Representation geometry shapes task performance in vision-language modeling for CT enterography
Authors: Cristian Minoccheri, Emily Wittrup, Kayvan Najarian, Ryan Stidham
Organizations: Gilbert S. Omenn Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, 48104, MI, USA. · Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, 48104, MI, USA. · Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, 48104, MI, USA. · Department of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, 48104, MI, USA.
Computed tomography (CT) enterography is a primary imaging modality for assessing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet the representational choices that best support automated analysis of this modality are unknown. We present the first study of vision-language transfer learning on abdominal CT enterography and identify two main findings. First, mean pooling of slice embeddings gives better categorical disease assessment (59.2% three-class accuracy), whereas attention pooling gives better cross-modal retrieval (0.235 text-to-image MRR). This pattern holds across all LoRA configurations tested and suggests that the two aggregators emphasize different properties of the learned representation. Second, per-slice tissue contrast matters more than broader spatial coverage: multi-window RGB encoding, which maps complementary Hounsfield Unit windows to RGB channels, outperforms all strategies that increase spatial coverage through multiplanar sampling, and in this setting adding coronal and sagittal views reduces classification performance. For report generation, fine-tuning without retrieval context yields within-1 severity accuracy at the prevalence-matched chance level (70.4% vs.\ 71% random), suggesting little learned ordering beyond the class distribution. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves this across all configurations, scoring 7--14 percentage points above the chance baseline and improving ordinal MAE from 0.98 to 0.80--0.89. A three-teacher pseudolabel framework enables all comparisons without expert annotations. Together, these findings provide the first baselines for this underexplored modality and offer practical guidance for building vision-language systems for volumetric medical imaging.
Figures & tables
Configuration
Accuracy
Macro-F1
Multiwindow RGB
0.568
0.555
Axial baseline
0.538
0.523
Adjacent RGB
0.514
0.505
Axial + stratified sampling
0.506
0.489
Multiaxial
0.490
0.470
Multiaxial + stratified sampling
0.490
0.472
Table 1: Input-encoding and sampling ablations using mean pooling aggregation and v4b6_t4b6 LoRA configuration. Adjacent RGB maps consecutive slices to RGB; Multiwindow RGB maps HU windows to RGB; Axial uses single plane; Multiaxial uses axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. Random baseline: 33% accuracy, 0.33 macro-F1.
Configuration
Accuracy
Macro-F1
F1 (Normal)
F1 (Poss.)
F1 (Abn.)
Mean, v8b12_t8b6
0.592
0.580
0.541
0.545
0.655
Mean, v4b6_t4b6
0.568
0.555
0.514
0.515
0.636
Mean, v8b6_t4b6
0.536
0.523
0.480
0.478
0.611
Attn, v8b12_t8b6
0.552
0.541
0.521
0.486
0.617
Attn, v4b6_t4b6
0.560
0.550
0.526
0.508
0.617
Attn, v8b6_t4b6
0.536
0.519
0.480
0.448
0.630
Table 2: Three-class disease activity classification on the test set ( n=125 ). All models use multiwindow RGB encoding with multiplanar sampling. Aggregator: Mean = mean pooling, Attn = attention pooling, Lite = lightweight transformer. LoRA: vXbY_tZbW = vision rank X over Y blocks, text rank Z over W blocks. Random baseline: 33% accuracy, 0.33 macro-F1.
Image-to-Text (I2T)
Text-to-Image (T2I)
Configuration
R@1
R@5
R@10
MRR
R@1
R@5
R@10
MRR
Mean, v8b6_t4b6
0.088
0.136
0.232
0.140
0.160
0.264
0.400
0.231
Mean, v8b12_t8b6
0.064
0.176
0.256
0.132
0.064
0.296
0.392
0.166
Mean, v4b6_t4b6
0.064
0.168
0.240
0.135
0.152
0.304
0.360
0.228
Attn, v4b6_t4b6
0.088
0.160
0.248
0.146
0.160
0.304
0.400
0.235
Attn, v8b6_t4b6
0.088
0.168
0.216
0.142
0.064
0.280
0.392
0.169
Table 3: Cross-modal retrieval performance on the test set ( n=125 ). All models use multiwindow RGB encoding with multiplanar sampling. Aggregator: Mean = mean pooling, Attn = attention pooling, Lite = lightweight transformer. LoRA: vXbY_tZbW = vision rank X over Y blocks, text rank Z over W blocks. I2T = image-to-text, T2I = text-to-image. Random baseline: R@1=0.008, R@5=0.04, R@10=0.08.
Model
ROUGE-L
METEOR
BLEU
BERTScore
MedGemma (SFT)
0.126
0.173
6.28
0.826
RAG with CT-CLIP retrieval ( k=5 ):
Mean, v4b3_t4b3
0.121
0.216
1.46
0.828
Mean, v4b6_t4b6
0.122
0.214
1.45
0.830
Attn, v4b3_t4b3
0.119
0.215
1.43
0.828
Attn, v4b6_t4b6
0.124
0.218
1.42
0.828
Table 4: Report generation evaluation on the test set ( n=125 ). RAG models use lighter LoRA configurations than classification models, as generation quality depends primarily on retrieval context. Aggregator: Mean = mean pooling, Attn = attention pooling, Lite = lightweight transformer. LoRA: vXbY_tZbW = vision rank X over Y blocks, text rank Z over W blocks. BLEU is sentence-level SacreBLEU (0–100 scale).
Model
Accuracy
Macro-F1
Ord. MAE
Within-1
Mean, v4b3_t4b3
0.360
0.340
0.82
0.816
Mean, v4b6_t4b6
0.336
0.337
0.86
0.808
Attn, v4b3_t4b3
0.376
0.361
0.80
0.824
Attn, v4b6_t4b6
0.336
0.325
0.82
0.848
Lite, v4b6_t4b6
0.360
0.351
0.80
0.840
Lite, v4b3_t4b3
0.328
0.306
0.89
0.784
Table 5: Label consistency evaluation: accuracy of disease activity labels extracted from generated impressions compared to ground-truth consensus labels. Models match those in Table 4 . Ordinal metrics treat labels as ordered (normal < possibly abnormal < abnormal). Random baselines: 33% exact accuracy; 71% within-1 (prevalence-matched), 74% within-1 (uniform).
Recent 3D CT vision-language models align volumes with reports via contrastive pretraining, but typically rely on limited public data and provide only coarse global supervision. We train a 3D CT vision-language model on 98k report-volume pairs (50k patients) collected at a single hospital, combined with public datasets, using SigLIP-style contrastive pretraining together with prompt-based disease supervision in the shared vision-text embedding space. On CT-RATE, our model achieves state-of-the-art text-to-image retrieval (R@10 31.5 vs. 22.2) and competitive disease classification (AUC 83.8 vs. 83.8), with consistent results on Rad-ChestCT (AUC 77.0 vs. 77.3). We further observe that radiologists routinely reference specific images within their reports (e.g., ``series X, image Y''), linking textual descriptions to precise axial locations. We automatically mine 262k such snippet-slice pairs and introduce the task of intra-scan snippet localization -- predicting the axial depth referred to by a text snippet -- reducing mean absolute error to 36.3 mm at 12 mm feature resolution, compared with 67.0 mm for the best baseline. Adding this localization objective leaves retrieval and classification broadly unchanged within confidence bounds, yielding a single unified model for retrieval, classification, and intra-scan grounding.
Simon Ging, Philipp Arnold, Sebastian Walter +6
Computer Vision Group, University of Freiburg, Germany · Adaptive & Agentic AI · Adaptive & Agentic AI (A3) Lab, Aarhus University, Denmark +5
Computed Tomography (CT) is one of the most widely used and diagnostically information-dense imaging modalities, covering critical organs such as the heart, lungs, liver, and colon. Clinical interpretation relies on both slice-driven local features (e.g., sub-centimeter nodules, lesion boundaries) and volume-driven spatial representations (e.g., tumor infiltration, inter-organ anatomical relations). However, existing Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) remain fragmented in CT slice versus volumetric understanding: slice-driven LVLMs show strong generalization but lack cross-slice spatial consistency, while volume-driven LVLMs explicitly capture volumetric semantics but suffer from coarse granularity and poor compatibility with slice inputs. The absence of a unified modeling paradigm constitutes a major bottleneck for the clinical translation of medical LVLMs. We present OmniCT, a powerful unified slice-volume LVLM for CT scenarios, which makes three contributions: (i) Spatial Consistency Enhancement (SCE): volumetric slice composition combined with tri-axial positional embedding that introduces volumetric consistency, and an MoE hybrid projection enables efficient slice-volume adaptation; (ii) Organ-level Semantic Enhancement (OSE): segmentation and ROI localization explicitly align anatomical regions, emphasizing lesion- and organ-level semantics; (iii) MedEval-CT: the largest slice-volume CT dataset and hybrid benchmark integrates comprehensive metrics for unified evaluation. OmniCT consistently outperforms existing methods with a substantial margin across diverse clinical tasks and satisfies both micro-level detail sensitivity and macro-level spatial reasoning. More importantly, it establishes a new paradigm for cross-modal medical imaging understanding. Our project is available at https://github.com/ZJU4HealthCare/OmniCT.
Tianwei Lin, Zhongwei Qiu, Wenqiao Zhang +12
Zhejiang University · DAMO Academy, Alibaba Group · Hupan Lab
Learning transferable representations from CT-report pairs requires combining whole-volume context with anatomy-specific evidence. Existing methods typically emphasize either global CT-report alignment or fine-grained anatomy-level correspondence. Global alignment preserves broad study context but leaves the contribution of localized evidence implicit, whereas anatomy-level alignment explicitly grounds local findings but does not specify how independently represented evidence should interact, acquire study-level meaning, and contribute to a global CT representation. To address this gap, we propose SCOPE (Semantic Calibration Of comPosed Evidence), a framework for semantically calibrated evidence composition in CT vision-language learning. Under organ-specific report supervision, mask-guided queries with fixed anatomical identities extract context-aware organ evidence from shared, uncropped volumetric features, while an unrestricted global query retains access to whole-volume context. The global query then drives Local-Global Coupling to compose the organ evidence into a unified evidence representation. The composed evidence is subsequently calibrated using the diagnostic summary, providing study-level semantic supervision beyond local organ descriptions, and is finally integrated as a controlled residual into a context-preserving whole-volume representation aligned with the complete report. This progressive pathway connects localized evidence with study-level semantics without reducing the CT representation to a predefined set of organs. On CT-RATE and RadChestCT, SCOPE achieves macro AUCs of 85.0 and 72.2, respectively, outperforming the previous SOTA by 7.2 and 4.2, while also yielding substantial gains in linear probing and cross-modal retrieval. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of semantically calibrated evidence composition.
Guoliang You, Haifan Gong, Xiaomeng Chu
University of Pennsylvania · 2The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · 3Yale University