Current audio pre-training seeks to learn unified representations for broad audio understanding tasks, but it remains fragmented and is fundamentally bottlenecked by its reliance on weak, noisy, and scale-limited labels. Drawing lessons from vision's foundational pre-training blueprint, we argue that the audio field must first establish its own large-scale, strong supervision framework. We introduce a new data-centric pipeline that leverages a high-fidelity captioner to create SOTA-quality captions and the first Unified Tag System (UTS) that bridges speech, music, and environmental sounds. We then conduct a systematic comparative study of different pre-training objectives on these strong source data. Our experiments suggest that data quality and coverage are the primary drivers of performance, while the choice of objective dictates downstream task specialization.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: An overview of our method. (a) Audio Tagging Pipeline: we generate tags by processing raw audio through Qwen3-Omni-Captioner [ 87 ] and an LLM Parser [ 90 ] . (b) Pre-Training Pipeline: the audio encoder is then pre-trained using these tags with two supervision objectives: a discriminative multi-tag classification (MTC) Objective (using a linear classifier) and a generative parellel decoding (PAR) Objective (using a text decoder with a bidirectional mask).
Figure 2: Analysis of our tag system. (a) Word cloud of the most frequent tags in our parsed tags, illustrating its diverse vocabulary. (b) t-SNE comparison of our UTS-1.5k (blue) and AudioSet (red), demonstrating our system’s superior semantic coverage and density. (c) The characteristic long-tail tag frequency distribution of all parsed tags.
Dataset
Audio Coverage
Tag Size
Data Size
AudioSet [ 29 ]
General events (incl. speech, music)
527
∼ 2M
FSD-50k [ 27 ]
General sound events
200
∼ 50k
VggSound [ 9 ]
General sound events
309
∼ 200k
CREMA-D [ 8 ]
Speech
6
∼ 7k
MagnaTagATune [ 82 ]
Music
50
∼ 24k
Ours
Unified (Speech, Music, Env. Sounds)
800/1k/1.5k/2k/3k
∼ 400k
Table 1: Comparison of existing audio tagging datasets.
Methods
Label
Linear Probing
Audio-language Alignment
Captioning
Retrieval
FSD-50k
VggSound
AS-Strong
VoxCeleb2
CREMA-D
MTAT
NSynth
AC
PSC
MC
AC
PSC
MC
SSL Models
BEATs [ 12 ]
-
0.565 †
-
0.034 †
-
-
0.400 †
75.90 †
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wav2vec 2.0 [ 3 ]
-
0.342 †
-
-
51.60
56.10
0.317 †
40.20 †
-
-
-
-
-
-
MERT [ 51 ]
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.402 †
72.60 †
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table 2: Main results on linear probing (with mean-pooling) and audio-language alignment. The linear probing tasks span general audio (FSD-50k [ 27 ] , VggSound [ 9 ] , AudioSet-Strong [ 37 ] ), speech (VoxCeleb2 [ 15 ] , CREMA-D [ 8 ] ), and music (MagnaTagATune [ 82 ] , NSynth [ 25 ] ). See Supplementary Material Sec. 8 for full details of evaluation datasets and metrics. For audio-language alignment, AC, PSC, and MC refer to the AudioCaps [ 44 ] , ParaSpeechCaps [ 21 ] , and MusicCaps [ 1 ] , respectively. We bold the best score among our proposed models. Baseline scores that are underlined are surpassed by their corresponding “Ours” counterpart. † denotes scores quoted from prior work with a consistent evaluation setup.
Methods
Open-formed QA
Sound
Speech (emotion/gender/age)
Music
Baselines
MTC (AudioSet)
7.01
47.16/ 25.90 / 47.27 / 45.06 / 37.24
5.61
Contrastive-scratch [ 78 ]
5.69
29.61 /48.79/ 55.25 /84.85/86.59
5.99
Captioning-scratch [ 78 ]
6.25
22.93 /37.40/70.20/78.93/40.14
5.73
Our Tag-Oriented Pre-Trained Models
Table 3: Open-formed Question Answering (QA) Results on the AIR-Bench [ 91 ] . The Sound and Music columns report 10-point scores from open-ended questions, evaluated by GPT-4o [ 62 ] . The five scores in the Speech column correspond to the classification accuracy on the Emotion-MELD, Emotion-IEMOCAP, Gender-MELD, Gender-common, and Age tasks, respectively.
Table 5: Overview of the public datasets constituting CaptionStew. The table summarizes their scale, domain coverage, audio sources, and diverse captioning pipelines (from human annotation to LLM generation).
Figure 8
Evaluation Dataset
Task
#samples
#class
train
eval
Metrics
FSD-50k
Multi-label audio event classification
37,168 / 10,231
200
✓
✓
mAP
VggSound
Single-label audio event classification
183,730 / 15,446
309
✓
✓
accuracy
VoxCeleb2
Speaker identification
1,092,009 / 36,693
5,994
✓
✓
accuracy
CREMA-D
Speech emotion recognition
6,030 / 706
6
✓
✓
accuracy
MagnaTagATune
Music tagging
19,425 / 4,856
50
✓
✓
mAP
NSynth
Musical instrument classification
289,205 / 4,096
11
✓
✓
accuracy
Table 6: Overview of the evaluation datasets used for assessing audio representation quality. † Evaluated by GPT-4o following the AIR-Bench protocol. ‡ Synthesized from publicly available speech datasets [ 2 , 7 , 8 , 54 , 63 ] using fixed question templates.
Methods
Label
Linear Probing
Audio-language Alignment
Captioning
Retrieval
FSD-50k
VggSound
AS-Strong
VoxCeleb2
CREMA-D
MTAT
NSynth
AC
PSC
MC
AC
PSC
MC
SSL Models
BEATs [ 12 ]
-
0.565 †
-
0.034 †
-
-
0.400 †
75.90 †
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wav2vec 2.0 [ 3 ]
-
0.342 †
-
-
51.60
56.10
0.317 †
40.20 †
-
-
-
-
-
-
MERT [ 51 ]
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.402 †
72.60 †
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table 7: Complete results on linear probing (with mean-pooling) and audio-language alignment. The linear probing tasks span general audio (FSD-50k [ 27 ] , VggSound [ 9 ] , AudioSet-Strong [ 37 ] ), speech (VoxCeleb2 [ 15 ] , CREMA-D [ 8 ] ), and music (MagnaTagATune [ 82 ] , NSynth [ 25 ] ). For audio-language alignment, AC, PSC, and MC refer to the AudioCaps [ 44 ] , ParaSpeechCaps [ 21 ] , and MusicCaps [ 1 ] , respectively. We bold the best score in our tag-oriented models and audio-language models respectively. Baseline scores that are underlined are surpassed by their corresponding “Ours” counterpart. † denotes scores quoted from prior work with a consistent evaluation setup.
Methods
Linear Probing
Open-formed QA
FSD-50k
VggSound
VoxCeleb2
CREMA-D
MTAT
NSynth
Sound
Speech (emotion/gender/age)
Music
Baselines
MTC (AudioSet)
0.656
56.23
58.76
72.52
0.405
74.80
7.01
47.16/ 25.90 / 47.27 / 45.06 / 37.24
5.61
Contrastive-scratch [ 78 ]
0.534
46.79
70.18
69.97
0.385
70.19
5.69
29.61 /48.79/ 55.25 /84.85/86.59
5.99
Captioning-scratch [ 78 ]
0.483
43.43
44.51
66.29
0.382
68.31
6.25
22.93 /37.40/70.20/78.93/40.14
5.73
Our Tag-Oriented Pre-Trained Models
Table 8: Complete results on linear probing (with multi-head attention pooling) and open-formed QA. The Sound and Music columns report 10-point scores on open-ended questions from AIR-Bench, evaluated by GPT-4o [ 62 ] . The five scores in the Speech column correspond to the classification accuracy on the Emotion-MELD, Emotion-IEMOCAP, Gender-MELD, Gender-common, and Age tasks, respectively.
Audio-language pretraining (ALP) holds promise for learning general-purpose audio representation, yet remains underexplored. Crucially, there is no consensus on whether audio-language models can build effective general-purpose audio encoders, nor a systematic understanding of how pretraining objectives behave across diverse tasks and scales. We identify three key barriers: limited scale of audio-text corpora, limited coverage of audio attributes in existing caption corpora, and lack of systematic exploration and evaluation. To fill this gap, we present the first principled empirical study of ALP. We first introduce CaptionStew, a 10.7M caption dataset aggregating open-source audio-text corpora across multiple domains and captioning focuses. We then conduct the first comprehensive evaluation comparing contrastive and captioning objectives for learning audio representation across speech, music, and environmental sound tasks. Our results not only demonstrate that ALP yields competitive, transferable representations, but reveal critical trade-offs: contrastive learning offers superior data efficiency, while captioning exhibits better scalability. Furthermore, we find that the benefits of supervised initialization often diminish at larger scales, challenging common practices. By grounding these claims in empirical evidence, we establish a viable pathway toward general-purpose audio representation learning, guiding future research.
Wei-Cheng Tseng, Xuanru Zhou, Mingyue Huo +3
University of Texas at Austin · Tencent AI Lab Seattle · Zhejiang University +1
Weakly labeled datasets such as AudioSet have driven recent progress in audio tagging. However, annotation quality varies across sound classes. Labels may be incomplete, ambiguous, or unreliable, which introduces class-dependent supervision bias during optimisation. The issue becomes harder as real and generated audio are increasingly mixed in training, and generated samples do not always match their intended semantic labels. Prior work mainly addressed unreliable supervision from missing-positive labels, while this paper targets three other sources of unreliable supervision: spurious additions, misassignments between similar classes, and weakened label evidence. These effects introduce class-dependent optimisation bias that is not explicitly modeled by most existing methods. To bridge this gap, the paper proposes a Class-wise Supervision Unreliability (CSU) framework that controls supervision strength at the class level during training. CSU learns a separate unreliability parameter for each class and down-weights less reliable supervision without changing the model architecture or inference process. To support evaluations, this paper also introduces ESC-FreeGen50, a manually verified benchmark of 50 sound classes that combines real and generated audio. Experiments on controlled benchmarks and AudioSet show that CSU improves robustness across different architectures and different sources of supervision unreliability. The results indicate that explicit class-wise modeling of supervision unreliability is an effective and practical strategy for robust audio tagging under large-scale weakly labeled training. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/Yuanbo2020/CSU
Yuanbo Hou, Zhaoyi Liu, Tong Ye +4
Machine Learning Research Group, Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK · KU Leuven, Belgium · GISP, Harbin Engineering University, China +2
General audio understanding is a fundamental goal for large audio-language models, with audio captioning serving as a cornerstone task for their development. However, progress in this domain is hindered by existing datasets, which lack the scale and descriptive granularity required to train truly versatile models. To address this gap, we introduce ACAVCaps, a new large-scale, fine-grained, and multi-faceted audio captioning dataset. Derived from the ACAV100M collection, ACAVCaps is constructed using a multi-expert pipeline that analyzes audio from diverse perspectives-including speech, music, and acoustic properties-which are then synthesized into rich, detailed descriptions by a large language model. Experimental results demonstrate that models pre-trained on ACAVCaps exhibit substantially stronger generalization capabilities on various downstream tasks compared to those trained on other leading captioning datasets. The dataset is available at https://github.com/xiaomi-research/acavcaps.
Yadong Niu, Tianzi Wang, Heinrich Dinkel +6
MiLM Plus, Xiaomi Inc, Beijing, China · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China