LASER: Low-Rank Activation SVD for Efficient Recursion

Vision-language models (VLMs) deliver strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, but their large computational cost and high parameter counts make deployment challenging on resource-constrained devices. Low-rank decomposition has emerged as a promising compression technique, yet existing methods often optimize local matrix reconstruction error, rely on uniform or heuristic rank allocation, and focus mainly on attention projections while leaving feed-forward networks underexplored. In this paper, we propose~\textit{LASER} (\textbf{L}oss-\textbf{A}ware \textbf{S}ingular-value d\textbf{E}composition and \textbf{R}ank allocation), a low-rank compression framework for efficient low-precision VLM inference. LASER derives a curvature-weighted SVD objective from a second-order approximation of the model loss and uses Kronecker-factored Fisher information to guide decomposition toward downstream performance rather than reconstruction alone. We further introduce a loss-aware cross-layer rank allocation strategy based on calibration gradients, enabling more effective parameter budgeting across layers. Finally, we extend low-rank compression to FFN layers through a hybrid scheme that combines SVD with quantization. The evaluation results show that LASER achieves more than $2.3\times$ decoding speedup over previous work while preserving strong accuracy under low-precision inference.

Recursive reasoning models can solve complex structured tasks with only a few million parameters by repeatedly updating a latent state. Deploying these models on edge hardware requires significant compression, but unlike conventional sequence models, quantization errors compound across recursive reasoning cycles rather than across output tokens. As a result, standard intuitions about compression fail to apply. In this work, we ask what survives when recursive reasoners are compressed. Across a full precision sweep, three tasks, and two recursive architectures, we find that aggressive compression preserves local prediction but destroys global reasoning: cell accuracy holds while puzzle-exact accuracy collapses to zero under naive INT4 pruning, distillation, and linear attention alike. Token-level objectives, including quantization-aware training, cannot repair it. The collapse is architectural -- it strikes MLP-mixing recursion but not attention on the same task -- and we reverse it with per-channel calibrated INT4 without retraining. We also introduce carry-trajectory fidelity, the cosine similarity to the full-precision reasoning path, as a label-free signal that predicts this damage and its recovery before a task evaluation. The combined result is a deployment recipe: flash-streamed embeddings remove a 99.4MB bottleneck, INT8 at one cycle matches full-depth accuracy at 6x fewer FLOPs (8MB SoC), and calibrated INT4 fits a 4MB microcontroller.

In streaming tasks, recurrent models can carry latent computation across time, allowing each update to build on representations produced earlier. This raises a basic question: once temporal recurrence provides sequential computation across steps, how much depth is still needed within each step? Prior work has shown that recurrence can make shallow models competitive. We instead study this question as a compute-allocation problem, varying within-step depth, expert width, and the number of parallel experts per layer across several compute budgets. For each budget, we compare the best observed recurrent and non-recurrent allocations and the performance they achieve under approximately matched per-step computation. Across Sokoban and autoregressive FineWeb language modeling, we find that temporal recurrence shifts the best observed compute allocation toward substantially fewer layers, with comparable or better performance.