Camouflaged scene understanding (CSU) has attracted significant attention due to its broad practical implications. However, in this field, robust image-text cross-modal alignment remains under-explored, hindering deeper understanding of camouflaged scenarios and their related applications. To this end, we focus on the typical image-text retrieval task, and formulate a new task dubbed ``camouflage-aware image-text retrieval'' (CA-ITR). We first construct a dedicated camouflage image-text retrieval dataset (CamoIT), comprising ∼10.5K samples with multi-granularity textual annotations. Benchmark results conducted on CamoIT reveal the underlying challenges of CA-ITR for existing cutting-edge retrieval techniques, which are mainly caused by objects' camouflage properties as well as those complex image contents. As a solution, we propose a camouflage-expert collaborative network (CECNet), which features a dual-branch visual encoder: one branch captures holistic image representations, while the other incorporates a dedicated model to inject representations of camouflaged objects. A novel confidence-conditioned graph attention (C\textsuperscript{2}GA) mechanism is incorporated to exploit the complementarity across branches. Comparative experiments show that CECNet achieves ∼29% overall CA-ITR accuracy boost, surpassing seven representative retrieval models. The dataset and code will be available at https://github.com/jiangyao-scu/CA-ITR.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Qualitative results of three state-of-the-art (SOTA) retrieval methods ( i.e . , CLIP [ 50 ] , AVSE [ 40 ] , and D2S-VSE [ 39 ] ) on CA-ITR. Camouflaged objects in the images are marked with red bounding boxes. Below the dotted line are samples from the general ITR datasets ( i.e . , MS-COCO [ 36 ] and Flickr30K [ 63 ] ).
Figure 2: Data annotation process, an example, and statistical analyses of CamoIT.
Figure 3: The overall pipeline of the proposed CECNet and C 2 GA.
Models
Pub.
FG
BU
MS-COCO [ 36 ]
CamoIT
Flickr30K [ 63 ]
CamoIT
I2T
T2I
I2T
T2I
I2T
T2I
I2T
T2I
R@1
R@10
R@1
R@10
R@1
R@10
R@1
R@10
R@1
R@10
R@1
R@10
R@1
R@10
R@1
R@10
CFM [ 60 ]
22
✗
✓
59.6
92.9
42.7
83.4
10.7
26.0
10.7
26.7
82.7
98.2
62.6
92.0
5.4
16.5
6.5
18.9
HREM [ 18 ]
23
✗
✓
62.5
93.4
44.0
83.5
11.3
28.1
10.5
27.1
84.8
97.9
62.4
92.2
6.7
19.2
5.7
17.9
CHAN [ 46 ]
23
✓
✓
59.8
93.3
44.9
84.2
10.9
29.7
13.2
30.1
80.6
97.8
63.9
92.6
6.9
20.0
7.8
21.7
DBL [ 7 ]
24
✓
✓
57.5
91.6
41.3
80.9
7.1
20.0
8.7
23.5
78.2
97.4
58.7
89.5
4.5
14.2
3.7
13.6
Table 1: Quantitative results ( R@K , %) of models trained on MS-COCO [ 36 ] (left) and Flickr30K [ 63 ] (right). I2T means image-to-text retrieval, while T2I denotes text-to-image retrieval. “FG” and “BU” mean whether the model employs local alignment or utilizes the BUTD framework [ 2 ] . “N/A” means that the result is unavailable. The highest scores are marked in bold . “Pub.” denotes the publication year.
Models
I2T
T2I
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1
R@5
R@10
CFM [ 60 ]
30.8
59.9
70.3
28.9
57.2
68.3
HREM [ 18 ]
34.3
62.7
74.0
31.5
59.9
71.4
CUSA [ 22 ]
23.9
53.5
66.7
23.5
51.3
64.3
LAPS [ 19 ]
27.8
62.0
73.9
28.2
58.0
70.7
D2S-VSE [ 39 ]
37.1
68.4
79.5
35.5
67.5
78.4
Table 2: Quantitative results ( R@K , %) on CA-ITR. All models are retrained on CamoIT. The highest scores are marked in bold .
Figure 4: Qualitative results of CECNet (top, light purple) and CLIP (bottom, light orange) on sentence retrieval (left) and image retrieval (right). For each query, we present the top three relevant cross-modal instances. To enhance readability, we retain only the essential components of the sentence. The accurate, inaccurate, and ambiguous portions of the sentences in the search results are highlighted in green, red, and gray, respectively. Camouflaged objects are marked with red bounding boxes.
Settings
CamoIT
I2T
T2I
R@1
R@5
R@10
R@1
R@5
R@10
Baseline
41.3
69.2
79.0
41.1
67.7
78.4
A1
28.5
58.3
70.9
30.0
58.0
70.4
A2
42.1
69.9
79.2
41.2
69.5
79.0
A3
41.8
69.2
79.3
42.2
68.9
79.5
Table 3: Ablation study of R@K (%) on dual-branch visual encoder and C 2 GA. The highest scores are marked in bold .
COD Models
Retrieval
Segmentation
I2T
T2I
Sα
MAE
R@1
R@5
R@1
R@5
White
41.6
69.6
41.3
69.4
0.443
0.120
SINet [ 13 ]
42.3
70.4
42.1
69.9
0.808
0.049
SINet-v2 [ 12 ]
43.3
72.7
43.1
71.7
0.843
0.037
ZoomNet [ 47 ]
44.0
71.6
42.9
70.5
0.851
0.033
Table 4: Retrieval performance of CECNet and segmentation performance of corresponding COD models. “White” denotes the replacement of COD detection results with a white image. Segmentation performance is measured by Sα and MAE (see [ 11 ] ).
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is an important image retrieval paradigm that enables users to retrieve a target image using a multimodal query that consists of a reference image and modification text. Although research on CIR has made significant progress, prevailing setups still rely simple modification texts that typically cover only a limited range of salient changes, which induces two limitations highly relevant to practical applications, namely Insufficient Entity Coverage and Clause-Entity Misalignment. In order to address these issues and bring CIR closer to real-world use, we construct two instruction-rich multi-modification datasets, M-FashionIQ and M-CIRR. In addition, we propose TEMA, the Text-oriented Entity Mapping Architecture, which is the first CIR framework designed for multi-modification while also accommodating simple modifications. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that TEMA's superiority in both original and multi-modification scenarios, while maintaining an optimal balance between retrieval accuracy and computational efficiency. Our codes and constructed multi-modification dataset (M-FashionIQ and M-CIRR) are available at https://github.com/lee-zixu/ACL26-TEMA/.
Zixu Li, Yupeng Hu, Zhiheng Fu +3
School of Software, Shandong University · Department of Computing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University · School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)
Camouflaged Object Detection (COD) aims to segment objects that are highly integrated with the background in terms of color, texture, and structure, making it a highly challenging task in computer vision. Although existing methods introduce multi-scale fusion and attention mechanisms to alleviate the above issues, they generally lack the guidance of textual semantic priors, which limits the model's ability to focus on camouflaged regions in complex scenes. To address this issue, this paper proposes a Language-Guided Structure-Aware Network (LGSAN). Specifically, based on the visual backbone PVT-v2, we introduce CLIP to generate masks from text prompts and RGB images, thereby guiding the multi-scale features extracted by PVT-v2 to focus on potential target regions. On this foundation, we further design a Fourier Edge Enhancement Module (FEEM), which integrates multi-scale features with high-frequency information in the frequency domain to extract edge enhancement features. Furthermore, we propose a Structure-Aware Attention Module (SAAM) to effectively enhance the model's perception of object structures and boundaries. Finally, we introduce a Coarse-Guided Local Refinement Module (CGLRM) to enhance fine-grained reconstruction and boundary integrity of camouflaged object regions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method consistently achieves highly competitive performance across multiple COD datasets, validating its effectiveness and robustness.
Min Zhang
School of Artificial Intelligence, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, 401120, China
Cross-modal retrieval has been advanced by vision-language pre-trained models that encode images and texts into a shared dense embedding space. While dense representations effectively capture overall semantic similarity, they often obscure fine-grained visual-textual information needed for precise cross-modal matching. Recent methods introduce a learned sparse branch to complement dense matching with lexical evidence, but they rely on a redundant language-model token space and lack explicit grounding for sparse dimensions. We propose GRASP, a compact and grounded sparse learning framework that mines visual-textual concepts from the corpus. A lightweight sparse head is trained to predict concepts relevant to each image or text, yielding interpretable concept-level evidence that complements dense semantic matching. Extensive experiments show that GRASP improves retrieval accuracy over the state-of-the-art dense-sparse baselines while yielding a more compact and grounded sparse space.
Yoonseo Kim, Jungwoo Choi, Cheonyoung Park +3
Sungkyunkwan University South Korea · KT Corporation South Korea