cs.CVApr 13, 2026

Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition in Videos for Personalized Digital Health Interventions

Authors: Manuela González-GonzálezSoufiane BelharbiMuhammad Osama ZeeshanMasoumeh SharafiMuhammad Haseeb AslamLorenzo SiaNicolas RichetMarco Pedersoli+3 more

Organizations: Dept. of Health, Kinesiology, & Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada · LIVIA, Dept. of Systems Engineering, ETS Montreal, Canada · LIVIA, Dept. of Software and IT Engineering, ETS Montreal, Canada · Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS Nord-de-l’Ile-de-Montréal, Canada

Abstract

Using behavioural science, health interventions focus on behaviour change by providing a framework to help patients acquire and maintain healthy habits that improve medical outcomes. In-person interventions are costly and difficult to scale, especially in resource-limited regions. Digital health interventions offer a cost-effective approach, potentially supporting independent living and self-management. Automating such interventions, especially through machine learning, has recently gained considerable attention. Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) play a primary role for individuals to delay, avoid, or abandon health interventions. A/H are subtle and conflicting emotions that place a person in a state between positive and negative evaluations of a behaviour, or between acceptance and refusal to engage in it. They manifest as affective inconsistency across modalities or within a modality, such as language, facial, vocal expressions, and body language. While experts can be trained to recognize A/H, integrating them into digital health interventions is costly and less effective. Automatic A/H recognition is therefore critical for the personalization and cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions. Here, we explore the application of deep learning models for A/H recognition in videos, a multi-modal task by nature. In particular, this paper covers three learning setups: supervised learning, unsupervised domain adaptation for personalization, and zero-shot inference via large language models (LLMs). Our experiments are conducted on the unique and recently published BAH video dataset for A/H recognition. Our results show limited performance, suggesting that more adapted multi-modal models are required for accurate A/H recognition. Better methods for modeling spatio-temporal and multimodal fusion are necessary to leverage conflicts within/across modalities.

Explore similar work

Jul 13, 2026cs.CV

A Calibrated Multimodal Ensemble for Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition: System Description and Private-Test Submission Strategy

Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) undermine digital behaviour-change interventions, and recognizing them automatically from video is the goal of the ABAW A/H challenge on the BAH dataset. We describe our system for the 11th edition of the challenge: a calibrated, equal-weight ensemble of three fusion models over frozen face, audio, text, and pose embeddings, which reaches 0.7358 macro-F1 on the public test set. This year's private test, released on a disjoint set of 30 new participants, is scored on five allowed submissions; we report the configuration and rationale of each of our five submissions, and, where already available, the private-test score obtained. Our first submission, an exact replica of the calibrated ensemble tuned only on public validation, scored 0.7361 macro-F1 on the private test, matching our public-test estimate almost exactly and confirming the pipeline generalizes to unseen participants without leakage.
Josep Cabacas-Maso, Ismael Benito-Altamirano, Carles Ventura
Jul 28, 2026cs.CV

Knowledge-Guided Multimodal Reasoning over Interacting Streams for Video-Level Ambivalence and Hesitancy Recognition

Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) are conflicting affective states that precede the delay or abandonment of health behaviour change. Recognition of A/H at the video level is difficult, since the signal arises from disagreement across and within facial, vocal, linguistic, and bodily modalities, and manifests differently across individuals. The proposed PRISM-AH (Predictive Reasoning over Interacting Streams for Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition), is a framework that treats A/H as a multimodal conflict that unfolds over time. Frozen vision, audio, and text encoders are aligned into short time windows and passed to a lightweight streaming model that scores cross-modal dissonance, predicts each next window to expose a hesitation surprise signal, discovers behaviour prototypes, and is conditioned on participant metadata. Dense window-level annotations supervise the model as an auxiliary objective, and the decision threshold is calibrated for macro F1. A knowledge-guided large language model then reasons over structured evidence using the expert cue taxonomy of the dataset, and its verdict is fused late only when validation performance improves. On the labelled public test partition of 525 videos, PRISM-AH attains a macro F1 of 0.6133, compared to the reported zero-shot baseline of 0.2827. The reasoning gain is validated to transfer from validation to the larger test partition.
Podakanti Satyajith Chary, Barath Parthiban, Pranesh Velmurugan +2
Jul 13, 2026cs.CV

Simple Features and Honest Calibration for Ambivalence and Hesitancy Recognition in Video

We address ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) recognition in the ABAW 2026 BAH Challenge: given a short interview video, predict whether the person shows signs of A/H. Our system combines affect-specialised text, audio, and visual representations with a small set of readable linguistic hesitation cues, fused by a reliability gate we call Affective Marker Fusion (AMF), and finished with a simple AP-weighted ensemble at a fixed decision threshold. We also introduce \emph{ASR-erased time}: speech recognisers delete fillers and hesitation pauses from the transcript, but the chunk timestamps keep the time those events took, and sixteen features built from these gaps form the strongest and most independent non-verbal channel we measured (AP 0.7180.718, correlation 0.110.11--0.360.36 with all other members). Across controlled experiments we find three things: cross-modal conflict design does not reliably help on BAH; language is by far the strongest channel while affect-specialised audio is a useful second; and calibration matters more than architecture. Fitting ensemble weights and a threshold on the small validation split overfits: it scores 0.7410.741 macro-F1 on validation but only 0.6900.690 on the untouched test set. AP-weighting at a fixed threshold instead reaches 0.731\mathbf{0.731} on test.
Vikas Kumar, Aditya Mishra, Haroon R. Lone