System-Anchored Knee Estimation for Low-Cost Context Window Selection in PDE Forecasting
Organizations: School of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, China · State Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing & Ocean College, Zhejiang University, China · Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Abstract
Autoregressive neural PDE simulators predict the evolution of physical fields one step at a time from a finite history, but low-cost context-window selection for such simulators remains an unformalized problem. Existing approaches to context-window selection in time-series forecasting include exhaustive validation, direct low-cost search, and system-theoretic memory estimation, but they are either expensive, brittle, or not directly aligned with downstream rollout performance. We formalize explicit context-window selection for fixed-window autoregressive neural PDE simulators as an independent low-cost algorithmic problem, and propose System-Anchored Knee Estimation (SAKE), a two-stage method that first identifies a small structured candidate set from physically interpretable system anchors and then performs knee-aware downstream selection within it. Across all eight PDEBench families evaluated under the shared protocol, SAKE is the strongest overall matched-budget low-cost selector among the evaluated methods, achieving 67.8% Exact, 91.7% Within-1, 6.1% mean regret@knee, and a cost ratio of 0.051 (94.9% normalized search-cost savings).
Figures & tables
| Dataset | System band | Knee-in-band coverage | Covered oracle-knee models | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiffReact | 3 | 6 | [3, 4, 5, 6] | 25.0% | UNet |
| RDB | 2 | 6 | [2, 3, 4, 5, 6] | 75.0% | ConvLSTM, FNO, Transformer |
Appendix figures & tables38 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Component | Setting used in this appendix |
|---|---|
| Candidate grid | , matching the shared main protocol |
| Additional PDEBench families | 1D advection, 1D Burgers, 1D diffusion–sorption, 2D Darcy flow, 2D incompressible Navier–Stokes, 2D compressible Navier–Stokes |
| Backbones / seeds | Same four one-step autoregressive backbones and same three-seed protocol as the main paper |
| Methods | System-core, Direct-4-Shortlist, ASHA, and SAKE under matched downstream budgets |
| Oracle construction | Full sweep over for each dataset–backbone–seed case |
| Reported metrics | Exact, Within-1, mean , , , mean unique evaluations, and cost ratio |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | 12.5% | 40.6% | 28.0% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 50.0% | 84.4% | 9.4% | 7.3 | 0.072 |
| ASHA | 57.3% | 88.0% | 8.0% | 9.6 | 0.092 |
| SAKE | 67.8% | 91.7% | 6.1% | 5.3 | 0.051 |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | 25.0% | 58.3% | 1.25 | 17.6% | 18.1% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 58.3% | 91.7% | 0.50 | 5.8% | 6.4% | 7.1 | 0.070 |
| ASHA | 66.7% | 100.0% | 0.42 | 4.9% | 5.5% | 9.2 | 0.089 |
| SAKE | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.25 | 3.8% | 4.4% | 5.0 | 0.048 |
| Backbone | System-core | D4-Shortlist | ASHA | SAKE | Oracle knee | Oracle best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConvLSTM | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| FNO | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Transformer | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| U-Net | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | 16.7% | 50.0% | 1.58 | 24.5% | 25.1% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 50.0% | 83.3% | 0.67 | 8.9% | 9.6% | 7.2 | 0.071 |
| ASHA | 58.3% | 91.7% | 0.58 | 7.4% | 8.1% | 9.3 | 0.090 |
| SAKE | 66.7% | 91.7% | 0.42 | 5.8% | 6.5% | 5.2 | 0.050 |
| Backbone | System-core | D4-Shortlist | ASHA | SAKE | Oracle knee | Oracle best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConvLSTM | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| FNO | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Transformer | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| U-Net | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | 8.3% | 33.3% | 2.08 | 31.8% | 32.4% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 41.7% | 83.3% | 0.92 | 10.9% | 11.7% | 7.1 | 0.070 |
| ASHA | 50.0% | 83.3% | 0.75 | 8.8% | 9.6% | 9.5 | 0.092 |
| SAKE | 75.0% | 91.7% | 0.42 | 5.6% | 6.3% | 5.1 | 0.049 |
| Backbone | System-core | D4-Shortlist | ASHA | SAKE | Oracle knee | Oracle best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConvLSTM | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| FNO | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Transformer | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| U-Net | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | 16.7% | 41.7% | 1.67 | 23.4% | 24.0% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 50.0% | 83.3% | 0.75 | 9.1% | 9.8% | 7.3 | 0.072 |
| ASHA | 58.3% | 91.7% | 0.58 | 7.8% | 8.5% | 9.4 | 0.091 |
| SAKE | 66.7% | 91.7% | 0.42 | 6.3% | 7.0% | 5.3 | 0.051 |
| Backbone | System-core | D4-Shortlist | ASHA | SAKE | Oracle knee | Oracle best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConvLSTM | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| FNO | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Transformer | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| U-Net | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | 8.3% | 33.3% | 2.17 | 32.7% | 33.4% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 50.0% | 83.3% | 0.83 | 10.8% | 11.5% | 7.4 | 0.073 |
| ASHA | 58.3% | 83.3% | 0.67 | 9.3% | 10.1% | 9.7 | 0.094 |
| SAKE | 66.7% | 91.7% | 0.50 | 7.1% | 7.9% | 5.4 | 0.052 |
| Backbone | System-core | D4-Shortlist | ASHA | SAKE | Oracle knee | Oracle best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConvLSTM | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| FNO | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Transformer | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| U-Net | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | 8.3% | 33.3% | 2.33 | 36.8% | 37.5% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 41.7% | 75.0% | 1.00 | 12.1% | 12.9% | 7.6 | 0.074 |
| ASHA | 50.0% | 75.0% | 0.83 | 10.6% | 11.4% | 9.9 | 0.096 |
| SAKE | 58.3% | 83.3% | 0.67 | 8.4% | 9.2% | 5.6 | 0.054 |
| Backbone | System-core | D4-Shortlist | ASHA | SAKE | Oracle knee | Oracle best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConvLSTM | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| FNO | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Transformer | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| U-Net | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Backbone | Input/context encoding | Core spatiotemporal block | Output head | Key hyperparameters | Trainable parameters (DiffReact / RDB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-Net | causal temporal encoder over the full history | TemporalEncoder 2D U-Net | C-channel next-step field decoder | temporal hidden , temporal layers , kernel , max context ; U-Net base , depth | 1,946,212 / 1,945,826 |
| FNO | causal temporal encoder over the full history | TemporalEncoder 2D FNO | C-channel spectral decoder | temporal hidden , temporal layers , kernel , max context ; width , modes , depth | 4,751,460 / 4,751,298 |
| ConvLSTM | raw frame sequence warm-up over the full history | 1-layer ConvLSTM with hidden-state recurrence | conv to next-step field | hidden channels , layers , kernel | 152,450 / 150,081 |
| Transformer | per-patch causal tokenization of the full history | patchwise Transformer encoder | linear patch reconstruction to field space | patch size , , heads , depth | 939,936 / 927,584 |
| Item | Setting used in the main experiments |
|---|---|
| Datasets | DiffReact, RDB |
| Candidate windows | shared candidate grid for the main-text and appendix evaluations |
| Training seeds | |
| Split | trajectory-level 0.8/0.1/0.1 train/validation/test split |
| Optimizer | Adam |
| Learning rate |
| Stage-1 component | Symbol / object | Role in the method | Setting used in the main experiments |
|---|---|---|---|
| System representation | PCA projector | clean-system state summary | randomized PCA on flattened normalized coarsened fields; samples, variance target, max components |
| Lightweight dynamics model | ridge VAR( ) | low-cost system-risk estimation | one-step linear autoregressive model with ridge fit for each on the shared grid used throughout the paper |
| Long-history reference | tail-risk reference window | under the shared main protocol | |
| Tail tolerance fraction | defines | ||
| Plateau threshold | defines | relative-gain threshold | |
| Uncertainty estimate | bootstrap UCB | confidence control for anchor extraction | bootstrap resamples, confidence level with |
| Stage-2 component | Symbol / object | Role in the method | Setting used in the main experiments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coarse pilot budget | stage-1 pilots | first-pass ranking over | epochs; max train pairs; train trajectories, validation trajectories; rollout horizons (train/val) with max validation rollout trajectories |
| Top-candidate count | top- | number of refined seeds | |
| Neighborhood radius | local grid expansion around promising candidates | hop on the ordered window grid | |
| Refined candidate set | stage-two evaluation set | union of top- neighborhoods, capped at candidates, with smallest and largest anchors retained | |
| Stronger pilot budget | stage-2 pilots | second-pass evaluation budget | epochs; max train pairs; train trajectories, validation trajectories; rollout horizons (train/val) with max validation rollout trajectories |
| Rollout anchors | multi-anchor validation used in stage two | rollout anchors per candidate |
| Method | Initial candidate construction | Uses system anchors? | Downstream budget / final rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| System-core | clean-system estimate only | yes | none / direct return of |
| Direct-3-Shortlist | uniformly spaced 3-point shortlist | no | initial shortlist on the active discrete grid |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | uniformly spaced 4-point shortlist | no | initial shortlist formed from the two internal equally spaced grid quantiles on the active discrete grid |
| SAKE | yes | same pilot family with knee-aware final rule |
| Condition | Anchor-source definition |
|---|---|
| Clean full-state | reference anchor input |
| Gaussian noise | same trajectories with additive mild observation noise |
| Gaussian noise | same trajectories with moderate observation noise |
| Gaussian noise | same trajectories with heavy observation noise |
| Downsample | anchor extraction from half-resolution trajectories |
| Downsample | anchor extraction from quarter-resolution trajectories |
| Anchor condition | Mean | Mean | Knee-in-band | Knee in | Knee in | Mean active-set size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean full-state | 0.00 | 0.00 | 50.0% | 25.0% | 95.8% | 4.0 |
| Gaussian noise | 0.04 | 0.13 | 50.0% | 25.0% | 95.8% | 4.1 |
| Gaussian noise | 0.08 | 0.50 | 45.8% | 25.0% | 91.7% | 4.3 |
| Gaussian noise | 0.46 | 1.58 | 37.5% | 20.8% | 79.2% | 4.7 |
| Downsample | 0.13 | 0.38 | 47.9% | 25.0% | 95.8% | 4.1 |
| Downsample | 0.38 | 1.50 | 41.7% | 20.8% | 83.3% | 4.6 |
| Anchor condition | Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean full-state | System-core | 0.0% | 37.5% | 1.88 | 49.7% | 0.000 |
| Clean full-state | SAKE | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.25 | 6.7% | 0.043 |
| Gaussian noise | System-core | 0.0% | 29.2% | 1.96 | 53.8% | 0.000 |
| Gaussian noise | SAKE | 70.8% | 95.8% | 0.29 | 7.5% | 0.043 |
| Gaussian noise | System-core | 0.0% | 25.0% | 2.04 | 58.6% | 0.000 |
| Gaussian noise | SAKE | 66.7% | 95.8% | 0.38 | 8.9% | 0.044 |
| Dataset | Backbone | Clean | Noise 0.05 | Downsample x4 | Mask 25% | Same-data noisy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| DiffReact | FNO | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| DiffReact | Transformer | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| DiffReact | U-Net | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| RDB | ConvLSTM | 2 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| Dataset | Backbone | Clean | Noise 0.05 | Downsample x4 | Mask 25% | Same-data noisy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| DiffReact | FNO | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| DiffReact | Transformer | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| DiffReact | U-Net | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| RDB | ConvLSTM | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| RDB | FNO | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Component | Setting used in this appendix |
|---|---|
| Anchor-source conditions | same-data full-state, same-data noisy, spatial downsampled observations, sparse probe observations, masked observations, and learned-latent summaries |
| Representation families | randomized PCA, randomized SVD, random Gaussian projection, and convolutional autoencoder latent summaries |
| Primary selector comparison | System-core and SAKE under the same matched downstream budgets as the main paper |
| Reference direct baselines | Direct-4-Shortlist and ASHA, reported once as clean-independent search references |
| Reported anchor metrics | mean , mean , knee-in-band coverage, knee-in-shortlist coverage, and final active-set coverage |
| Reported selection metrics | Exact, Within-1, mean , , mean unique evaluations, and cost ratio |
| Anchor source | Mean | Mean | Knee-in-band coverage | Knee-in-shortlist coverage | Final active-set coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same-data full-state | 0.00 | 0.13 | 50.0% | 25.0% | 95.8% |
| Same-data noisy | 0.08 | 0.75 | 41.7% | 20.8% | 83.3% |
| Downsample | 0.13 | 0.38 | 47.9% | 25.0% | 95.8% |
| Sparse probes ( ) | 0.42 | 1.04 | 41.7% | 20.8% | 87.5% |
| Random mask 25% | 0.04 | 1.50 | 37.5% | 20.8% | 79.2% |
| Learned latent summary | 0.17 | 0.54 | 45.8% | 25.0% | 91.7% |
| Anchor source | Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Same-data full-state | System-core | 0.0% | 37.5% | 1.88 | 50.8% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Same-data full-state | SAKE | 70.8% | 95.8% | 0.29 | 7.1% | 4.0 | 0.043 |
| Same-data noisy | System-core | 0.0% | 20.8% | 2.17 | 63.1% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Same-data noisy | SAKE | 62.5% | 87.5% | 0.50 | 11.9% | 4.5 | 0.045 |
| Downsample | System-core | 0.0% | 33.3% | 1.92 | 52.2% | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Downsample | SAKE | 70.8% | 95.8% | 0.33 | 7.9% | 4.1 | 0.043 |
| Representation | Mean | Mean | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized PCA | 0.00 | 0.13 | 70.8% | 95.8% | 7.1% | 0.043 |
| Randomized SVD | 0.04 | 0.17 | 70.8% | 95.8% | 7.3% | 0.043 |
| Random projection | 0.33 | 0.83 | 54.2% | 83.3% | 13.9% | 0.045 |
| Autoencoder latent | 0.13 | 0.29 | 66.7% | 91.7% | 8.0% | 0.044 |
| Representation | Mean | Mean | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized PCA | 0.08 | 0.75 | 62.5% | 87.5% | 11.9% | 0.045 |
| Randomized SVD | 0.13 | 0.79 | 62.5% | 87.5% | 12.1% | 0.045 |
| Random projection | 0.46 | 1.25 | 45.8% | 75.0% | 17.2% | 0.046 |
| Autoencoder latent | 0.17 | 0.67 | 58.3% | 87.5% | 12.0% | 0.045 |
| Dataset | Backbone | Same-data full-state | Same-data noisy | Sparse probes | Learned latent | Oracle knee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| DiffReact | FNO | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| DiffReact | Transformer | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| DiffReact | U-Net | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| RDB | ConvLSTM | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| RDB | FNO | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Quantity | Symbol | Values | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tail tolerance fraction | {0.02, 0.05, 0.10} | controls how early the long-history tail is treated as effectively closed | |
| Plateau threshold | {0.02, 0.05, 0.10} | controls how early diminishing returns are declared | |
| One-standard-error multiplier | {1.0, 1.5, 2.0} | controls the smallest-reliable-window rule in stage two | |
| Bootstrap resamples | {100, 300, 500} | controls the stability of the UCB estimates used by stage one | |
| Knee tolerance | {2%, 5%, 10%, 15%} | changes the oracle target itself rather than only the selector rule |
| Quantity | Value | Mean | Mean | Knee-in-band | Mean unique eval. | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.02 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 58.3% | 4.8 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.25 | 6.5% | 0.046 | |
| 0.05 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 50.0% | 4.4 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.25 | 6.7% | 0.043 | |
| 0.10 | 2.1 | 5.8 | 41.7% | 4.0 | 70.8% | 95.8% | 0.33 | 7.4% | 0.039 | |
| 0.02 | 2.5 | 6.4 | 54.2% | 4.9 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.25 | 6.4% | 0.047 | |
| 0.05 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 50.0% | 4.4 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.25 | 6.7% | 0.043 | |
| 0.10 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 41.7% | 4.0 | 70.8% | 95.8% | 0.33 | 7.6% | 0.039 |
| Dataset | Backbone | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| DiffReact | FNO | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| DiffReact | Transformer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DiffReact | U-Net | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| RDB | ConvLSTM | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| RDB | FNO | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Method | Exact | Within-1 | Mean | Mean | Mean | Cost ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | System-core | 0.0% | 29.2% | 2.04 | 58.2% | 58.6% | 0.000 |
| 2% | Direct-4-Shortlist | 50.0% | 79.2% | 0.71 | 13.4% | 13.9% | 0.058 |
| 2% | SAKE | 62.5% | 91.7% | 0.42 | 8.6% | 9.1% | 0.043 |
| 5% | System-core | 0.0% | 37.5% | 1.88 | 49.7% | 49.9% | 0.000 |
| 5% | Direct-4-Shortlist | 62.5% | 87.5% | 0.50 | 10.5% | 10.8% | 0.058 |
| 5% | SAKE | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.25 | 6.7% | 7.0% | 0.043 |
| Quantity | Definition in this appendix |
|---|---|
| Selector wall-clock | End-to-end elapsed time for one selector run, including all pilot training and validation passes |
| Selector GPU-hours | Sum over all GPUs used by a selector run, measured over the same pilot and validation work |
| Full-sweep wall-clock ratio | Selector wall-clock divided by the elapsed time of the corresponding exhaustive sweep |
| Queueing / scheduling | Excluded; all measurements assume dedicated local execution on the shared A100 server |
| Method | Mean selector wall-clock (h) | Mean selector GPU-hours | Full-sweep wall-clock ratio | Mean unique eval. | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct-3-Shortlist | 1.04 | 4.16 | 0.069 | 5.8 | 0.057 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 1.08 | 4.31 | 0.071 | 5.9 | 0.058 |
| ASHA | 1.23 | 4.94 | 0.081 | 6.0 | 0.065 |
| BO-MF | 1.28 | 5.12 | 0.084 | 6.0 | 0.068 |
| BOHB-style | 1.25 | 5.00 | 0.082 | 6.0 | 0.067 |
| SAKE | 0.86 | 3.43 | 0.057 | 4.4 | 0.043 |
| Dataset | Backbone | Method | Wall-clock (h) | GPU-hours | Cost ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | Direct-4-Shortlist | 0.62 | 2.48 | 0.054 |
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | ASHA | 0.70 | 2.78 | 0.061 |
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | BO-MF | 0.72 | 2.90 | 0.064 |
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | BOHB-style | 0.70 | 2.82 | 0.063 |
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | SAKE | 0.52 | 2.07 | 0.041 |
| DiffReact | ConvLSTM | Full sweep | 9.40 | 37.60 | 1.000 |
| Method | Stage-1 wall-clock | Stage-2 wall-clock | Validation overhead | Total wall-clock | Total GPU-hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct-3-Shortlist | 0.10 | 0.79 | 0.15 | 1.04 | 4.16 |
| Direct-4-Shortlist | 0.12 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 1.08 | 4.31 |
| ASHA | 0.18 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 1.23 | 4.94 |
| BO-MF | 0.21 | 0.91 | 0.16 | 1.28 | 5.12 |
| BOHB-style | 0.20 | 0.88 | 0.17 | 1.25 | 5.00 |
| SAKE | 0.16 | 0.54 | 0.16 | 0.86 | 3.43 |
Neural PDE Solvers
Neural PDE solvers use trainable models to approximate solutions or solution operators for partial differential equations, often with physical constraints.
See all 269 papers