Scalable Algorithms with Provable Optimality Bounds for the Multiple Watchman Route Problem

Many research fields share a common structure: a set of agents, each pursuing its own goal, whose actions must be coordinated so that no two of them conflict. Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is a concrete instance of this structure, with applications from warehouses to road traffic and airports. Much of MAPF research assumes discrete time, circular agents sharing one spatial graph, a single goal per agent, and that an agent must remain at its goal once reached, precluding heterogeneous fleets, non-geometric conflicts, task sequences, and agents that move on after completing them. We generalise the MAPF formulation to lift these assumptions, and present Anytime-Optimal Continuous-time Conflict-Based Search (AOC-CBS), an exact and solution-complete solver for it. AOC-CBS guarantees the eventual return of an optimal solution, while reporting an incumbent with a known optimality gap upper bound throughout its runtime; it is configurable with a portfolio of repair functions, one of which we introduce (Tier-Prioritized Safe Interval Path Planning), and can exploit multiple processor cores. We demonstrate AOC-CBS on a mixed fleet of non-convex agents moving along smooth, kinodynamically feasible trajectories. Preliminary experiments against the exact solver OC-CBS, on well-known benchmarks and roadmaps we sample from them, show AOC-CBS is comparable at finding optimal solutions while extending scalability from the tens to the hundreds of agents when a bounded optimality gap is accepted.

Multi-Agent Route Planning considers selecting vehicles, each associated with a single predefined route, such that route-level coverage utility is maximized while redundant spatial overlaps are limited. This paper gives a formal problem definition, proves NP-hardness by reduction from the Weighted Set Packing problem, and derives a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization formulation whose coefficients directly encode route utility rewards and pairwise overlap penalties. A single penalty parameter $λ$ controls the coverage--overlap trade-off. We distinguish between a soft regime, which supports multi-objective exploration, and a hard regime, in which the penalty is strong enough to effectively enforce near-disjoint routes. We describe a practical pipeline for generating city instances, constructing candidate routes, building the QUBO matrix, and solving it with a binary quadratic programming baseline (Gurobi), simulated annealing, and D-Wave hybrid quantum annealing. Experiments on Barcelona instances with up to $10{,}000$ vehicles reveal a clear coverage--overlap knee and show that Pareto-optimal solutions are mainly obtained under the hard-penalty regime, while D-Wave hybrid solvers and Gurobi achieve very similar objective values on matching configurations with only minor runtime differences as problem size grows.

We study unlabeled MRMP for unit-disk robots in a polygonal environment. Although the problem is hard in general, polynomial-time solutions exist under appropriate separation assumptions on start and target positions. Banyassady et al.(SoCG'22) guarantee feasibility in simple polygons under start--start and target--target distances of at least $4$, and start--target distances of at least $3$, but without optimality guarantees. Solovey et al.(RSS'15) provide a near-optimal solution in general polygonal domains, under stricter conditions: start/target positions must have pairwise distance at least $4$, and at least $\sqrt{5}\approx2.236$ from obstacles. This raises the question of whether polynomial-time algorithms can be obtained in even more densely packed environments. In this paper we present a generalized algorithm that achieve different tradeoffs on the robots-separation $ρ$ and obstacles-separation $ω$, all significantly improving upon the state of the art. Specifically, we obtain polynomial-time constant-approximation algorithms to minimize the total path length when (i) $ρ=2\frac{2}{3}$ and $ω=1\frac{2}{3}$, or (ii) $ρ\approx3.291$ and $ω\approx1.354$. These solutions are weakly-monotone; we also provide a monotone solution requiring $ω=\approx1.614$ and $ρ=4$. We prove that monotone plans may not exist when $ω<1.614$, and weakly-monotone plans may not exist when $ω<1.354$. We then present tradeoffs between the separation bounds and the approximation factor, specifically achieving an (almost) optimal bound of $ρ=2$ at the cost of a linear approximation factor and requiring $ω=2$. This applies also for the labeled variant of MRMP, in which case we show a tight bound on $ω$. Finally, we show that without any robots-separation assumption, obstacles-separation of at least $1.5$ may be necessary for a solution to exist.