cs.LGMar 31, 2026

Target-Aligned Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Leonard S. Pleiss, James Harrison, Maximilian Schiffer

Organizations: Google DeepMind

Abstract

Many value-based deep reinforcement learning algorithms rely on target networks - lagged copies of the online network - to stabilize training. While effective, this mechanism introduces a fundamental stability-recency tradeoff: slower target updates improve stability but reduce the recency of learning signals, hindering convergence speed. We propose Target-Aligned Reinforcement Learning (TARL), a simple drop-in refinement for existing algorithms that emphasizes transitions for which the target and online network estimates are highly aligned. By focusing updates on well-aligned targets, TARL mitigates the adverse effects of stale target estimates while retaining the stabilizing benefits of target networks. We empirically demonstrate consistent improvements within discrete and continuous control algorithms across various benchmark environments without any hyperparameter tuning, including a 38.18% peak score gain on Atari-10, while incurring less than a 4% increase in wall-clock time.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables11 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Oct 18, 2024

Streaming Deep Reinforcement Learning Finally Works

Learning from a stream of experience as it arrives, also known as streaming learning, is a core part of natural learning. However, reliable streaming learning has remained a persistent challenge in modern deep reinforcement learning (RL). Instead, most deep RL algorithms learn from old experience by storing past interactions in a buffer. We show that both classical streaming RL, such as Q-learning and actor-critic, when used with deep neural networks, and batch deep RL, such as PPO, SAC, and DQN, when adapted to the streaming setting, often fail to learn. Across 58 Atari games and 50 continuous-control tasks, we find that these methods, in aggregate, perform close to random policies despite extensive task-specific hyperparameter searches. We call this pattern stream barrier. Here, we introduce Stream-X, a shared recipe for streaming deep RL algorithms that combines signal normalization, representation stabilization, and controlled parameter updates. By applying Stream-X to several base streaming RL algorithms, we provide the first family of deep RL algorithms to overcome the stream barrier. Using one prescribed hyperparameter configuration per algorithm across tasks, Stream-X substantially improves aggregate performance, often on par with batch RL algorithms. Beyond these benchmarks, we demonstrate learning with Stream-X algorithms under nonstationarity and resource constraints. Stream-AC, one of the Stream-X algorithms, repeatedly recovers performance across alternating floor-friction regimes in simulation, outperforming the evaluated PPO and SAC baselines. It also learns a heading tracking task on a robot using proprioceptive and visual features from the on-board camera in a naturally changing laboratory environment. Stream-Q learns a Pong game from pixels directly on an ESP32-S3 microcontroller, a device with limited compute and memory.
Sep 17, 2026

Score Centering Stabilizes Off-policy Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning (RL) of large language models is notoriously sensitive to small differences between training and inference engines, often referred to as the training-inference mismatch (TIM). However, completely eliminating TIM is impractical, as it would come at a major cost to rollout efficiency. In this paper, we show that the instability of RL under TIM is primarily caused by drift: a persistent bias between training and inference engines that accumulates with every training step. We derive an additive "score centering" correction term that stabilizes RL under TIM by canceling drift. When training models from 0.6B to 30B parameters, score centering alone matches or outperforms methods based on importance sampling under quantization, with the gap growing as the mismatch becomes more severe. Because the correction is additive, score centering also composes with importance sampling -- their composition outperforms pure importance-sampling baselines in our staleness experiments.
Sep 23, 2026

Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learning with Risk Sensitivity and Critic Consistency Regularization

Reinforcement learning (RL) achieves strong performance in sequential decision-making but remains brittle under dynamic uncertainty and distributional shifts. Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learning (RARL) improves robustness via worst-case perturbations, but existing approaches frequently suffer from unstable optimization and degraded value estimation. In particular, overly aggressive adversaries can drive the agent toward uninformative failure states, while adversarial perturbations amplify disagreement between double critics and introduce biased value targets. We propose a unified framework, RACER (Risk-sensitive robust Adversarial critic ConsistEncy-regularized Reinforcement learning), that revisits adversarial RL from a risk-sensitive perspective. First, we introduce a state-dependent adversarial objective that adaptively regulates perturbation strength, suppressing harmful disturbances while preserving informative exploration. Second, we propose critic consistency regularization to reduce disagreement between Q-value estimators and stabilize learning. Comprehensive experiments on challenging continuous control benchmarks demonstrate that RACER consistently improves performance, robustness, and training stability over strong robust RL baselines.