When Consistency Becomes Bias: Interviewer Effects in Semi-Structured Clinical Interviews

Understanding how psychiatric patients subjectively experienced a clinical conversation is important for feedback and alliance-related process monitoring. While interviewers form post-session judgments about patient experience, these judgments do not always match patients' self-reports. Automatic approaches for predicting perceived interaction quality from conversation have been proposed, but it remains unclear whether such approaches can complement human judgment rather than simply replicate it. To address this gap, we evaluate a clinician-support framework in which post-session interviewer ratings are combined with automatic language-based predictions to estimate patient-reported interaction quality in free clinical interviews. We assess this integration across multiple standard model types, including Ridge, SVR, MLP, GRU, and BiLSTM, all trained on sentence embeddings extracted from dyadic transcripts of 107 free conversations between psychiatric patients and interviewers. Our results show that combining interviewer judgments with model predictions through simple averaging yields the strongest overall performance. The interviewer-only baseline reached a Pearson correlation of 0.365. Among fully automatic models, Ridge achieved the strongest Pearson correlation (r = 0.286), while BiLSTM achieved r = 0.270. The strongest result was obtained by BiLSTM interviewer integration (r = 0.403). Our findings suggest that automatic language analysis and interviewer judgment capture complementary aspects of patient experience and that their combination provides a more accurate approximation of the patient's own report than either source alone.

This paper audits benchmark evaluation in clinical-interview depression detection through four complementary probes across DAIC/E-DAIC, CMDC, ANDROIDS, MODMA, and PDCH. First, we re-evaluate E-DAIC under strict subject-disjoint leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. A lightweight hybrid text-plus-LLM-score model reaches macro-F1 = 0.723 - the highest reported under this protocol, to our knowledge - providing a conservative out-of-fold reference point that does not depend on the privileged official holdout. Second, we test whether the E-DAIC official split supports fine-grained leaderboard rankings by sweeping 96 model configurations across modality bundles, pooling strategies, and learners. Development-side cross-validation and official-test rankings align only moderately: the best cross-validation configuration ranks twentieth on the official test, the official-test winner ranks forty-first by cross-validation, top-3 overlap is zero, and the apparent winner is rank-1 in only 32.3% of subject bootstraps. Third, we externally validate strong public CMDC and ANDROIDS baselines that achieve near-ceiling in-domain performance. Zero-shot transfer to external corpora is substantially weaker. Finally, we stress-test E-DAIC text and audio models using paired symptom-dense versus symptom-light interview slices defined by an SRDS-based annotator. Text scores rise sharply on symptom-dense slices, whereas audio scores remain nearly flat; the text-minus-audio gap is positive across all five seeds.

Automated depression screening from clinical interviews requires attribution of utterances to the clinician or patient. We evaluate two datasets: DAIC-WOZ, where participant-only recordings require re-synthesizing both sides for controlled two-party evaluation, and PDCH-HAMD, comprising voice-converted real Chinese interviews for cross-lingual validation. Cascaded systems combine speaker diarization with role-assignment heuristics, so errors can propagate across stages. We propose an end-to-end model, which we named DiaWhisper, that fine-tunes Whisper-large-v3 with LoRA and an auxiliary frame-level role head for transcription and attribution, together with DiaWhisper-DPO, a failure-mined refinement that uses genuine decoding failures as DPO rejected completions without human preference annotation. On 29 DAIC-WOZ test sessions, DiaWhisper-DPO achieves 0.973 role accuracy and 0.119 DER, 72% below the strongest cascaded baseline, and reduces seed variation from σ = .205 to .002. Retrained on PDCH-HAMD, it achieves 0.757 role accuracy and improves all 78 session-seed pairs.