cs.LGApr 15, 2026

Minimax Optimality and Spectral Routing for Majority-Vote Ensembles under Markov Dependence

Authors: Ibne Farabi Shihab, Sanjeda Akter, Anuj Sharma

Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University · Department of Civil, Construction & Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University

Abstract

Majority-vote ensembles achieve variance reduction by averaging over diverse, approximately independent base learners. When training data exhibits Markov dependence, as in time-series forecasting, reinforcement learning (RL) replay buffers, and spatial grids, this classical guarantee degrades in ways that existing theory does not fully quantify. We provide a minimax characterization of this phenomenon for discrete classification in a fixed-dimensional Markov setting, together with an adaptive algorithm that matches the rate on a graph-regular subclass. We first establish an information-theoretic lower bound for stationary, reversible, geometrically ergodic chains in fixed ambient dimension, showing that no measurable estimator can achieve excess classification risk better than Ω(\Tmix/n)Ω(\sqrt{\Tmix/n}). We then prove that, on the AR(1) witness subclass underlying the lower-bound construction, dependence-agnostic uniform bagging is provably suboptimal with excess risk bounded below by Ω(\Tmix/n)Ω(\Tmix/\sqrt{n}), exhibiting a \Tmix\sqrt{\Tmix} algorithmic gap. Finally, we propose adaptive spectral routing, which partitions the training data via the empirical Fiedler eigenvector of a dependency graph and achieves the minimax rate O(\Tmix/n)\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\Tmix/n}) up to a lower-order geometric cut term on a graph-regular subclass, without knowledge of \Tmix\Tmix. Experiments on synthetic Markov chains, 2D spatial grids, the 128-dataset UCR archive, and Atari DQN ensembles validate the theoretical predictions. Consequences for deep RL target variance, scalability via Nyström approximation, and bounded non-stationarity are developed as supporting material in the appendix.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables5 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

May 12, 2026

Minimax Rates and Spectral Distillation for Tree Ensembles

Tree ensembles such as random forests (RFs) and gradient boosting machines (GBMs) are among the most widely used supervised learners, yet their theoretical properties remain incompletely understood. We adopt a spectral perspective on these algorithms, with two main contributions. First, we derive minimax-optimal convergence for RF regression, showing that, under mild regularity conditions on tree growth, the eigenvalue decay of the induced kernel operator governs the statistical rate. Second, we exploit this spectral viewpoint to develop compression schemes for tree ensembles. For RFs, leading eigenfunctions of the kernel operator capture the dominant predictive directions; for GBMs, leading singular vectors of the smoother matrix play an analogous role. Learning nonlinear maps for these spectral representations yields distilled models that are orders of magnitude smaller than the originals while maintaining competitive predictive performance. Our methods compare favorably to state of the art algorithms for forest pruning and rule extraction, with applications to resource constrained computing.
Oct 14, 2026

Minimax estimation of the pseudo-spectral gap of continuous Markov chains, with applications to empirical concentration bounds

We study the minimax estimation of the pseudo-spectral gap γpsγ_{ps} of a Markov chain from the observation of a single trajectory. Extending earlier works on finite-state space chains by Wolfer and Kontorovich (2024), we provide an estimator in the case of a compact, continuous state-space. Our estimator appears to be minimax-optimal on the class of chains with a transition operator with Lipschitz density, up to logarithmic terms. Our estimator, combined with Paulin's version of Bernstein inequality, allows to derive empirical concentration inequalities for Markov chains. This unlocks many applications, from confidence intervals, to active learning and generalization bounds. In particular, for rested bandits with Markov rewards, we provide a version of UCB with a regret bound similar to the one in the iid case, without assuming any knowledge on the pseudo-spectral gap of the chains.
Oct 16, 2026

Margin Certificates for Voting Classifiers under Mixing Dependence

Margin bounds explain why weighted votes generalize after training error vanishes, but dependent observations require concentration arguments that keep the dependence model and failure budget explicit. We study stationary mixing streams without treating dependence as a formal substitution of an "effective sample size." For a finite base class, we combine independent-block Rademacher theory for stationary ββ-mixing processes with a clipped margin loss to obtain an explicit uniform voting-margin certificate, whose dependence penalty is set by the number of approximately independent blocks and the coupling budget 4(μ−1)β(a)4(μ-1)β(a). A black-box transfer theorem shows that any i.i.d. voting-margin guarantee remains valid on a regularly spaced subsequence, with only an additive ββ-mixing failure probability. For votes fixed independently of a stationary finite-state reversible Markov stream, spectral concentration gives the cleaner trel/n\sqrt{t_{rel}/n} rate, and a sticky-refresh construction shows this exponent is unavoidable. The constant is statistic-specific: the effective sample size is n/τint(g)n/τ_{int}(g), with τint(g)≤2trel−1τ_{int}(g) \le 2t_{rel}-1. When the dependence scale is unknown, a batch-means Student-t interval is valid up to an explicit remainder vanishing in the number of batches, with width governed by τint(g)τ_{int}(g) rather than the worst-case trelt_{rel}. Experiments show: the learned-vote certificate is nonvacuous once the block count is large; a two-timescale construction gives a batch-means interval 8.1x narrower than the worst-case interval at nominal coverage (0.945); block-bootstrap and batch-means intervals undercover under strong dependence while the certificate stays valid; and on real, ordered UCI HAR sensor data the dependence-agnostic certificate reaches 0.95 coverage where naive intervals reach only 0.38.