cs.CRApr 14, 2026

Honeypot Protocol

Authors: Najmul Hasan

Organizations: University of North Carolina at Pembroke · With Apart Research

Abstract

Trusted monitoring, the standard defense in AI control, is vulnerable to adaptive attacks, collusion, and strategic attack selection. All of these exploit the fact that monitoring is passive: it observes model behavior but never probes whether the model would behave differently under different perceived conditions. We introduce the honeypot protocol, which tests for context-dependent behavior by varying only the system prompt across three conditions (evaluation, synthetic deployment, explicit no-monitoring) while holding the task, environment, and scoring identical. We evaluate Claude Opus 4.6 in BashArena across all three conditions in both honest and attack modes. The model achieved 100% main task success and triggered zero side tasks uniformly across conditions, providing a baseline for future comparisons with stronger attack policies and additional models.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. TraceGuard: Structured Multi-Dimensional Monitoring as a Collusion-Resistant Control Protocol

    Apr 5, 2026Khanh Linh Nguyen, Hoa Nghiem, Tu TranAI Agent MonitoringAI Control

  2. Towards Agentic Honeynet Configuration

    Mar 14, 2026Federico Mirra, Matteo Boffa, Idilio Drago +2Autonomous Cyber DefenseAgentic AI