cs.LGApr 1, 2026

Property-Level Flood Risk Assessment Using AI-Enabled Street-View Lowest Floor Elevation Extraction and ML Imputation Across Texas

Authors: Xiangpeng Li, Yu-Hsuan Ho, Sam D Brody, Ali Mostafavi

Organizations: Ph.D. student. Urban Resilience.AI Lab, Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States. · Director, Institute for a Disaster Resilient Texas (IDRT) Regents Professor, Marine and Coastal Environmental Science, College of Marine Sciences & Maritime Studies, Texas A&M University at Galveston · Professor. Urban Resilience.AI Lab, Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States.

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

This paper argues that AI-enabled analysis of street-view imagery, complemented by performance-gated machine-learning imputation, provides a viable pathway for generating building-specific elevation data at regional scale for flood risk assessment. We develop and apply a three-stage pipeline across 18 areas of interest (AOIs) in Texas that (1) extracts LFE and the height difference between street grade and the lowest floor (HDSL) from Google Street View imagery using the Elev-Vision framework, (2) imputes missing HDSL values with Random Forest and Gradient Boosting models trained on 16 terrain, hydrologic, geographic, and flood-exposure features, and (3) integrates the resulting elevation dataset with Fathom 1-in-100 year inundation surfaces and USACE depth-damage functions to estimate property-specific interior flood depth and expected loss. Across 12,241 residential structures, street-view imagery was available for 73.4% of parcels and direct LFE/HDSL extraction was successful for 49.0% (5,992 structures). Imputation was retained for 13 AOIs where cross-validated performance was defensible, with selected models achieving R suqre values from 0.159 to 0.974; five AOIs were explicitly excluded from prediction because performance was insufficient. The results show that street-view-based elevation mapping is not universally available for every property, but it is sufficiently scalable to materially improve regional flood-risk characterization by moving beyond hazard exposure to structure-level estimates of interior inundation and expected damage. Scientifically, the study advances LFE estimation from a pilot-scale proof of concept to a regional, end-to-end workflow. Practically, it offers a replicable framework for jurisdictions that lack comprehensive Elevation Certificates but need parcel-level information to support mitigation, planning, and flood-risk management.

More in this topic

Disaster Damage Assessment

Disaster damage assessment uses imagery and geospatial data to locate, classify, and quantify damage for emergency response and recovery.

See all 49 papers

Explore similar work

CardsList
Mar 17, 2026

LLM-Powered Flood Depth Estimation from Social Media Imagery: A Vision-Language Model Framework with Mechanistic Interpretability for Transportation Resilience

Urban flooding poses an escalating threat to transportation network continuity, yet no operational system currently provides real-time, street-level flood depth information at the centimeter resolution required for dynamic routing, electric vehicle (EV) safety, and autonomous vehicle (AV) operations. This study presents FloodLlama, a fine-tuned open-source vision-language model (VLM) for continuous flood depth estimation from single street-level images, supported by a multimodal sensing pipeline using TikTok data. A synthetic dataset of approximately 190000 images was generated, covering seven vehicle types, four weather conditions, and 41 depth levels (0-40 cm at 1 cm resolution). Progressive curriculum training enabled coarse-to-fine learning, while LLaMA 3.2-11B Vision was fine-tuned using QLoRA. Evaluation across 34797 trials reveals a depth-dependent prompt effect: simple prompts perform better for shallow flooding, whereas chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves performance at greater depths. FloodLlama achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) below 0.97 cm and Acc@5cm above 93.7% for deep flooding, exceeding 96.8% for shallow depths. A five-phase mechanistic interpretability framework identifies layer L23 as the critical depth-encoding transition and enables selective fine-tuning that reduces trainable parameters by 76-80% while maintaining accuracy. The Tier 3 configuration achieves 98.62% accuracy on real-world data and shows strong robustness under visual occlusion. A TikTok-based data pipeline, validated on 676 annotated flood frames from Detroit, demonstrates the feasibility of real-time, crowd-sourced flood sensing. The proposed framework provides a scalable, infrastructure-free solution with direct implications for EV safety, AV deployment, and resilient transportation management.

Nafis Fuad, Xiaodong Qian

Civil and Environmental Engineering Wayne State University 5050 Anthony Wayne Drive, Detroit, MI, USA, 48202 · Civil and Environmental Engineering Institute for AI and Data Science (AIDaS) Wayne State University 5050 Anthony Wayne Drive, Detroit, MI, USA, 48202

Depth EstimationIntelligent Transportation SystemsVLM InterpretabilityFlood Inundation Mapping
AskPDF
Aug 2, 2026

Mechanistic Interpretability-Guided Selective Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models for Centimeter-Level Flood Depth Estimation

Urban flooding poses an escalating threat to transportation infrastructure, yet no operational system provides real-time, street-level flood-depth estimates at centimeter resolution. This paper presents three vision-language models fine-tuned for continuous flood-depth estimation from street-level imagery: FloodLlama-Dense, a fully fine-tuned QLoRA baseline, and FloodLlama-MI5 and FloodLlama-MI6, interpretability-guided sparse variants that fine-tune only the top five and six causally relevant cross-attention layers identified through mechanistic interpretability analysis, respectively. Training uses an approximately 610,000-image subset of a 2.81-million-image synthetic corpus generated in Unreal Engine 5. The dataset combines single-vehicle subsets with 5 cm depth increments and mixed-vehicle subsets with 1 cm depth increments, spanning seven vehicle types, four weather conditions, and flood depths from 0 to 40 cm. FloodLlama-Dense achieves an MAE of 0.40 cm, an RMSE of 1.97 cm, and an Acc@5cm of 97.59%. Mechanistic interpretability analysis combining linear probing, logit lens, centered kernel alignment (CKA), and cross-attention entropy reveals a two-stage adaptation pattern: layers L13-L22 restructure visual representations, while depth first becomes linearly decodable at layer L23. FloodLlama-MI5 and FloodLlama-MI6 leverage this insight by fine-tuning only five or six of the eight cross-attention layers, achieving an 86-88% reduction in trainable parameters (6.55-7.86 million versus 54.4 million) with minimal accuracy loss. On a real-world benchmark, FloodLlama-MI6 achieves 98.62% accuracy, compared with 86.61% for the published STURM-FloodDepth baseline.

Nafis Fuad, Xiaodong Qian, Dongxiao Zhu

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Wayne State University Detroit, MI, USA · Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Institute for AI and Data Science (AIDaS) Wayne State University Detroit, MI, USA · Department of Computer Science, Institute for AI and Data Science (AIDaS) Wayne State University Detroit, MI, USA

VLM AdaptationDepth EstimationVLM InterpretabilityMechanistic InterpretabilityParameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
AskPDF
Jul 27, 2026

Physics-Informed CNN-LSTM for Street-Scale Urban Flood Prediction: Reconciling Aggregate Accuracy and Street-Level Plausibility

Deep learning surrogate models trained with mean-squared-error loss produce statistically accurate but physically unconstrained flood predictions: water may flow uphill, appear spontaneously, or smooth over street-level corridors. We develop a physics-informed training framework for CNN-LSTM models that predict urban flood depths at 15 min intervals over a 128x128 spatial grid. Three differentiable penalty terms are embedded into the loss: (i) a gravity loss penalizing depth increases against the water-surface-elevation gradient, (ii) a continuity loss enforcing local mass conservation with rainfall-adaptive thresholds, and (iii) a topography-aware false-alarm penalty modulated by the topographic wetness index (TWI). We evaluate on the Norfolk, Virginia flood dataset spanning two storm events (August 2017 and September 2022, 300 samples), with all variants trained on identical splits and robustness assessed over repeated random splits and leave-one-storm-out tests. A road-proximal evaluation restricted to a TWI-derived street mask quantifies street-level skill. The physics-constrained model achieves near-zero gravity violations (order 1e-6) and the highest street-channel recall (0.77 +/- 0.09 vs 0.44 +/- 0.10 for the unconstrained baseline), the capability most relevant to traffic routing, and its advantage more than doubles on a held-out storm; a uniform false-alarm variant attains 16% lower mean absolute error but suppresses street recall to 0.25. The TWI-modulated penalty reconciles this trade-off: it improves on the uniform variant on every metric, recovering 60% higher street recall at the lowest MAE among constrained variants and the best street-level F1. These results expose a fundamental tension between aggregate pixel-level error and application-specific physical plausibility, and show that terrain-aware loss modulation offers a principled resolution.

Luc DCosta, Yidi Wang, Jonathan L. Goodall +1

Chandra Robot Autonomy Lab, Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA · Link Lab, Multidisciplinary Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA · Hydroinformatics Research Group, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA

Convolutional RNNsFlood Inundation MappingPhysics-Informed MLFlood ForecastingHydrology
AskPDF