Friends and Grandmothers in Silico: Localizing Entity Cells in Language Models

We reproduce and stress-test the work of Yu et al. (2023), who characterize how language models (LMs) arbitrate between memorized knowledge and contradictory in-context statements. We replicate their world-capitals experiments on 31 models spanning Pythia, GPT-2, Qwen3, and Ministral families, including base and post-trained variants, and extend evaluations to five additional knowledge relation types from the ParaConflict dataset. We empirically confirm most of their original findings: larger models and higher-frequency entities tend to favor memorized answers, with substantial family-level variance. However, several conclusions do not generalize cleanly: entity-frequency effects disappear on Qwen3-14B and 32B; post-training shifts the memory-context trade-off inconsistently across families; question phrasing alone can change a model's reliance on memorized knowledge by up to 80 percentage points; and semantically unrelated prose can mimic coherent supporting context. Our results clarify where Yu et al.'s claims hold and to what extent they generalize to other prompts.

Language models encode substantial factual knowledge in their parameters, which can lead to unreliable behavior when this knowledge is outdated, incomplete, or misaligned with the provided context. In this work, we study whether modifying the pretraining signal can systematically shift models away from parametric recall and toward evidence-grounded reasoning. We introduce Knowledge--''Less'' Language Models (KLLMs), a fundamentally different epistemic training paradigm for LLMs, which are pretrained on corpora in which named entities are anonymized, thereby removing a primary channel for entity-linked factual supervision. This intervention substantially reduces closed-book factual recall, while often improving performance on tasks where relevant information is provided as context. Across multiple model scales, KLLMs consistently outperform matched baselines on contextual question answering, fact verification, and hallucination detection benchmarks. Crucially, in retrieval-grounded settings with imperfect evidence, KLLMs show improved robustness and achieve up to 20--25% relative gains over standard language models. They further exhibit better calibration, with improved ECE, Brier score, and AUROC, as well as more reliable abstention behavior. Our results demonstrate that suppressing entity-linked supervision during pretraining induces a shift in epistemic behavior: KLLMs rely less on parametric knowledge and more on external evidence, leading to improved reliability under realistic conditions. This suggests that pretraining-time control over knowledge acquisition can complement retrieval-augmented and tool-based systems by providing a more evidence-sensitive base model.

Activation patching can identify a mixture-of-experts (MoE) block whose clean output restores a corrupted factual prediction. However, because the block output combines contributions from multiple routed experts, block-level rescue does not establish whether the recovery localizes to an individual expert or depends on the routed expert set. We study this question on single-token COUNTERFACT contrasts by corrupting subject-token embeddings, restoring clean block outputs, and then restoring clean-minus-noised expert updates under fixed routing. In Qwen3-30B-A3B-Base, a discovery sweep selects layer 44, and held-out analysis identifies L44E069 as a recurrent routed contributor with positive specificity over same-layer active experts. Its effect is fact-matched and improves true-token probability and rank, which explains part of the layer rescue. In Mixtral-8x7B-v0.1, the selected recurrent singleton is not specific; matched-size controls instead show specificity of the clean-routed top-2 set. These findings show that successful MoE-block restoration does not necessarily imply localization to a single expert.