Optimization with SpotOptim

Hyperparameter optimization is crucial to achieving high performance in deep learning. On top of the performance, other criteria such as inference time or memory requirement often need to be optimized due to some practical reasons. This motivates research on multi-objective optimization (MOO). However, Pareto fronts of MOO methods are often shown without considering the variability caused by random seeds and this makes the performance stability evaluation difficult. Although there is a concept named empirical attainment surface to enable the visualization with uncertainty over multiple runs, there is no major Python package for empirical attainment surface. We, therefore, develop a Python package for this purpose and describe the usage. The package is available at https://github.com/nabenabe0928/empirical-attainment-func. OptunaHub now provides our implementation at https://hub.optuna.org/visualization/plot_empirical_attainment_surface/.

We present mlr3mbo, a modular toolbox for Bayesian optimization in R. mlr3mbo supports single- and multi-objective optimization, multi-point proposals, batch and asynchronous parallelization, and robust error handling. While it can be used for many standard Bayesian optimization variants in applied settings, researchers can also construct custom Bayesian optimization algorithms from its flexible building blocks. In addition to an introduction to the software, its design principles, and its building blocks, the paper presents two extensive empirical evaluations on the surrogate-based benchmark suite YAHPO Gym. To identify robust default configurations for both numeric and mixed-hierarchical optimization regimes, and to gain further insights into the respective impacts of individual settings, we run a coordinate descent search over the mlr3mbo configuration space and analyze its results. Furthermore, we benchmark mlr3mbo against a wide range of established optimizers, including HEBO, SMAC3, Ax, and Optuna, and find that it performs on par with state-of-the-art.

Bayesian Optimization (BO) is widely adopted for data-efficient optimization in scientific and engineering applications, yet its computational cost is rarely evaluated alongside optimization performance. Here we present a systematic, compute-aware study of BO that evaluates surrogate models along two axes: optimization quality and computational frugality. Across eight benchmark functions and nine real-world datasets spanning materials science, mechanics, robotics, chemistry, and machine learning, we benchmark four surrogate models: Gaussian Processes, Random Forests, NGBoost, and Bayesian Adaptive Spline Surfaces. We show that Gaussian Process-based BO consistently incurs the highest time and memory overhead without delivering superior optimization or sample efficiency. In contrast, scalable alternatives achieve equal or better performance at a fraction of the computational cost. Motivated by these findings, we introduce a surrogate-recommendation framework that predicts the most suitable BO surrogate from inexpensive dataset characteristics. Together, these results establish FruBO as a reproducible, compute-aware baseline for Bayesian Optimization and provide practical guidance for surrogate selection under limited computational and experimental budgets.