Constraint-Driven Warm-Freeze for Efficient Transfer Learning in Photovoltaic Systems

Modern pretrained vision models achieve strong accuracy but demand substantial GPU memory for fine-tuning, making edge deployment impractical. This paper compares five parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods (Full FT, LoRA, AdaLoRA, QLoRA, BitFit) on Transformers- (ViT-Small, TinyViT) and Mamba-based vision backbones (Vim-Small, MambaVision-T) under an on-device VRAM budget (e.g., 2 GB), together with three gradient-checkpointing strategies (none, static, and a proposed memory-budget-aware adaptive algorithm); and we evaluate three families of foundation-model baselines: zero-shot contrastive vision language models (OpenCLIP, SigLIP), self-supervised vision backbones with lightweight evaluation protocols (DINOv2), and autoregressive VLMs for prompt-based classification (PaliGemma, MobileVLM, SmolVLM). Experiments on CIFAR-100 and DTD report accuracy, training time, energy, and the NetScore family of multi-objective metrics, which we extend with two deployment-aware variants. QLoRA and BitFit cut energy 20-30% at a 1-2% accuracy cost; the adaptive algorithm reduces peak memory 43-79% with 9-30% energy overhead. DINOv2 surpasses fine-tuned models on CIFAR-100 (0.917 vs. 0.897) at a fraction of the energy, while small autoregressive VLMs remain uncompetitive.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) has become the de facto standard for adapting Vision Transformers (ViTs) to downstream tasks. While parameter count has been the dominant efficiency metric in PEFT, it does not imply compute efficiency: parameter-sparse methods can still incur full-model training cost per step, and typically need long schedules to reach peak accuracy. We introduce Circuit Fine-Tuning (CFT), a compute-efficient framework that uses circuit discovery---conventionally used to explain trained models---to select modules for fine-tuning before training. Whereas attribution is conventionally formulated against a trained task head, we formulate it against a near-zero-initialized probe head, which isolates the response of the backbone to the target distribution rather than the preferences of a particular classifier. CFT then fine-tunes only the recovered subgraph. CFT needs no learning-rate warmup and reaches peak accuracy in ${\sim}20$ epochs on average---versus $44$--$96$ for strong PEFT baselines---yielding $2.3$--$6.6\times$ fewer training FLOPs and up to $16\times$ less wall-clock time, while adding zero parameters and no inference operations. Experiments across a standard visual transfer benchmark (VTAB-1k), hierarchical backbones (Swin), domain-shifted medical imaging (CBIS-DDSM), and a vision-language model (Gemma-3 on CUB-200) demonstrate the effectiveness of CFT. Code is available at https://github.com/UriKialy/CFT

On-device tuning of deep neural networks enables long-term adaptation at the edge while preserving data privacy. However, the high computational and memory demands of backpropagation pose significant challenges for ultra-low-power, memory-constrained extreme-edge devices. These challenges are further amplified for attention-based models due to their architectural complexity and computational scale. We present TrainDeeploy, a framework that unifies efficient inference and on-device training on heterogeneous ultra-low-power System-on-Chips (SoCs). TrainDeeploy provides the first complete on-device training pipeline for extreme-edge SoCs supporting both Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Transformer models, together with multiple training strategies such as selective layer-wise fine-tuning and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). On a RISC-V-based heterogeneous SoC, we demonstrate the first end-to-end on-device fine-tuning of a Compact Convolutional Transformer (CCT), achieving up to 11 trained images per second. We show that LoRA reduces dynamic memory usage by 23%, decreases the number of trainable parameters and gradients by 15x, and reduces memory transfer volume by 1.6x compared to full backpropagation. TrainDeeploy achieves up to 4.6 FLOP/cycle on CCT (0.28M parameters, 71-126M FLOPs) and up to 13.4 FLOP/cycle on Deep-AE (0.27M parameters, 0.8M FLOPs), while expanding the scope of prior frameworks to support both CNN and Transformer models with parameter-efficient tuning on extreme-edge platforms.