Active multi-target tracking requires a mobile robot to balance exploration for undetected targets with exploitation of uncertain tracked ones. Diffusion policies have emerged as a powerful approach for capturing diverse behavioral strategies by learning action sequences from expert demonstrations. However, existing methods implicitly select among strategies through the denoising process, without uncertainty quantification over which strategy to execute. We formulate expert selection for diffusion policies as an offline contextual bandit problem and propose a Bayesian framework for pessimistic, uncertainty-aware strategy selection. A multi-head Variational Bayesian Last Layer (VBLL) model predicts the expected tracking performance of each expert strategy given the current belief state, providing both a point estimate and predictive uncertainty. Following the pessimism principle for offline decision-making, a Lower Confidence Bound (LCB) criterion then selects the expert whose worst-case predicted performance is best, avoiding overcommitment to experts with unreliable predictions. The selected expert conditions a diffusion policy to generate corresponding action sequences. Experiments on simulated indoor tracking scenarios demonstrate that our approach outperforms both the base diffusion policy and standard gating methods, including Mixture-of-Experts selection and deterministic regression baselines.
Figures & tables
Method
RMSE ↓
NLL ↓
Entropy ↓
Rule-based execution
Track-rule
499.96±154.04
14.48±1.25
13.41
Reacq-rule
486.02±141.84
14.43±1.11
13.38
Explore-rule
481.80±144.9
14.24±1.20
13.17
Random-rule
486.90±138.8
14.31±1.05
13.20
VBLL-rule (ours)
472.90±129.14
13.83±1.13
12.78
TABLE I: Tracking performance over 5 episodes. Best and second-best results marked within each category.
Fig. 1: Trajectory comparison on a representative episode with three targets (marked by colored diamonds).
Selection Strategy
RMSE ↓
NLL ↓
Entropy ↓
VBLL-Greedy (mean)
500.29±102.79
14.98±0.35
13.48
VBLL-UCB
491.01±141.84
14.69±1.61
13.44
VBLL-TS
484.1±105.1
14.35±0.79
13.33
VBLL-LCB
480.80±107.27
14.06±0.89
13.01
TABLE II: Ablation on expert selection strategy.
λ
RMSE ↓
NLL ↓
Entropy ↓
0 (Greedy)
500.29±102.79
14.98±0.35
13.48
0.1
490.55±117.29
14.36±1.30
13.19
1
480.80±107.27
14.06±0.89
13.01
3
489.72±106.29
14.03±0.93
12.94
TABLE III: Sensitivity to pessimism coefficient λ in LCB selection.
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, Italy. · Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany.