Detection of Hate and Threat in Digital Forensics: A Case-Driven Multimodal Approach

Combating hate speech on social media is critical for securing cyberspace, yet relies heavily on the efficacy of automated detection systems. As content formats evolve, hate speech is transitioning from solely plain text to complex multimodal expressions, making implicit attacks harder to spot. Current systems, however, often falter on these subtle cases, as they struggle with multimodal content where the emergent meaning transcends the aggregation of individual modalities. To bridge this gap, we move beyond binary classification to characterize semantic intent shifts where modalities interact to construct implicit hate from benign cues or neutralize toxicity through semantic inversion. Guided by this fine-grained formulation, we curate the Hate via Vision-Language Interplay (H-VLI) benchmark where the true intent hinges on the intricate interplay of modalities rather than overt visual or textual slurs. To effectively decipher these complex cues, we further propose the Asymmetric Reasoning via Courtroom Agent DEbate (ARCADE) framework. By simulating a judicial process where agents actively argue for accusation and defense, ARCADE forces the model to scrutinize deep semantic cues before reaching a verdict. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ARCADE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on H-VLI, particularly for challenging implicit cases, while maintaining competitive performance on established benchmarks. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/Sayur1n/H-VLI

Automated image retrieval plays an increasingly critical role in modern forensic analysis, supporting investigative workflows that rely on efficient comparison of visual evidence. While prior work has focused primarily on developing and optimizing multimodal retrieval systems, limited attention has been paid to evaluating the forensic applicability of these technologies across diverse real-world scenarios. In this study, we present a unified retrieval framework adapted to four key forensic tasks: (1) tattoo image retrieval given a tattoo query image; (2) tattoo retrieval guided by human-expert textual descriptions, modelling the common situation where a witness verbally describes a tattoo; (3) tattoo retrieval from hand-drawn sketches; and (4) face retrieval from forensic face sketches. Our system leverages a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to automatically generate structured textual descriptions for all queries and gallery images, followed by sentence-transformer embedding for text-based comparison. We evaluate retrieval using visual-only embeddings, text-only embeddings and a multimodal fusion strategy that combines text- and image-based similarity scores derived from state-of-the-art visual feature extractors relevant to each task. The fusion of modalities consistently improves retrieval precision and robustness, especially in scenarios where visual information is limited or noisy (e.g., sketches, partial tattoos, or fragmented witness statements). This work highlights the forensic value of a unified multimodal retrieval pipeline and demonstrates how modern MLLMs can operationalize challenging forensic tasks that traditionally rely on manual expert analysis. Our results position multimodal retrieval as a promising tool for supporting investigative workflows involving tattoos, facial composites, and witness descriptions.

Fake news increasingly relies on cross-modal image-text forgeries, making transparent and verifiable reasoning chains an urgent need for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation (DGM4). Existing methods produce black-box detection results without any decision rationale, limiting their reliability in forensic practice. Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer a natural path toward explainability, but applying them to DGM4 raises two difficulties. First, models tend to generate explanations disconnected from predicted evidence locations, producing unverified attribution. Second, enforcing evidence-conclusion consistency requires active optimization, yet uniform training signals fail to distinguish localization tokens from classification tokens, making multi-head joint training unreliable. We propose a multi-modal manipulation detector based on an Evidence-Grounded Forensic Reasoning (EFR) framework. EFR introduces an Anchor-and-Verify reasoning chain that enforces modality-isolated perception before cross-modal comparison, with conclusion coordinates as explicit anchors to which downstream evidence must spatially correspond. A verifiable reward system then enforces evidence-conclusion consistency during training, while a Modality-Decoupled Advantage (MDA) routing mechanism mitigats credit misassignment across prediction tasks. Experiments show that EFR achieves state-of-the-art performance while producing structured forensic reasoning records that explicitly bind explanations to evidence.