Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have mainly focused on improving final answer correctness and strengthening visual grounding. However, a critical bottleneck remains: although models can attend to relevant visual regions, they often fail to effectively incorporate visual evidence into subsequent reasoning, leading to reasoning chains that are weakly grounded in visual facts. To address this issue, we propose Trajectory-Guided Reinforcement Learning (TGRL), which guides the policy model to integrate visual evidence into fine-grained reasoning processes using expert reasoning trajectories from stronger models. We further introduce token-level reweighting and trajectory filtering to ensure stable and effective policy optimization. Extensive experiments on multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that TGRL consistently improves reasoning performance and effectively bridges the gap between visual perception and logical reasoning.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison of different supervision strategies in multimodal RLVR. (A) Outcome-only supervision may lead to perception failures, where incorrect visual evidence is used for reasoning. (B) Adding perception supervision improves visual grounding but does not guarantee correct reasoning transitions. (C) Our trajectory supervision aligns the perception–reasoning process, enabling reasoning grounded in correct visual evidence and leading to correct answers.
Figure 2: Overview of T rajectory G uided R einforcement L earning (TGRL). Given an image-question pair, we construct a rollout group by integrating on-policy and expert trajectories. Expert trajectories are then reweighted at the token level and filtered by correctness, enabling trajectory-level alignment within RLVR framework.
Method
WeMath
MathVista
MathVerse
MathVision
HalluBench
Avg.
TGRL-GRPO
70.29
71.50
51.08
27.41
72.02
58.46
w/o Filter
68.74
70.80
50.65
26.68
71.04
57.50
w/o Reweight
67.58
70.40
50.14
27.11
69.90
57.03
w/o Expert (GRPO)
67.40
70.50
50.80
27.30
69.80
57.16
TGRL-DAPO
71.05
71.40
55.21
28.61
71.29
59.51
w/o Filter
69.80
70.20
51.74
27.57
70.35
57.93
Table 1: Component ablation of TGRL on Qwen2.5-VL-7B under GRPO and DAPO. Removing trajectory reweighting or filtering consistently degrades performance, demonstrating the importance of properly utilizing expert trajectories. We set β=5 for GRPO and β=14 for DAPO.
Method
WeMath
MathVista
MathVerse
MathVision
HalluBench
Avg.
GRPO
67.40
70.50
50.80
27.30
69.80
57.16
β=1
68.70
70.60
51.03
27.68
71.40
57.88
β=4
69.37
70.80
51.14
27.60
71.71
58.12
β=5
70.29
71.50
51.08
27.41
72.02
58.46
β=7
68.10
70.54
50.53
27.50
70.14
57.36
β=10
68.36
70.24
50.81
27.83
69.62
57.37
Table 2: Sensitivity analysis of the token reweighting coefficient β on the Qwen2.5-VL-7B under GRPO and DAPO. Baseline denotes vanilla GRPO/DAPO training without trajectories. Best results within each block are highlighted in bold .
Method
Data
WeMath
MathVista
MathVerse
MathVision
HalluBench
Avg.
VLAA-Thinker [ 1 ]
25K
67.90
68.80
49.90
26.90
68.60
56.42
Perception-R1 [ 33 ]
1.4K
72.00
74.20
54.30
28.60
-
-
ThinkLite [ 29 ]
11K
69.20
72.70
50.20
27.60
71.00
58.14
NoisyRollout [ 12 ]
6.4K
70.30
74.50
53.0
30.60
72.20
60.12
R1-Onevision [ 36 ]
165K
62.10
63.90
46.10
22.50
65.60
52.04
OpenVLThinker [ 3 ]
50K
67.80
71.50
48.00
25.00
70.80
56.62
Table 3: Comparison with state-of-the-art multimodal reasoning methods on five benchmarks using Qwen-2.5-VL-7B as base model. TGRL consistently improves both GRPO and DAPO across various training scales and achieves the best performance.
Extending Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to multimodal large language models (MLLMs) faces a fundamental challenge: their responses inherently interleave perception-related tokens, which ground visual content, with reasoning-related tokens, which construct reasoning chains. These token types instantiate distinct yet interdependent capacities -- visual grounding and symbolic reasoning -- making isolated optimization insufficient. Through token-level empirical analysis, we demonstrate that optimizing either perception- or reasoning-only tokens consistently underperforms full optimization, underscoring their inherent coupling. To address this, we propose a plug-and-play Token-Reweighting (ToR) strategy that explicitly models this interdependence by identifying critical tokens of both types and dynamically reweighting them during RLVR training. Applied on top of existing methods (e.g., GRPO and DAPO), ToR delivers consistent performance gains across multiple multi-modal reasoning benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art performance with both accurate visual grounding and coherent reasoning.
Jinda Lu, Junkang Wu, Jinghan Li +6
University of Science and Technology of China · Peking University · Independent Researcher
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, existing RLVR methods primarily rely on trajectory-level outcome rewards, which assign identical learning signals across all generated tokens. This coarse-grained credit assignment is fundamentally mismatched to multimodal reasoning, where only a sparse subset of tokens is causally grounded in visual evidence. Consequently, these pivotal perceptual tokens receive weak supervision and are often overwhelmed by language priors or reasoning-template tokens. To address this limitation, we propose Perception-Reinforced Policy Optimization (PRPO), a token-level reinforcement learning framework that explicitly identifies and reinforces pivotal perceptual tokens within long-horizon multimodal reasoning trajectories. PRPO introduces Robust Visual Dependency (RVD), a principled metric that identifies tokens whose predictions are both visually grounded and perturbation-stable, filtering out brittle or noisy visual tokens. Based on RVD, we further propose Perceptual Advantage Reshaping (PAR), a token-level credit assignment technique that amplifies perceptually informative tokens while preserving stable gradients for non-perceptual tokens. Extensive experiments on seven multimodal reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PRPO consistently outperforms strong LVLM baselines across both 3B and 7B model scales, achieving average gains of 23.3% and 21.1%, respectively. PRPO achieves state-of-the-art performance with improved training efficiency and stronger cross-task generalization. Our findings highlight the importance of fine-grained credit assignment for scalable multimodal reinforcement learning.
Multimodal large language models via reinforcement learning (RL) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex visual reasoning tasks, yet they remain limited in long-horizon multimodal scenarios, often suffering from visual hallucination and logical error. Current methods typically pre-encode high-dimensional visual scenes into discrete textual proxies to facilitate downstream reasoning. As the reasoning chain unfolds, however, the inherent information asymmetry between text and visual scenes tends to erode visual grounding, resulting in misguided reasoning and erroneous outputs. To address this issue, we introduce IVR-R1 (Iterative Visual-grounded Reasoning), a novel RL training framework that facilitates dynamic visual re-alignment that actively rectifies reasoning trajectories to guide policy optimization. Specifically, by leveraging a reward-driven screening mechanism to identify flawed rollouts, IVR-R1 executes a fine-grained, step-level error attribution within the multimodal context. By iteratively cross-referencing intermediate reasoning states against pristine visual priors, a Re-Reasoning Loop enables automated trajectory rectification, effectively synthesizing expert-level demonstrations that serve as high-fidelity reasoning templates for the policy model. Our experiments across diverse multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that IVR-R1 consistently outperforms existing reinforcement learning methods, establishing a superior paradigm for maintaining logical and visual consistency in complex multimodal reasoning.
Chenghao Li, Fusheng Hao, Xikai Zhang +5
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University · Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Integration Technology, Shenzhen · Kuaishou Technology +1