Prints in the Magnetic Dust: Robust Similarity Search in Legacy Media Images Using Checksum Count Vectors

National-scale magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) repositories increasingly integrate data from different studies and institutions. However, subject identifiers assigned to study participants are typically specific to individual datasets, so the same person may appear under different identifiers when these datasets are aggregated, a problem we define as identity duplication. Such duplication can create leakage between training and test data and inflate apparent performance in downstream biomedical studies. Existing methods do not provide an end-to-end, image-based workflow to address this problem. In this work, we present HAPPEN, a human-in-the-loop pipeline for auditing identity duplication in T1-weighted brain MRI repositories. It combines SHA-256 fingerprinting for exact-duplicate detection with embeddings learned through supervised contrastive learning to retrieve near-duplicate candidates: pairs of non-identical scans that may originate from the same person. Retrieved pairs are reviewed as candidates in a locally hosted interface rather than automatically classified as duplicates. We deployed the workflow in a national-scale aggregated repository containing 95,129 scans and assessed end-to-end recovery of 54 pairs of subject records identified as duplicates using genome-wide genotype data. Transferability was assessed by locally deploying the same workflow on 22,386 scans at an independent institution without model retraining or image transfer. Deployment in the study repository identified 1,316 exact-duplicate scan groups and 1,275 near-duplicate groups of subject records supported by human review. Of these groups, 56% and 82%, respectively, crossed dataset boundaries. All 54 genetic-reference pairs were recovered. The external team independently completed the full workflow using a locally selected operating threshold and review standard.

The personal archive of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (1857-1935) is held as fond 555 of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The archive scanned the fond and published the images, but with no queryable catalogue, no full-text search and no dataset: the holdings can only be browsed one page at a time. This paper describes a machine-readable catalogue of all 2,019 files and 51,008 scans, a dating for 1,969 files taken from the archive's own descriptions, a page-level classification of every scan into handwriting and typescript, and a growing corpus of machine transcriptions (currently 322 files, 5,454 scans). It also reports a way to measure handwritten-text-recognition accuracy in an archive with no ground truth. Archives of the typewriter era often preserve one text twice, as manuscript and as a typed copy; transcribing both and comparing isolates the reading error, since source and pipeline are identical and only page difficulty differs. Across 294 such pairs from 27 files, two readings of a handwritten page agree on a median 37% of words. On two files that also have a published edition the estimate can be checked against ground truth: it is unbiased to within a percentage point and ranks pages as the truth does (rank correlation 0.92 where the edition is a faithful witness). This bounds use: two variants of one work here share 19% of words, below the rate at which two readings of a single page agree, so the redactions cannot be collated word by word at this quality. That negative result is reported as such, and the constraint is built into the tool.

A join is a set of manuscript fragments identified as originally emanating from the same manuscript. We study manuscript join retrieval: Given a query image of a fragment, retrieve other fragments originating from the same physical manuscript. We propose Bag of Bags (BoB), an image-level representation that replaces the global-level visual codebook of classical Bag of Words (BoW) with a fragment-specific vocabulary of local visual words. Our pipeline trains a sparse convolutional autoencoder on binarized fragment patches, encodes connected components from each page, clusters the resulting embeddings with per-image k-means, and compares images using set-to-set distances between their local vocabularies. Evaluated on fragments from the Cairo Genizah, the best BoB variant (viz. Chamfer) achieves Hit@1 of 0.78 and MRR of 0.84, compared to 0.74 and 0.80, respectively, for the strongest BoW baseline (BoW-RawPatches-$χ^2$), a 6.1% relative improvement in top-1 accuracy. We furthermore study a mass-weighted BoB-OT variant that incorporates cluster population into prototype matching and present a formal approximation guarantee bounding its deviation from full component-level optimal transport. A two-stage pipeline using a BoW shortlist followed by BoB-OT reranking provides a practical compromise between retrieval strength and computational cost, supporting applicability to larger manuscript collections. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/TAU-CH/midrash_bob.