TimeMark: A Trustworthy Time Watermarking Framework for Exact Generation-Time Recovery from AIGC
Organizations: Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China · School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China · School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China
Abstract
The widespread use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in text generation has raised increasing concerns about intellectual property disputes. Watermarking techniques, which embed meta information into AI-generated content (AIGC), have the potential to serve as judicial evidence. However, existing methods rely on statistical signals in token distributions, leading to inherently probabilistic detection and reduced reliability, especially in multi-bit encoding (e.g., timestamps). Moreover, such methods introduce detectable statistical patterns, making them vulnerable to forgery attacks and enabling model providers to fabricate arbitrary watermarks. To address these issues, we propose the concept of trustworthy watermark, which achieves reliable recovery with 100% identification accuracy while resisting both user-side statistical attacks and provider-side forgery. We focus on trustworthy time watermarking for use as judicial evidence. Our framework integrates cryptographic techniques and encodes time information into time-dependent secret keys under regulatory supervision, preventing arbitrary timestamp fabrication. The watermark payload is decoupled from time and generated as a random, non-stored bit sequence for each instance, eliminating statistical patterns. To ensure verifiability, we design a two-stage encoding mechanism, which, combined with error-correcting codes, enables reliable recovery of generation time with theoretically perfect accuracy. Both theoretical analysis and experiments demonstrate that our framework satisfies the reliability requirements for judicial evidence and offers a practical solution for future AIGC-related intellectual property disputes.
Figures & tables
| Legal requirement | Practical requirement | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Sufficient authenticity | High evidentiary trustworthiness | The claimed generation time should accurately correspond to the specific record offered as evidence, so that the record is what the proponent claims it to be. |
| Reliable process or system capable of producing accurate results | Process reliability | Each AIGC output should be reliably bound to its timestamp through a trustworthy generation procedure, and the service provider itself should not be able to forge this association arbitrarily. |
| Preservation of data integrity | Tamper resistance | Tampered, manipulated, or forged texts should not produce a valid timestamp under the verification procedure. |
| Verifiability by the court or other parties | Verifiability | Timestamp validation should rely on inspectable evidence and a public verification procedure, rather than on unilateral assertions by a particular service provider. |
| Arising from a regularly conducted business activity | Routine operational generation | The evidence should be generated natively as part of the platform’s ordinary operational workflow, rather than being created retrospectively for litigation. |
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Number of watermarked texts with correctly identified generation time | 800 ( ) |
| Number of non-watermarked texts identified as having a generation time | 0 ( ) |
| Average verification score in Step 2 for watermarked texts | 0.7699 |
| Average verification score in Step 2 for non-watermarked texts | 0.4993 |
Text Watermarking
Text watermarking embeds detectable signals in generated text to indicate provenance, identify sources, or carry messages.
See all 44 papers