Low-Burden LLM-Based Preference Learning: Personalizing Assistive Robots from Natural Language Feedback for Users with Paralysis

Robotic systems that assist humans should be capable of adapting their behaviors to individual user preferences. For instance, users may want a robot arm to adjust the amount of force it applies while folding their laundry or cleaning furniture. Natural language provides an intuitive way for humans to communicate such preferences. Recent progress in language-conditioned robot policies has shown that robots can successfully use language prompts to determine what task to perform. However, extending the same approach to realize how the task should be performed requires detailed labels describing the preferences or styles of trajectories in the task data. Not only is collecting such annotations challenging, but conditioning directly on these labels may also fail to provide fine-grained control over a continuous range of behaviors. For example, it can be difficult to convey the exact force that a robot must apply through abstract instructions like "apply a bit more pressure than before". Therefore, in this work, we propose using language to reason over preferred behaviors instead of directly generating them. We first learn a structured latent representation that organizes user preferences according to differences in the corresponding trajectories. Then, given a preference prompt, we use a foundation model to interpret this latent space and choose a value that produces the desired behavior. Through both simulation and real-world experiments, we show that selecting robot behaviors from an intuitively structured latent space enables more precise adaptation to user preferences while requiring significantly fewer preference labels than language-conditioned policies.

Existing LLM-driven robot task planners rely on a taken-for-granted assumption of an ideal user whose instructions are clear, complete, and task-focused. However, when interacting with real-world users, especially those experiencing cognitive impairments, such as people living with dementia (PLWD), the planners often make mistakes and even pose physical safety risks. We proposed TALK-Dem (Talking Attributes and Linguistic Knowledge in Dementia), the first benchmark for evaluating LLM-driven robot task planning under dementia-associated verbal communication. TALK-Dem contains 4,800 instructions and covers five typical communication patterns, including Referential Imprecision, Object Substitution, Empty Speech, Topic Drift, and Intrusion, at three intensity levels. Experiments across six open-weight LLMs reveal a substantial robustness gap. Across communication patterns, open-weight models exhibited performance drops of up to 22.3 percentage points compared to ideal instructions. This revealed a critical gap and even danger for real-world applications, especially in assistive robotics, where locally deployable models are necessary due to privacy concerns and connectivity constraints. To mitigate this issue, we proposed the Context-Aware Retrieval from Experience (CARE) method, which retrieves relevant previously resolved tasks to provide task-specific interpretation and planning context. CARE generally outperformed standard prompting baselines across the six open-weight models, improving average task success by 18.1 percentage points over the vanilla prompt. These results highlighted the importance of both evaluating communication robustness and developing effective adaptation strategies for locally deployable assistive robots. The TALK-Dem dataset is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TALK-Dem-A6B3/.

Personalization is essential for general-purpose robots to transition into household environments and achieve true practicality. While general robotic manipulation has been extensively studied, personalized robotic manipulation (PeRM) lacks a controlled benchmark for separating task completion from preference satisfaction. We introduce LIBERO-PeRM, a benchmark for preference learning in embodied agents. LIBERO-PeRM studies five questions: 1) how policies follow preferences in zero-shot settings; 2) how they learn single preferences from demonstrations; 3) how efficiently they acquire preferences as demonstrations increase; 4) how learned preferences generalize across layouts and tasks; and 5) how policies compose preferences and behave under conflicts. We propose a controlled formulation and taxonomy of observable preferences in simulation, covering motion, skill, and user-profile choices. This formulation is restricted to language-expressible preferences that can be instantiated in LIBERO without changing the task goal, evaluated automatically, and reused across tasks. Building on LIBERO, our procedural pipeline generates paired demonstrations with and without preferences. We create five task suites (312 tasks) with high-quality demonstrations, rich metadata, and preference-satisfaction metrics. Experiments show that current VLA policies struggle with zero-shot personalization, while SFT makes preferences learnable. Mixed training achieves better no-preference retention than sequential adaptation and improves performance with contextual prompts compared with preference-only training, but can weaken motion-preference learning; preference generalization, decomposition, and conflict handling remain difficult. The code, datasets, and demos can be found on the project website: https://libero-perm.github.io/.