CRFT: Consistent-Recurrent Feature Flow Transformer for Cross-Modal Image Registration
Organizations: Northeastern University, China · National University of Defense Technology, China
Abstract
We present Consistent-Recurrent Feature Flow Transformer (CRFT), a unified coarse-to-fine framework based on feature flow learning for robust cross-modal image registration. CRFT learns a modality-independent feature flow representation within a transformer-based architecture that jointly performs feature alignment and flow estimation. The coarse stage establishes global correspondences through multi-scale feature correlation, while the fine stage refines local details via hierarchical feature fusion and adaptive spatial reasoning. To enhance geometric adaptability, an iterative discrepancy-guided attention mechanism with a Spatial Geometric Transform (SGT) recurrently refines the flow field, progressively capturing subtle spatial inconsistencies and enforcing feature-level consistency. This design enables accurate alignment under large affine and scale variations while maintaining structural coherence across modalities. Extensive experiments on diverse cross-modal datasets demonstrate that CRFT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art registration methods in both accuracy and robustness. Beyond registration, CRFT provides a generalizable paradigm for multimodal spatial correspondence, offering broad applicability to remote sensing, autonomous navigation, and medical imaging. Code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/NEU-Liuxuecong/CRFT.
Figures & tables
| Methods | AEPE | CMR (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOWP [ 64 ] ISPRS’23 | 26.91 | 14.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| LNIFT [ 22 ] TGRS’22 | 48.18 | 22.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| MSG [ 66 ] TGRS’25 | 44.38 | 28.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| RIFT2 [ 20 ] TIP’20 | 23.61 | 22.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| GMFlow [ 58 ] TPAMI’23 | 11.91 | 17.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Methods | AEPE | CMR (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOWP [ 64 ] ISPRS’23 | 22.01 | 31.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| LNIFT [ 22 ] TGRS’22 | 24.24 | 30.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| MSG [ 66 ] TGRS’25 | 50.87 | 45.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| RIFT2 [ 20 ] TIP’20 | 17.27 | 36.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| GMFlow [ 58 ] TPAMI’23 | 12.02 | 18.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Method | AEPE | CMR (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) X | 3.76 | 23.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| (2) X+L1 | 0.51 | 80.9 | 73.3 | 66.7 |
| (3) X+FE+L1 | 0.63 | 99.0 | 93.4 | 73.3 |
| (4) X+FE+IDGO+L1 | 0.43 | 99.7 | 97.2 | 88.9 |
| (5) X+FE+IDGO+IL (CRFT) | 0.40 | 99.7 | 97.2 | 93.1 |
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.