Organizations: College of Science, Northwest Agriculture & Forestry University, Yangling 712100, China · Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, School of Optics and Photonics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China · State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Single-pixel imaging (SPI) offers a cost-effective route to hyperspectral acquisition but struggles to recover high-fidelity spatial and spectral details under extremely low sampling rates, a severely ill-posed inverse problem. While deep learning has shown potential, existing data-driven methods demand large-scale pretraining datasets that are often impractical in hyperspectral imaging. To overcome this limitation, we propose an end-to-end physics-informed framework that leverages untrained neural networks and RGB guidance for joint hyperspectral reconstruction and super-resolution without any external training data. The framework comprises three physically grounded stages: (1) a Regularized Least-Squares method with RGB-derived Grayscale Priors (LS-RGP) that initializes the solution by exploiting cross-modal structural correlations; (2) an Untrained Hyperspectral Recovery Network (UHRNet) that refines the reconstruction through measurement consistency and hybrid regularization; and (3) a Transformer-based Untrained Super-Resolution Network (USRNet) that upsamples the spatial resolution via cross-modal attention, transferring high-frequency details from the RGB guide. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly surpasses state-of-the-art algorithms in both reconstruction accuracy and spectral fidelity. Moreover, a proof-of-concept experiment using a physical single-pixel imaging system validates the framework's practical applicability, successfully reconstructing a 144-band hyperspectral data cube at a mere 6.25% sampling rate. The proposed method thus provides a robust, data-efficient solution for computational hyperspectral imaging.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The overall architecture of the proposed RGB-guided hyperspectral reconstruction framework. (a) End-to-end pipeline integrating SPI physics, RGB guidance, and untrained neural networks. (b) UHRNet: RGB-guided hyperspectral recovery network. (c) USRNet: transformer-based hyperspectral super-resolution network. (d) Head module for feature mapping. (e) Encoder with multi-head attention. (f) SEBlock for channel-wise attention. (g) ConvBlock with convolution and normalization layers.
Figure 2: Comparison of hyperspectral reconstruction quality across different methods for Bands 1, 16, and 21. Grayscale heatmaps visualize spatial fidelity. From left to right: Ground Truth (GT), DGI, GISC, TVAL3, GIDC, PYFINETUNE, MST++, and Ours. PSNR and SSIM values are displayed. Our method consistently achieves higher metrics and superior visual quality.
Figure 3: Performance under different SNR conditions at 6.25% sampling rate. (a) Average PSNR, (b) average SSIM, and (c) average SAM for each method. Our approach shows significantly better noise resilience.
Figure 4: Overall performance comparison in terms of PSNR and SAM. Our method achieves the best trade-off, indicating superior reconstruction fidelity and spectral preservation.
Figure 5: Effect of the number of measurement patterns on performance metrics (PSNR, SSIM, SAM) for our method and PYFINETUNE.
Figure 6: Visual comparison for Bands 9, 15, and 31 using only 4 patterns. Our method yields clearer textures and higher fidelity metrics.
Figure 7: Spectral recovery comparison for two pixels (marked in the RGB image) at 6.25% sampling. Our method (red) aligns best with the ground truth (blue), exhibiting the lowest SAM values.
Figure 8: Super-resolution reconstruction for Bands 10, 15, and 20. Our method delivers superior visual quality and objective metrics.
Method
PSNR (dB)
SSIM
SAM (°)
SAM (rad)
Ours
35.0147
0.9571
7.5949
0.1326
DGI
8.3223
0.0519
27.0787
0.4726
GIDC
22.7902
0.5758
22.9502
0.4006
GISC
9.9916
0.3472
27.2265
0.4752
TVAL3
13.2984
0.0991
89.9110
1.5692
PYFINETUNE
26.2854
0.6361
14.5766
0.2544
Table 1: Super-resolution performance comparison. Our method excels across all metrics.
Figure 9: ROI comparison: the RGB image with marked ROI (top left) and enlarged reconstructions from each method versus ground truth. Our result exhibits the finest detail preservation.
Configuration
PSNR (dB)
SSIM
SAM (°)
SAM (rad)
Full model
38.1406
0.9670
7.3064
0.1275
w/o measurement loss
25.5383
0.8616
21.2551
0.3710
w/o Fourier reg.
36.5002
0.9546
12.5095
0.2183
w/o sharpness loss
29.2406
0.8379
29.4664
0.5143
w/o smoothness loss
37.3611
0.9602
12.3805
0.2161
w/o perceptual loss
14.6182
0.5841
19.8794
0.3470
Table 2: Ablation study for RGB-guided hyperspectral recovery. Each loss term positively impacts performance.
Configuration
PSNR (dB)
SSIM
SAM (°)
SAM (rad)
Full model (Baseline)
35.01
0.9571
7.59
0.1326
Architecture:
no transformer blocks
32.43
0.9400
10.87
0.1896
shallow (depth=4)
34.64
0.9558
7.64
0.1334
fewer heads (heads=2)
33.64
0.9457
8.66
0.1512
narrow (dim=64)
34.77
0.9560
7.58
0.1323
Table 3: Ablation study for super-resolution network. The transformer architecture and RGB guidance are essential for high-quality upsampling.
Figure 10: Schematic of the real-world SPHI system. Broadband illumination from the DLP projector is structured by random patterns. Reflected light from the target enters a beam splitter; the left path is captured by the RGB camera (equipped with a 16 × lens), and the straight path is directed to the spectrometer via a 25 × lens and a 40 × microscope objective.
Figure 11: Photograph of the experimental setup showing key components: DLP projector, beam splitter (BS), RGB camera (RGB Cam), collection lens (Lens), microscope objective (Obj.), and fiber spectrometer (Spec.).
Parameter
Value
Spatial resolution
128×128 pixels
Number of patterns ( M )
1024
Sampling rate ( β )
6.25%
Spectral range
380–720 nm
Number of bands ( B )
144
Spectral interval
≈ 2.4 nm
Table 4: Key parameters of the real-world experimental system.
Figure 12: Spectral fidelity analysis. (a) RGB image with five target locations marked. (b)–(f) Ground truth (blue) vs. reconstructed spectra (red) for each target, with Pearson correlation r and SAM annotated.
Target
Pixel
r (raw)
r (SG)
SAM (SG)
Target 1
(51, 100)
0.899
0.913
17.6 ∘
Target 2
(73, 33)
0.946
0.967
16.3 ∘
Target 3
(104, 55)
0.887
0.909
21.9 ∘
Target 4
(27, 76)
0.813
0.871
28.8 ∘
Target 5
(50, 65)
0.869
0.885
25.6 ∘
Mean
—
0.883
0.909
22.0 ∘
Table 5: Quantitative spectral fidelity metrics for the five targets. SG smoothing enhances correlation and reduces SAM.
Figure 13: Visualization of the reconstructed 128×128×144 hyperspectral data cube from real measurements, covering 380–720 nm.
Hyperspectral imaging is a powerful bioimaging tool which can uncover novel insights, thanks to its sensitivity to the intrinsic properties of materials. However, this enhanced contrast comes at the cost of system complexity, constrained by an inherent trade-off between spatial, spectral, and temporal resolution. To overcome this limitation, we present a self-supervised deep learning-based approach that restores and enhances pixel resolution post-acquisition without requiring external training data beyond the images to be restored. Fine-tuned using metrics aligned with the imaging model, our physics-aware method achieves a 16× pixel super-resolution enhancement and a 12× imaging speedup without the need of additional training data for transfer learning. Applied to both synthetic and experimental data from five different sample types, including healthy and diseased tissues, we demonstrate that the model preserves biological integrity, as we did not detect systematic loss of biological features or biologically consequential hallucinations in tested datasets. We also concretely demonstrate the model's ability to reveal disease-associated metabolic changes that would otherwise remain undetectable. Furthermore, we provide physical insights into the model's inner workings, paving the way for future refinements that could potentially reveal novel high resolution features in an explainable manner. All methods are available as open-source software on GitHub.
Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK · Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK · Department of Clinical Neurosciences and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK +4
Compact snapshot hyperspectral cameras provide rich instantaneous spectral measurements for ground-level machine vision, but at lower spatial resolution than standard RGB cameras. RGB-guided hyperspectral super-resolution (HSR) addresses this limitation by transferring spatial detail from a high-resolution RGB guide to a low-resolution hyperspectral image (HSI). These dual-camera systems are typically in a horizontal rig geometry, requiring cross-camera image alignment due to different fields of view. However, residual misregistration can inject spurious high-frequency details. Existing learned unaligned-fusion methods are usually trained for a fixed spectral support and spatial scale factors and can be computationally demanding, limiting their flexibility across sensors. We propose a lightweight and interpretable RGB-guided HSR framework combining cross-modal flow alignment with model-based Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization fusion. The method first warps the RGB guide onto the HSI grid, then estimates an energy-based confidence weight map by measuring local alignment reliability. This map is then used both in a weighted least-squares spectral regression and in a gated fusion between the super-resolved estimate and an HSI-preserving estimate. Unlike existing learned methods, the proposed framework has a low computational footprint and supports VIS-NIR spectral supports and scale factors without retraining. Experiments on the Real benchmark show that the proposed method improves reconstruction accuracy over learned fusion baselines while remaining substantially faster. On a 34-frame sequence acquired with our real RGB-HSI dual-camera setup, a reduced-resolution quantitative evaluation validates the method under genuine cross-sensor radiometric, noise, and geometric differences, while native-resolution qualitative results demonstrate deployment on the full 51-band VIS-NIR acquisition.
Mohamad Jouni, Aurélien Godet, Mauro Dalla Mura
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS Grenoble INP, GIPSA-Lab 38000 Grenoble, France · Institut Universitaire de France (IUF) Paris, France
Unregistered hyperspectral image (HSI) super-resolution (SR) typically aims to enhance a low-resolution HSI using an unregistered high-resolution reference image. In this paper, we propose an unmixing-based fusion framework that decouples spatial-spectral information to simultaneously mitigate the impact of unregistered fusion and enhance the learnability of SR models. Specifically, we first utilize singular value decomposition for initial spectral unmixing, preserving the original endmembers while dedicating the subsequent network to enhancing the initial abundance map. To leverage the spatial texture of the unregistered reference, we introduce a coarse-to-fine deformable aggregation module, which first estimates a pixel-level flow and a similarity map using a coarse pyramid predictor. It further performs fine sub-pixel refinement to achieve deformable aggregation of the reference features. The aggregative features are then refined via a series of spatial-channel abundance cross-attention blocks. Furthermore, a spatial-channel modulated fusion module is presented to merge encoder-decoder features using dynamic gating weights, yielding a high-quality, high-resolution HSI. Experimental results on simulated and real datasets confirm that our proposed method achieves state-of-the-art super-resolution performance. The code will be available at https://github.com/yingkai-zhang/UAFL.
Yingkai Zhang, Tao Zhang, Jing Nie +1
Beijing Institute of Technology · Hangzhou Dianzi University