a baseline neural-network (NN) regressor. Across all circuits the causal model reproduces simulation-based ATEs with an average absolute error of less than 25%, whereas the neural network deviates by more than 80% and frequently predicts the wrong sign. These results demonstrate that causal AI provides both higher accuracy and explainability, paving the way for more efficient, trustworthy AMS design automation.
Figures & tables
| Parameter | Simulation Data ATE | (%) Diff. with Causal ATE | (%) Diff. with NN ATE |
| Idc | -0.313 | 4.47% | -227.8% |
| W_DP | 0.1 | 70% | -40% |
| W_PMOS | 0.23 | -26% | -130.4% |
| W_CM | -0.07 | 0% | 100% |
| L | 0.46 | 28.26% | -60.87% |
| Avg. of Absolute Values | 25.75% | 111.81% | |
| Parameter | Simulation Data ATE | (%) Diff. with Causal ATE | (%) Diff. with NN ATE |
| Idc | -0.93 | 0% | -221.5% |
| W_DP | -0.65 | 9.23% | 29.23% |
| W_PMOS | 1.84 | -35.33% | -65.22% |
| W_CM | -0.25 | 16% | 20% |
| L | -0.8 | 60% | 93.75% |
| Avg. of Absolute Values | 24.11% | 85.94% | |
| Parameter | Simulation Data ATE | (%) Diff. with Causal ATE | (%) Diff. with NN ATE |
| Idc | -0.45 | -6.67% | 811.11% |
| W_DP | 0.27 | 18.52% | -170.37% |
| W_PMOS | 0.19 | -5.26% | -63.16% |
| W_NML | -0.18 | -3.89% | 33.33% |
| L | -0.28 | -3.57% | 110.71% |
| Avg. of Absolute Values | 7.58% | 237.73% | |
Electronic Design Automation
Electronic Design Automation uses algorithms and software to design, verify, optimize, and manufacture electronic circuits and systems.
See all 207 papers