What Do Vision-Language Models Encode for Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment?

Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment (PIAA) aims to predict aesthetic ratings of images that vary across individuals. The aesthetic preferences manifest to different extents across distinct visual stimuli and exhibit cohort-specific patterns. Motivated by the above fact, this paper presents a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)-based approach, which models individual aesthetic preferences by Preference-Rich sample mining and Aesthetically-resonant Cohort merging (PRAC). Specifically, PRAC first identifies preference-rich samples by analyzing both Collective Controversy and Personalized Deviation of images, maximizing the utility of limited user data. Based upon the preference-rich samples, cross-user preference similarities are measured by comparing preference embeddings. Then, a cohort-based model merging strategy, is proposed by aggregating preference patterns from aesthetically-resonant users, which further enhances the personalization for the target individual. Extensive experiments and comparisons on four benchmark PIAA databases demonstrate the superiority of the proposed PRAC model over the state-of-the-arts. The code and model will be public at https://github.com/yzc-ippl/PRAC.

Personalized image aesthetics assessment (PIAA) aims to predict an individual user's subjective rating of an image, which requires modeling user-specific aesthetic preferences. Existing methods rely on historical user ratings for this modeling and therefore struggle when such data are unavailable. We address this zero-shot setting by using user profiles as contextual signals for personalization and adopting a profile-based personalization paradigm. We introduce P-MLLM, a profile-aware multimodal LLM that augments a frozen LLM with selective fusion modules for controlled visual integration. These modules selectively integrate visual information into the model's evolving hidden states during profile-conditioned reasoning, allowing visual information to be incorporated in a profile-aware manner. Experiments on recent PIAA benchmarks show that P-MLLM achieves competitive zero-shot performance and remains effective even with coarse profile information, highlighting the potential of profile-based personalization for zero-shot PIAA.

Psychophysical experiments remain the most reliable approach for perceptual image quality assessment (IQA), yet their cost and limited scalability motivate automated alternatives. This paper investigates whether Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can assist in assessing perceived image appearance and quality. We introduce a psychophysics-inspired framework to probe VLM perceptual sensitivity through controlled pairwise image comparisons of contrast, colorfulness, and overall preference. Six VLMs (four proprietary and two open-weight models) are compared against psychophysical data. Results reveal strong attribute-dependent variability: Claude exhibits the highest internal consistency, whereas GPT achieves the strongest agreement for overall preference. Claude and Qwen show the strongest alignment for colorfulness, while Qwen performs best for contrast. However, no model consistently matches human perception across all attributes. High self-consistency does not necessarily imply perceptual validity, and VLM--human agreement generally improves when perceptual differences among renderings are more pronounced.