Formalizing building-up constructions of self-dual codes through isotropic lines in Lean

We present a machine-checked Lean~4 formalization of Dong and Yang's classification of optimal finite-length $(n,4)$ binary block codes for binary symmetric channels. The formalization was developed mainly by feeding the paper's proofs to an AI tool. To establish correctness, the authors verified the main theorem statements in Lean and the accepted axioms. This note discusses the corrections and simplifications made to the AI-generated formalization, and records discrepancies found in the paper during the formalization. The Lean code is available at https://github.com/shhyang/n4code_lean.

Quantum LDPC code discovery requires searching large algebraic design spaces while reliably certifying the parameters and equivalence classes of any candidates found. We introduce an LLM-guided evolutionary workflow in which language models mutate Python programs that generate bivariate-bicycle and perturbed bivariate-bicycle code ansätze. Across five campaigns, the system performed approximately 1{,}650 evolutionary iterations, screened about $2 \times 10^5$ candidate codes, and required ${\sim}140$ hours of computation and ${\sim}$US$400 in LLM inference cost. Candidate codes are evaluated through a staged validation pipeline combining $\mathrm{GF}(2)$ rank computation, distance estimation and certification, mixed-integer linear programming, BLISS Tanner-graph deduplication, decomposability analysis, and local-Clifford equivalence checks. At block length $n \leq 360$, the workflow identifies 465 distinct candidate codes: 97 CSS bivariate-bicycle codes and 368 non-CSS perturbed variants. The CSS search recovers known high-performing codes and finds new finite-length representatives, including an indecomposable [[288,16,12]] code and higher-weight codes with up to $k = 50$ at distance $d = 8$. The non-CSS search produces perturbed codes matching the gross-code figure of merit at [[144,12,12]], along with additional high-distance candidates reported as certified values or upper bounds according to MILP status. Overall, these results show that LLM-guided program evolution can serve as a practical tool for structured quantum-code discovery when paired with independent evaluation.

The exact Shannon capacity is unknown for every odd cycle beyond the five-cycle $C_5$, making odd cycles a central open problem in zero-error information theory. Improving the known lower bounds requires constructing large independent sets in strong powers of these graphs. Recent AI-assisted work has produced a rapid sequence of improvements: building on the construction of Itty et al., Gao developed a recursive product construction for combining structured independent sets, and Buys, Polak, and Zuiddam (BPZ) subsequently strengthened this through a richer recursion framework. We continue this line of AI-assisted exploration and introduce a heterogeneous refinement of these constructions. The central observation is that the usefulness of an intermediate construction depends not only on the size of its current main independent set, but also on the auxiliary structure it carries into subsequent recursion. Consequently, different parts of that auxiliary structure need not use the same independent set, and different occurrences in a recursion need not use the same intermediate representation. We formalize this for Gao's binary product and derive explicit propagation rules showing how heterogeneous choices strengthen the resulting gadget while leaving its current code size unchanged, then extend the principle to the more general BPZ framework, tailoring constructions to the distinct roles they play within the recursion. Applying these refinements to the seven-cycle $C_7$, we obtain an independent set in $C_7^{\boxtimes 500}$ yielding $Θ(C_7)\ge 3.25883262\ldots$, improving the best known lower bound. Beyond the numerical gain, the results illustrate a general principle for recursive zero-error constructions: intermediate structures with the same dimension and current code size can have different downstream value depending on where and how they are used in the recursion.