The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data for Recommender Systems

Offline evaluation of recommender systems is often affected by hidden, under-documented choices in data preparation. Seemingly minor decisions in filtering, handling repeats, cold-start treatment, and splitting strategy design can substantially reorder model rankings and undermine reproducibility and cross-paper comparability. In this paper, we introduce SplitLight, an open-source exploratory toolkit that enables researchers and practitioners designing preprocessing and splitting pipelines or reviewing external artifacts to make these decisions measurable, comparable, and reportable. Given an interaction log and derived split subsets, SplitLight analyzes core and temporal dataset statistics, characterizes repeat consumption patterns and timestamp anomalies, and diagnoses split validity, including temporal leakage, cold-user/item exposure, and distribution shifts. SplitLight further allows side-by-side comparison of alternative splitting strategies through comprehensive aggregated summaries and interactive visualizations. Delivered as both a Python toolkit and an interactive no-code interface, SplitLight produces audit summaries that justify evaluation protocols and support transparent, reliable, and comparable experimentation in recommender systems research and industry.

Offline evaluation is the dominant experimental paradigm in recommender systems research, enabling reproducible and cost-effective comparisons on historical interaction data. Yet, while considerable attention has been devoted to recommendation models and evaluation methodologies, the data processing decisions that precede model training have received less scrutiny. These decisions determine the information available to recommendation algorithms and can affect the comparability and reproducibility of experimental results. This survey provides a systematic, cross-domain characterisation of data processing practices for the offline evaluation of recommender systems. We examine the data-centric pipeline, from dataset selection and interaction representation to data preparation, multimodal feature extraction, and train-validation-test splitting. Our analysis spans recommendation paradigms, including collaborative, sequential, session-based, graph-based, knowledge-aware, context-aware, multimodal, federated, cross-domain, contrastive-learning, and LLM-based recommendation. Beyond reviewing existing practices, we introduce a unified framework and taxonomy for describing data transformations and feature-extraction strategies, distinguishing data preparation from the extraction of representations from multimodal side information. Our empirical analysis reveals a landscape dominated by a narrow set of dataset-level transformations, particularly support-driven filtering, while representation-dependent transformations remain less common. We further identify substantial heterogeneity in how auxiliary information is prepared and represented, as well as inconsistencies in the specification of data splitting protocols, where similar labels may conceal different experimental conditions.

Large-scale neural recommender systems are typically trained with a softmax cross-entropy objective over the full item vocabulary. For a typical large number of possible items $K$, the final classification layer dominates memory, requiring $O(nK)$ logits and gradients to materialize for a batch of $n$ examples. Sampled softmax reduces this cost by restricting the objective to only $k \ll K$ candidate negative items, resulting in an $O(nk)$ memory. However, for a fixed budget $B = n k$, it remains unclear whether one should prioritize larger batches or the inclusion of more negative items. We address this question by analyzing sampled-softmax training under a fixed memory constraint. Under standard smoothness and variance assumptions, our theoretical evidence suggests that the fastest convergence arises from an $n \sim B, k \sim 1$ allocation. So, an actionable rule is to include as many objects as possible given computational constraints. Our theory is supported by controlled synthetic and synthetic and four real sequential recommendation benchmarks, including MovieLens-20M. The suggested configuration achieve faster convergence and better final recommendation quality than imbalanced alternatives within the same memory constraint. These findings provide a theoretical and empirical foundation for configuring memory during the training of recommender systems. Code, reproducibility materials, and all scripts for generating figures are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LimitedMemoryRule-BBFB