Mining Large Language Models for Low-Resource Language Data: Comparing Elicitation Strategies for Hausa and Fongbe

We investigate the translation quality of current large language models (LLMs) for English-to-Hausa and English-to-Fongbe - two typologically distinct West African languages from the Afroasiatic and Niger-Congo families respectively - and evaluate whether standard automatic metrics reliably reflect human judgment for these low-resource languages. We evaluate four models (GPT-4o Mini, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Qwen2.5-7B) at progressive scales (500 to 10,000 sentences) using automatic metrics (BLEU, chrF++, TER, COMET, BERTScore) validated against native-speaker judgment. Our results reveal three key findings. First, translation quality varies substantially by language: Hausa achieves acceptable quality (human scores 4.0-4.5/5) while Fongbe achieves poor quality (1.0-2.2/5), with a consistent 3x BLEU gap across all systems. Second, model rankings differ by language - Gemini leads for Fongbe while GPT-4o leads for Hausa by human evaluation - indicating that performance on one low-resource African language does not predict performance on another. Third, metric-human correlation varies dramatically: perfect rank correlation for Fongbe (rho=1.0) but weak correlation for Hausa (rho=0.5), where human evaluators preferred GPT-4o despite all automatic metrics ranking Claude first. We further show that neural metrics like BERTScore exhibit embedding collapse (within-language similarity >0.99) for both languages, limiting their ability to differentiate translation quality. Based on these findings, we recommend multi-metric evaluation for low-resource African languages, with particular caution when interpreting neural metrics. We establish that minimum sample sizes of n=2,500 sentences are required for stable system rankings, as smaller samples produced artifact findings that reversed at scale.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated in multilingual settings, yet their inference behavior in low-resource African languages remains underexplored especially under pure prompting without fine-tuning. We present a systematic study of prompting strategies for Natural Language Inference (NLI) in Swahili, Yoruba, and Hausa using the AfriXNLI benchmark. We evaluate five prompting strategies Baseline (zero-shot), Script-Aware, Language Specific, Contrastive, and Native-Label Self-Translation (NL-STP) across two mid-sized open weight models (Llama3.2-3B and Gemma3-4B). To isolate the effect of prompt design, the effect of few-shot examples and Chain-of-Thought reasoning is eliminated in our study. We find a significant difference in performance of class wise across strategies with highly neutral class collapse and high prediction skew in some configurations. Contrastive prompting proves to be the most reliable and steadily improving strategy over language and model and has better balance of class behavior and balance of overall accuracy gains. Notably, well-constructed prompts are sufficient to beat more powerful baselines that are provided with few-shot prompts and Chain-of-Thought prompts. We have found that prompt formulation is essential to multilingual NLI with low-resource languages and that language aware decision structuring can be used to meaningfully enhance robustness in resource challenged settings.

Low-resource African languages lack text corpora needed for language model training. We investigate whether ASR pipelines can extend text resources for two typologically distinct West African languages: Fongbe (tonal, diacritic-rich) and Hausa (non-tonal). We fine-tune MMS-300M on a curated 12.3-hour Fongbe dataset, achieving 9.48% WER on the ALFFA benchmark - a 78% relative reduction from the prior 44.04% baseline - while preserving tonal diacritics critical to the language. For Hausa, we apply an existing fine-tuned Whisper-Small model. We catalog 1,553 YouTube videos (236 hours) and process a subset of 424 videos (45.49 hours) selected to balance domain diversity with available computational resources, producing 6,770 transcribed segments. Human evaluation on 50 randomly sampled segments per language shows mean quality scores of 57.4/100 for Hausa and 36.5/100 for Fongbe, indicating that while Hausa transcriptions approach acceptable quality for corpus construction, Fongbe transcriptions require post-processing or improved models for production use. We release the curated dataset, fine-tuned model, transcribed corpus, and full video catalog following platform terms and ethical guidelines.