Adapting Foundation Models for Annotation-Efficient Adnexal Mass Segmentation in Cine Images
Organizations: Mayo Clinic · Politecnico di Milano · Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
Abstract
Adnexal mass evaluation via ultrasound is a challenging clinical task, often hindered by subjective interpretation and significant inter-observer variability. While automated segmentation is a foundational step for quantitative risk assessment, traditional fully supervised convolutional architectures frequently require large amounts of pixel-level annotations and struggle with domain shifts common in medical imaging. In this work, we propose a label-efficient segmentation framework that leverages the robust semantic priors of a pretrained DINOv3 foundational vision transformer backbone. By integrating this backbone with a Dense Prediction Transformer (DPT)-style decoder, our model hierarchically reassembles multi-scale features to combine global semantic representations with fine-grained spatial details. Evaluated on a clinical dataset of 7,777 annotated frames from 112 patients, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to established fully supervised baselines, including U-Net, U-Net++, DeepLabV3, and MAnet. Specifically, we obtain a Dice score of 0.945 and improved boundary adherence, reducing the 95th-percentile Hausdorff Distance by 11.4% relative to the strongest convolutional baseline. Furthermore, we conduct an extensive efficiency analysis demonstrating that our DINOv3-based approach retains significantly higher performance under data starvation regimes, maintaining strong results even when trained on only 25% of the data. These results suggest that leveraging large-scale self-supervised foundations provides a promising and data-efficient solution for medical image segmentation in data-constrained clinical environments. Project Repository: https://github.com/FrancescaFati/MESA
Figures & tables
| Method | Dice | IoU | Sens. | HD95 | MSD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 224 | 512 | 224 | 512 | 224 | 512 | 224 | 512 | 224 | 512 | |
| U-Net | 0.939 | 0.880 | 0.884 | 0.785 | 0.942 | 0.833 | 11.13 | 65.886 | 2.664 | 20.405 |
| U-Net++ | 0.935 | 0.875 | 0.878 | 0.778 | 0.937 | 0.823 | 10 | 65 | 2.703 | 20.143 |
| DeepLabV3 | 0.916 | 0.932 | 0.845 | 0.872 | 0.934 | 0.949 | 12 | 18.868 | 3.526 | 5.842 |
| MAnet | 0.924 | 0.932 | 0.859 | 0.873 | 0.941 | 0.953 | 10.851 | 21.201 | 3.18 | 6.378 |
| OURS | 0.945 | 0.937 | 0.897 | 0.882 | 0.956 | 0.956 | 8.861 | 18.455 | 2.288 | 5.323 |
| Retention Index | |||||
| Method | Dice | IoU | Sens | HD95 | MSD |
| UNet | 0.884 | 0.803 | 0.808 | 0.381 | 0.300 |
| UNet++ | 0.897 | 0.823 | 0.841 | 0.400 | 0.376 |
| DeepLabv3 | 0.866 | 0.779 | 0.749 | 0.303 | 0.353 |
| MAnet | 0.897 | 0.824 | 0.843 | 0.429 | 0.458 |
| DINOv3-small | 0.970 | 0.944 | 0.954 | 0.802 | 0.800 |
Medical Image Segmentation
Medical image segmentation delineates organs, lesions, and other structures in scans to support measurement, diagnosis, treatment planning, and research.
See all 788 papers