Continuous PT-Symmetry Breaking as a Design Variable for Giant Altermagnetic Spin Splitting
Organizations: Department of Physics, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
Abstract
Magnetic point-group analysis classifies altermagnets but returns only a binary symmetry verdict, leaving spin-splitting energy (SSE) inaccessible without spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT). This binary ceiling is not fundamental. Sublattice symmetry breaking is promoted here to a continuous, DFT-free scalar -- the Motif Symmetry-Breaking Index (MSBI) -- that quantifies -symmetry breaking between antiparallel magnetic motifs directly from crystal coordinates. SHAP analysis of an XGBoost surrogate trained on 3,851 DFT-labeled binary structures identifies three dominant descriptors: MSBI (symmetry-breaking axis), motif packing fraction MPF (superexchange axis), and the electron ratio (covalency axis), each mapping onto a directly tunable experimental handle. A controlled VO--CrSb comparison within the same P/mmc host lattice demonstrates that composition alone boosts SSE sevenfold. Bayesian optimization over this three-axis space, followed by independent DFT validation, recovers -NiS (SSE ,eV) as cross-validation against an independent symmetry-based prediction and identifies three previously unrecognized high-SSE candidates -- square-planar FeS (1.297,eV), octahedral CoS (1.103,eV), and FeAs (1.089,eV) -- all matching or exceeding CrSb. Square-planar Fe--S is proposed as a transferable coordination motif for giant altermagnetic spin splitting, advancing altermagnet design from symmetry classification to continuous quantitative optimization.
Figures & tables
| Sc | Ti | V | Cr | Mn | Fe | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn | |
| 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 | |
| Y | Zr | Nb | Mo | Tc | Ru | Rh | Pd | Ag | Cd | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | – | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Feature (Symbol) | Mean (eV) | Ratio | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSBI | 0.1122 | 0.2320 | 0.2320 |
| MPF | 0.0359 | 0.0743 | 0.3063 |
| electron ratio | 0.0328 | 0.0679 | 0.3742 |
| 0.0256 | 0.0529 | 0.4270 | |
| 0.0255 | 0.0526 | 0.4797 | |
| 0.0191 | 0.0395 | 0.5192 |
| Coordination ( ) | Rank | – composition | Prototype | Pred. SSE (eV) | DFT SSE (eV) | Cos. sim. | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | Fe–S a | Square-planar CuO | 1.061 | 1.297 | 0.694 | 9.17 |
| 4 | 3 | Ni–S b | Square-planar CuO | 1.042 | – | 0.555 | 12.93 |
| 4 | 4 | Co–O | Square-planar CuO | 1.033 | 0.972 | 0.634 | 10.95 |
| 4 | 5 | Cr–S | Square-planar CuO | 1.009 | 0.552 | 0.662 | 9.75 |
| 6 | 1 | Ni–S | NiAs | 0.893 | 0.823 | 0.897 | 20.72 |
| 6 | 2 | Co–S | NiAs | 0.874 | 1.103 | 0.905 | 24.35 |
Materials Science
Materials science studies how composition, structure, processing, and defects determine material properties and how to design useful materials.
See all 301 papers