Multimodal Analysis of State-Funded News Coverage of the Israel-Hamas War on YouTube Shorts

The recent escalation of the Iran Israel USA conflict in 2026 has triggered widespread global discussions across social media platforms. As people increasingly use these platforms for expressing opinions, analyzing public sentiment from these discussions can provide valuable insights into global public perception. This study aims to analyze global public sentiment regarding the Iran Israel USA conflict by mining user-generated comments from YouTube news channels. The work contributes to public opinion analysis by introducing a privacy preserving framework that combines topic wise sentiment analysis with modern deep learning techniques and Federated Learning. To achieve this, approximately 19,000 YouTube comments were collected from major international news channels and preprocessed to remove noise and normalize text. Sentiment labels were initially generated using the VADER sentiment analyzer and later validated through manual inspection to improve reliability. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was applied to identify key discussion topics related to the conflict. Several transformer-based models, including BERT, RoBERTa, XLNet, DistilBERT, ModernBERT, and ELECTRA, were fine tuned for sentiment classification. The best-performing model was further integrated into a federated learning environment to enable distributed training by preserving user data privacy. Additionally, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques using SHAP were applied to interpret model predictions and identify influential words affecting sentiment classification. Experimental results demonstrate that transformer models perform effectively, and among them, ELECTRA achieved the best performance with 91.32% accuracy. The federated learning also maintained strong performance while preserving privacy, achieving 89.59% accuracy in a two client configuration.

This study examines how different artificial intelligence architectures interpret sentiment in conflict-related media discourse, using the 2023 Gaza War as a case study. Drawing on a corpus of 10,990 Arabic news headlines (Eleraqi 2026), the research conducts a comparative analysis between three large language models and six fine-tuned Arabic BERT models. Rather than evaluating accuracy against a single human-annotated gold standard, the study adopts an epistemological approach that treats sentiment classification as an interpretive act produced by model architectures. To quantify systematic differences across models, the analysis employs information-theoretic and distributional metrics, including Shannon Entropy, Jensen-Shannon Distance, and a Variance Score measuring deviation from aggregate model behavior. The results reveal pronounced and non-random divergence in sentiment distributions. Fine-tuned BERT models, particularly MARBERT, exhibit a strong bias toward neutral classifications, while LLMs consistently amplify negative sentiment, with LLaMA-3.1-8B showing near-total collapse into negativity. Frame-conditioned analysis further demonstrates that GPT-4.1 adjusts sentiment judgments in line with narrative frames (e.g., humanitarian, legal, security), whereas other LLMs display limited contextual modulation. These findings suggest that the choice of model constitutes a choice of interpretive lens, shaping how conflict narratives are algorithmically framed and emotionally evaluated. The study contributes to media studies and computational social science by foregrounding algorithmic discrepancy as an object of analysis and by highlighting the risks of treating automated sentiment outputs as neutral or interchangeable measures of media tone in contexts of war and crisis.

Automated semantic annotation of broadcast television content presents distinctive challenges, combining structured audiovisual composition, domain-specific editorial patterns, and strict operational constraints. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong general-purpose video understanding capabilities, their comparative effectiveness across pipeline architectures and input configurations in broadcast-specific settings remains empirically undercharacterized. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of multimodal annotation pipelines applied to broadcast television news in the Italian setting. We construct a domain-specific benchmark of clips labeled across four semantic dimensions: visual environment classification, topic classification, sensitive content detection, and named entity recognition. Two different pipeline architectures are evaluated across nine frontier models, including Gemini 3.0 Pro, LLaMA 4 Maverick, Qwen-VL variants, and Gemma 3, under progressively enriched input strategies combining visual signals, automatic speech recognition, speaker diarization, and metadata. Experimental results demonstrate that gains from video input are strongly model-dependent: larger models effectively leverage temporal continuity, while smaller models show performance degradation under extended multimodal context, likely due to token overload. Beyond benchmarking, the selected pipeline is deployed on 14 full broadcast episodes, with minute-level annotations integrated with normalized audience measurement data provided by an Italian media company. This integration enables correlational analysis of topic-level audience sensitivity and generational engagement divergence, demonstrating the operational viability of the proposed framework for content-based audience analytics.