Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation for PET-Free Amyloid-Beta Detection from MRI
Organizations: Dublin City University, Ireland · Insight Research Ireland Centre for Data Analytics, Ireland · St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Ireland · University College Dublin, Ireland
Abstract
Detecting amyloid- (A) positivity is crucial for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease but typically requires PET imaging, which is costly, invasive, and not widely accessible, limiting its use for population-level screening. We address this gap by proposing a PET-guided knowledge distillation framework that enables A prediction from MRI alone, without requiring non-imaging clinical covariates or PET at inference. Our approach employs a BiomedCLIP-based teacher model that learns PET-MRI alignment via cross-modal attention and triplet contrastive learning with PET-informed (Centiloid-aware) online negative sampling. An MRI-only student then mimics the teacher via feature-level and logit-level distillation. Evaluated across four MRI contrasts (T1w, T2w, FLAIR, T2*) and two independent datasets, our approach demonstrates effective knowledge transfer (best AUC: 0.74 on OASIS-3, 0.68 on ADNI) while maintaining interpretability and eliminating the need for clinical variables. Saliency analysis confirms that predictions focus on anatomically relevant cortical regions, supporting the clinical viability of PET-free A screening. Code is available at https://github.com/FrancescoChiumento/pet-guided-mri-amyloid-detection.
Figures & tables
| Cohort (MRI) | Sessions | Subjects | %Pos (Train) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Train | Val | Test | Train | Val | Test | ||
| OASIS-3 (T1w T2w) | 518 | 187 | 166 | 346 | 118 | 127 | 21.8 |
| OASIS-3 (FLAIR T2*) | 288 | 96 | 89 | 287 | 93 | 88 | 34.4 |
| ADNI (T1w T2w) | 303 | 102 | 90 | 212 | 72 | 68 | 44.9 |
| ADNI (FLAIR T2*) | 608 | 193 | 190 | 405 | 132 | 132 | 50.2 |
| OASIS-3 | ADNI | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Modality | Sel. | @0.5 | @ | AUC | NPV | Sel. | @0.5 | @ | AUC | NPV | ||||||||||||
| F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | |||||||
| T1w & T2w available | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| T1w | F1 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.81 | F1 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.77 |
| T1w | Sim | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 0.83 | Sim | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.82 | 0.64 | 0.68 |
| T2w | F1 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.80 | F1 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| Method | MRI Input | Ground Truth | Clin. | Training | N | AUC [95% CI] |
| Kim et al. (2025) [ 23 ] (T1w) | T1w | PET (CL) | No | Direct | 779 | 0.61 [0.59–0.63] |
| Kim et al. (2025) [ 23 ] (T1w+FLAIR) | T1w+FLAIR | PET (CL) | No | Direct | 779 | 0.67 [0.65–0.70] |
| Wang et al. (2025) [ 56 ] | T1w | PET (SUVR 1.11) | Yes † | Transfer | 241 | 0.74 |
| Dolci et al. (2025) [ 12 ] | 3-modal | CSF (A 42) ‡ | No | Direct | – | – |
| Chiumento et al. (2025) [ 10 ] | T1w | PET (CL) | No | Direct | – | – |
| Ours T1w | T1w | PET (CL) | No | KD+Trip | 166 | 0.73 [0.66–0.82] |
| @0.5 | @ | Overall | ||||||||
| Modality | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | AUC | NPV |
| ADNI (Teacher) KD OASIS-3 (Student) — Sel.=F1 | ||||||||||
| T1w | 0.27 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.18 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.80 |
| T2w | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| T1w+T2w T1w | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| T1w+T2w T2w | 0.39 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.82 |
| @0.5 | @ | Overall | |||||||||
| Dataset | Modality | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | AUC | NPV |
| No Pre-training (Phase 1) | |||||||||||
| OASIS-3 | T1w | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| OASIS-3 | T2w | 0.16 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.80 |
| ADNI | T1w | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.70 |
| ADNI | T2w | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.63 |
Appendix figures & tables7 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Abbr. | Full Form | Abbr. | Full Form |
| Medical & Imaging | |||
| A | Amyloid- | OASIS-3 | Open Access Series of Imaging Studies 3 [ 27 ] |
| AD | Alzheimer’s disease | PET | Positron Emission Tomography |
| ADNI | Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ 1 ] | PiB | Pittsburgh Compound B [ 58 ] |
| CL | Centiloid | PUP | PET Unified Pipeline [ 49 ] |
| CSF | Cerebrospinal Fluid | SUVR | Standardized Uptake Value Ratio |
| Phases 1–2 (Teacher) | Phase 3 (Student) | |
|---|---|---|
| Projection head | ||
| Classification head |
| OASIS-3 | ADNI | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sequence | @0.5 | @ | AUC | NPV | @0.5 | @ | AUC | NPV | ||||||||||||||
| F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 | Acc | Prec | Rec | |||||||
| T1-weighted MRI | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| T1w | 0.0 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.0 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| T1w | 5.0 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 5.0 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 0.77 |
| T1w | 10.0 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 10.0 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.68 |