cs.CLApr 3, 2026

Are Arabic Benchmarks Reliable? QIMMA's Quality-First Approach to LLM Evaluation

Authors: Leen AlQadi, Ahmed Alzubaidi, Mohammed Alyafeai, Hamza Alobeidli, Maitha Alhammadi, Shaikha Alsuwaidi, Omar Alkaabi, Basma El Amel Boussaha, 

Organizations: Technology Innovation Institute, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Abstract

We present QIMMA, a quality-assured Arabic LLM leaderboard that places systematic benchmark validation at its core. Rather than aggregating existing resources as-is, QIMMA applies a multi-model assessment pipeline combining automated LLM judgment with human review to surface and resolve systematic quality issues in well-established Arabic benchmarks before evaluation. The result is a curated, multi-domain, multi-task evaluation suite of over 52k samples, grounded predominantly in native Arabic content; code evaluation tasks are the sole exception, as they are inherently language-agnostic. Transparent implementation via LightEval, EvalPlus and public release of per-sample inference outputs make QIMMA a reproducible and community-extensible foundation for Arabic NLP evaluation.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. AraDynFact: Dynamic Evaluation of Factual Knowledge in Arabic

    Sep 28, 2026Ignacio Iacobacci, Faroq Altam, Zhaozhi Qian +1LLM EvaluationArabic NLP

  2. Mizan: A National Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Iraqi Arabic and the Iraqi Civic Context

    Sep 12, 2026Nawar S. Alseelawi, Mustafa S. AljumailyLLM EvaluationArabic NLP

  3. Evaluation of Small Language Models for Arabic Language Processing

    Jun 19, 2026Jumana Alsubhi, Ahmed Alhusayni, Abdulrahman Gharawi +5Arabic NLPSmall Language Models