Do Robots Need Body Language? Comparing Communication Modalities for Legible Motion Intent in Human-Shared Spaces

Effective robot-to-human communication can increase transparency and trust, reduce uncertainty, and contribute to safer collaboration in shared workspaces. Designing and validating an effective robot communication strategy is challenging due to the varying and often limited communication modalities across robots, differences in how diverse recipients interpret messages, and the underexplored virtual-to-real gap in studies of communication legibility. We present a systematic, large-scale comparative validation of existing communication strategies for a mobile non-humanoid robot across message types and settings (online and in-person). Based on the prescribed message types in the existing standards for industrial robots, we realize and compare a low-expressive, unimodal LED-based strategy with a highly expressive, multimodal one that leverages robotic gaze, gestures, and voice. For each strategy, we analyze the communication of a turning intention, an attention request, error status, whether the robot is stuck, and whether it is functioning normally. We evaluate these strategies in replicated online and in-person experiments. We find strong evidence that highly expressive multimodal communication is perceived as more legible and intuitive than unimodal LED-based communication. Comparing the online and real-world study findings, we observe a notable decrease in overall legibility, particularly for signaling with LEDs. Similarly, confidence in message interpretation decreases during the real-world evaluation.

Robots operating in human-robot collaboration must communicate not only their intended actions but also uncertainty arising from incomplete or ambiguous perception. This work introduces a mathematical framework for expressing perceptual uncertainty through robotic manipulator motion. Drawing on Laban Movement Analysis, robot behavior is organized in a Commitment-Vigilance state space that maps uncertainty-related states - confidence, curiosity, hesitance, fear, and inactivity - to distinct Laban Effort signatures. Five motion primitives - approach, pause, retreat, exploration, and oscillation - are then parameterized using eleven kinematic and geometric descriptors, including acceleration, pause and retreat characteristics, gaze angles, tilt, and shiver amplitude. A video-based human-subject study evaluated recognition of four expressive trajectories and the influence of individual descriptors on perceived intensity. Participants reliably identified the intended behavioral states, while several descriptors significantly modulated expressiveness. The results establish a perceptually grounded basis for encoding robot uncertainty in motion and support future autonomous trajectory generation using parametric movement representations for collaborative tasks in shared environments. Code, videos, questionnaire and appendices are available at "https://bit.ly/github-aou".

We focus on legible robot motion generation in social navigation settings. Legibility in human-robot interaction (HRI) is often described as the property of robot motion that enables an observer to confidently infer the robot's intent. While mature frameworks exist for generating legible motion in front of static observers, social robot navigation presents a new challenge: the robot must clearly convey its intent while ensuring human safety in dynamic pedestrian environments where human attention is often divided. With the goal of enabling robots to generate legible motion in dynamic and constrained spaces, we investigate how the choice of representation and the level of human attention shape navigation performance and human impressions. Focusing on the ubiquitous and demanding scenario of hallway navigation, we conduct two controlled user studies involving alternative legibility formulations implemented within a shared model predictive control framework. Study 1 (N = 45) investigates the role of intent representation, showing that passing-side legibility, particularly when adaptively updated, leads to smoother human motion and is perceived as more competent and less mentally and physically demanding than destination-based and non-legible baselines. Study 2 (N = 45) examines the effect of pedestrian attention, demonstrating that legible motion allows for smooth human motion even under distraction, even if this is not consistently reflected in subjective ratings. Together, these findings suggest that effective legible motion in social robot navigation benefits from interaction-level intent representations that support coordination, with some effects persisting even when human attention is divided. Code is available at https://github.com/fluentrobotics/Legible_MPPI.