Dissecting Model Failures in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation through Explainability-Driven Analysis

In CT angiography, the accurate segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is difficult due to large anatomical variability, low-contrast vessel boundaries, and the close proximity of organs whose intensities resemble vascular structures, often leading to false positives. To address these challenges, we propose an anatomy-aware segmentation framework that integrates organ exclusion masks derived from TotalSegmentator into the training process. These masks encode explicit anatomical priors by identifying non-vascular organsand penalizing aneurysm predictions within these regions, thereby guiding the U-Net to focus on the aorta and its pathological dilation while suppressing anatomically implausible predictions. Despite being trained on a relatively small dataset, the anatomy-aware model achieves high accuracy, substantially reduces false positives, and improves boundary consistency compared to a standard U-Net baseline. The results demonstrate that incorporating anatomical knowledge through exclusion masks provides an efficient mechanism to enhance robustness and generalization, enabling reliable AAA segmentation even with limited training data.

Robust segmentation of intraluminal thrombus is critical for risk assessment in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, yet it remains challenging due to heterogeneous thrombus features and low contrast with surrounding non-enhanced tissues. Domain shifts induced by different Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) protocols further inhibit multi-center generalization of deep learning models. To address these challenges, we propose a patient-specific framework that integrates discriminative learning with anatomically informed priors. Our approach introduces two key components: (1) a patient-specific intensity normalization based on a Gaussian Mixture Model of local anatomy, and (2) an Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module that incorporates spatial priors while adaptively modulating their influence according to voxel-wise confidence. This design allows for anatomical guidance in ambiguous regions while suppressing unreliable priors. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on in-distribution test data and substantially outperforms existing alternatives in generalization to external multi-center CTA data, while remaining interpretable through an explicit separation of visual and anatomical evidence.

Medical image segmentation plays a vital role in clinical decision-making, enabling precise localization of lesions and guiding interventions. Despite significant advances in segmentation accuracy, the black-box nature of most deep models has raised growing concerns about their trustworthiness in high-stakes medical scenarios. Current explanation techniques have primarily focused on classification tasks, leaving the segmentation domain relatively underexplored. We introduced an explanation model for segmentation task which employs the causal inference framework and backpropagates the average treatment effect (ATE) into a quantification metric to determine the influence of input regions, as well as network components, on target segmentation areas. Through comparison with recent segmentation explainability techniques on two representative medical imaging datasets, we demonstrated that our approach provides more faithful explanations than existing approaches. Furthermore, we carried out a systematic causal analysis of multiple foundational segmentation models using our method, which reveals significant heterogeneity in perceptual strategies across different models, and even between different inputs for the same model. Suggesting the potential of our method to provide notable insights for optimizing segmentation models. Our code can be found at https://github.com/lcmmai/PdCR.