Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently achieved notable progress in end-to-end autonomous driving by integrating perception, reasoning, and control within a unified multimodal framework. However, they often lack explicit modeling of temporal dynamics and global world consistency, which limits their foresight and safety. In contrast, world models can simulate plausible future scenes but generally struggle to reason about or evaluate the imagined future they generate. In this work, we present VLA-World, a simple yet effective VLA world model that unifies predictive imagination with reflective reasoning to improve driving foresight. VLA-World first uses an action-derived feasible trajectory to guide the generation of the next-frame image, capturing rich spatial and temporal cues that describe how the surrounding environment evolves. The model then reasons over this self-generated future imagined frame to refine the predicted trajectory, achieving higher performance and better interpretability. To support this pipeline, we curate nuScenes-GR-20K, a generative reasoning dataset derived from nuScenes, and employ a three-stage training strategy that includes pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that VLA-World consistently surpasses state-of-the-art VLA and world-model baselines on both planning and future-generation benchmarks. Project page: https://vlaworld.github.io
Figures & tables
Figure 2: Comparison of the (a) VLA, (b) World Model, and (c) the proposed VLA-World paradigm.
Figure 3: The illustration of the three-stage training and inference pipeline of VLA-World. Our training pipeline consists of three key stages: (a) visual pretrain to activate generation capability, (b) supervised fine-tuning to seed conceptual knowledge to the model, and (c) reinforcement learning with GRPO to explore higher performance like humans.
Method
ST-P3 metrics
UniAD metrics
LLM
L2 (m) ↓
Collision (%) ↓
L2 (m) ↓
Collision (%) ↓
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
Non-Autoregressive methods
ST-P3* [ECCV22] [ 23 ]
1.33
2.11
2.90
2.11
0.23
0.62
1.27
0.71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
VAD [ICCV23] [ 29 ]
0.69
1.22
1.83
1.25
0.06
0.68
2.52
1.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
VAD* [ICCV23] [ 29 ]
0.17
0.34
0.60
0.37
0.04
0.27
0.67
0.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Table 1: End-to-end trajectory planning results on nuScenes [ 10 ] . We evaluate L2 error and collision rate following the respective protocols of ST-P3 [ 23 ] and UniAD [ 25 ] . The ∗ indicates the use of additional ego-state information. Results for VAD [ 29 ] and UniAD [ 25 ] are taken from BEV-Planner [ 38 ] .
Method
DriveGAN
DriveDreamer
Drive-WM
GenAD
GEM
Doe-1
FSDrive
VLA-World
[CVPR21 [ 31 ] ]
[ECCV24 [ 59 ] ]
[CVPR24 [ 61 ] ]
[CVPR24 [ 69 ] ]
[CVPR25 [ 21 ] ]
[arxiv24 [ 80 ] ]
[NeurIPS25 [ 74 ] ]
Type
GAN
Diffusion
Diffusion
Diffusion
Diffusion
Autoregressive
Autoregressive
Autoregressive
Resolution
256 × 256
128 × 192
192 × 384
256 × 448
576 × 1024
384 × 672
128 × 192
128 × 192
FID ↓
73.4
52.6
15.8
15.4
10.5
15.9
10.1
9.8
Table 2: Comparison of future frame generation results with different generative models evaluated by FID ( ↓ ) on the nuScenes [ 10 ] dataset.
Figure 4: Visualization of our VLA-World compared with the SOTA FSDrive [ 74 ] . The top row shows the current scene, and the bottom row shows the generated scene for the next 0.5 seconds. The red trajectory is the model prediction, and the green trajectory is the ground truth. Zoom in for a better view.
Method
Lateral ( F1 )↑
Longitudinal ( F1 )↑
forward
left
right
keep
acc.
dec.
stop
Qwen2-VL-2B
62.43
22.75
28.65
40.70
50.23
49.21
41.04
Qwen2-VL-2B †
92.60
61.78
66.52
56.42
74.32
76.10
74.85
VLA-World
95.88
74.22
75.06
60.98
81.42
80.04
81.24
Table 3: Action prediction performance on the nuScenes dataset measured by F1 score (%). † denotes models trained on nuScenes.
Method
L2 Error (m) ↓
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
(a)
w/o. P.T.
0.35
0.56
0.81
0.57
w/o. SFT
0.35
0.79
1.40
0.85
w/o. RL
0.43
0.70
1.01
0.71
(b)
w/o. Perception
0.42
0.73
1.09
0.75
w/o. Generation
0.41
0.67
0.96
0.68
Table 4: Ablation studies of trajectory planning L2 errors (ST-P3) on nuScenes to validate each proposed component.
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 5: Data sample of (a) pretraining stage, (b) supervised fine-tuning, and (c) reinforcement learning.
Figure 6: Comparison between our VLA-World and the state-of-the-art FSDrive [ 74 ] on generating the future frame at next 0.5 seconds.
Res.
L2 Error (m) ↓
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
36000
0.03
0.14
0.98
0.38
52884
0.11
0.27
0.52
0.30
Appendix
Table 5: Evaluation of trajectory planning L2 errors (ST-P3) on nuScenes with varying input view resolutions.
Figure 7: Comparison of 3-second future trajectory predictions generated by our VLA-World and the state-of-the-art FSDrive [ 74 ] . Zoom in for a better view.
Method
L2 Error (m) ↓
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
Qwen2-VL-2B
0.11
0.27
0.52
0.30
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
0.05
0.08
0.76
0.29
Qwen2-VL-7B
0.03
0.03
0.47
0.18
Appendix
Table 6: Evaluation of trajectory planning L2 errors (ST-P3) on nuScenes with varying model sizes.
Method
L2 Error (m) ↓
1s
2s
3s
Avg.
w/o. Mixed
0.27
0.47
0.73
0.49
Qwen2-VL-2B
0.11
0.27
0.52
0.30
Appendix
Table 7: Evaluation of trajectory planning L2 errors (ST-P3) on nuScenes with training strategy.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and world models have demonstrated strong capabilities in semantic understanding and future scene evolution for autonomous driving. However, effectively integrating both capabilities for trajectory generation remains challenging. In this work, we propose DriveWLA, a unified World-Language-Action model based on Mixture-of-Transformers (MoT) that jointly models semantic understanding, future scene dynamics, and trajectory generation. DriveWLA consists of three experts: a World Expert for future prediction, a Language Expert for semantic understanding, and an Action Expert for trajectory generation. We further introduce Cross-Expert Attention, which enables controlled information flow across experts while aligning semantic and dynamic representations. To improve trajectory generation beyond imitation learning, we apply Flow-GRPO reinforcement learning post-training to refine the Action Expert. Extensive experiments show that DriveWLA achieves superior performance in both open-loop and closed-loop evaluation. DriveWLA achieves 92.3 PDMS on NAVSIM v1 and 90.1 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2, demonstrating strong performance among VLM-based and world-model-based planners. Without specific fine-tuning, DriveWLA further demonstrates strong zero-shot generalization to HUGSIM, nuScenes, and Bench2Drive. These results validate the effectiveness of our unified World-Language-Action modeling, establishing DriveWLA as a generalizable framework for autonomous driving.
Shuzheng Wang, Haoxuan Li, Shengzhen Li +5
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Yinwang Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd.
Autonomous driving requires reasoning about how the environment evolves and planning actions accordingly. Existing world-model-based approaches typically predict future scenes first and plan afterwards, resulting in open-loop imagination that may drift from the actual decision process. In this paper, we present Uni-World VLA, a unified vision-language-action (VLA) model that tightly interleaves future frame prediction and trajectory planning. Instead of generating a full world rollout before planning, our model alternates between predicting future frames and ego actions step by step, allowing planning decisions to be continuously conditioned on the imagined future observations. This interleaved generation forms a closed-loop interaction between world modeling and control, enabling more adaptive decision-making in dynamic traffic scenarios. In addition, we incorporate monocular depth information into frames to provide stronger geometric cues for world modeling, improving long-horizon scene prediction. Experiments on the NAVSIM benchmark show that our approach achieves competitive closed-loop planning performance while producing high-fidelity future frame predictions. These results demonstrate that tightly coupling world prediction and planning is a promising direction for scalable VLA driving systems.
Qiqi Liu, Huan Xu, Jingyu Li +5
Fudan University · Shanghai Innovation Institute · Li Auto Inc. +1
World models have become central to autonomous driving, where accurate scene understanding and future prediction are crucial for safe control. Recent work has explored using vision-language models (VLMs) for planning, yet existing approaches typically treat perception, prediction, and planning as separate modules. We propose UniDrive-WM, a unified VLM-based world model that jointly performs driving-scene understanding, trajectory planning, and trajectory-conditioned future image generation within a single architecture. UniDrive-WM's trajectory planner predicts a future trajectory, which conditions a VLM-based image generator to produce plausible future frames. These predictions provide additional supervisory signals that enhance scene understanding and iteratively refine trajectory generation. We further compare discrete and continuous output representations for future image prediction, analyzing their influence on downstream driving performance. Experiments on the challenging Bench2Drive benchmark show that UniDrive-WM produces high-fidelity future images and improves planning performance by 7.3% in L2 trajectory error and 10.4% in collision rate over the previous best method. These results demonstrate the advantages of tightly integrating VLM-driven reasoning, planning, and generative world modeling for autonomous driving. The project page is available at https://unidrive-wm.github.io/UniDrive-WM.
Zhexiao Xiong, Xin Ye, Burhan Yaman +5
Bosch Research North America · Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence (BCAI) · Arizona State University +2