Retail theft costs the global economy over $100 billion annually, yet existing AI-based detection systems require expensive custom model training on proprietary datasets and charge $200-500/month per store. We present Paza, a zero-shot retail theft detection framework that achieves practical concealment detection without training any model. Our approach orchestrates multiple existing models in a layered pipeline - cheap object detection and pose estimation running continuously, with an expensive vision-language model (VLM) invoked only when behavioral pre-filters trigger. A multi-signal suspicion pre-filter (requiring dwell time plus at least one behavioral signal) reduces VLM invocations by 240x compared to per-frame analysis, bounding calls to <=10/minute and enabling a single GPU to serve 10-20 stores. The architecture is model-agnostic: the VLM component accepts any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, enabling operators to swap between models such as Gemma 4, Qwen3.5-Omni, GPT-4o, or future releases without code changes - ensuring the system improves as the VLM landscape evolves. We evaluate the VLM component on the DCSASS synthesized shoplifting dataset (169 clips, controlled environment), achieving 89.5% precision and 92.8% specificity at 59.3% recall zero-shot - where the recall gap is attributable to sparse frame sampling in offline evaluation rather than VLM reasoning failures, as precision and specificity are the operationally critical metrics determining false alarm rates. We present a detailed cost model showing viability at $50-100/month per store (3-10x cheaper than commercial alternatives), and introduce a privacy-preserving design that obfuscates faces in the detection pipeline. The source code is available at https://github.com/xHaileab/Paza-AI.
Benefiting from generalizability of vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP, many zero-/few-shot anomaly detection (AD) approaches have achieved impressive detection performance across various datasets. Nevertheless, they require substantial training on large auxiliary datasets to adapt VLMs to anomaly detection, and their inference largely relies on visual-text embedding similarity-based anomaly scores, lacking reasoning abilities to detect complex anomalies that require in-depth contextual understanding. To address this limitation, we propose \textbf{AnomalyAgent}, a novel training-free, agentic framework that leverages the advanced reasoning and generalization capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for anomaly detection. The key ingredients include \textbf{1)} a comprehensive anomaly-centric toolset that enables adaptive MLLM-driven, agentic anomaly reasoning in zero-shot settings, and \textbf{2)} a customized memory module that grounds anomaly reasoning with few-shot, in-context reference examples. We extend evaluation beyond the detection of simple anomalies (e.g., surface defects like cracks and dents and clear lesions) in widely used benchmarks to more diverse types of anomalies such as logical/contextual anomalies in logistics and manufacturing settings. Extensive experiment results demonstrate that our AnomalyAgent achieves substantially better performance compared to training-free VLM-based AD and generic agentic methods, highlighting its superior generalization capability in both zero-shot and few-shot anomaly detection settings. The code implementation can be find at this address.
A marketplace review photograph is a document: platforms approve refunds on it, and generative models drove the cost of forging one to zero. We study that detection problem, so we build a detector and attach an attribution map as its evidence, then measure what that pair delivers on 186,527 images under controls designed to change our conclusions when something is wrong. Compression history, not synthesis, drives naive evaluation: our strongest model reaches 0.9999 PR-AUC (area under the precision-recall curve) on a product-disjoint split, yet falls to 0.7254 once we re-encode synthetics into the real class's format, while five public detectors move by at most 0.07. Aligning one class relocates the cue rather than removing it, and the repaired model then assigns native files a median probability of synthesis of 0.0004. One identical final encode for both classes repairs that, and a three-seed factorial credits the encoding change with the whole gain (+0.176 +- 0.009 PR-AUC). That encode equalises the last stage only: forensic features alone still separate the classes at 0.7145 against a base rate of 0.254. For evidence we test maps causally, against controls that never consult the detector. Whether an attribution ranking exists at all depends on whether the detector reacts to the image. On our first-fix detector, which calls 96 of 100 edited frames real, no map beats a random one. On the detector we selected, twelve of seventeen maps clear that control on edited images and eight on generated ones; perturbation leads both axes and no gradient-CAM variant shows a positive advantage. The trivial controls never clear it, and on generated images the centre prior is worse than random. Our ensembled regional map clears both axes and takes the top pixel AP at 12.4 s per map against 44.9 for occlusion. Clearing a detector-blind control is not yet a faithful explanation, and we demonstrate none.
Leonid Kuturin, Ilya Sotnikov, Mark Khusnutdinov +4
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved impressive results on general vision-language tasks, yet they suffer from hallucination, imprecise localization, and prohibitive computational cost when applied to dedicated OCR scenarios. This paper presents PP-OCRv6, a lightweight OCR system that combines architectural innovation with data-centric optimization. PP-OCRv6 redesigns the backbone, detection neck, and recognition neck around a unified MetaFormer-style building block with structural reparameterization, decoupling spatial token mixing from channel mixing and supporting both tasks through task-specific stride configurations. Three model tiers (medium, small, tiny) share the same block primitives, covering deployment scenarios from server to edge. On our in-house benchmarks, PP-OCRv6_medium achieves 83.2% recognition accuracy and 86.2% detection Hmean, outperforming PP-OCRv5_server by +5.1% and +4.6% respectively while surpassing Qwen3-VL-235B, GPT-5.5, and Gemini-3.1-Pro with orders of magnitude fewer parameters. The tiny tier achieves 3.9× faster inference than PP-OCRv5_mobile on Intel Xeon CPU while maintaining comparable accuracy.