physics.soc-phApr 23, 2026

Audio Video Verbal Analysis (AVVA) for Capturing Classroom Dialogues

Authors: Vivek UpadhyayAmaresh Chakrabarti

Organizations: aDepartment of Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India

Abstract

Background: The classroom discourse analysis has been transformed by the growing use of audio-video multimodal data, which demands analytical methods that balance interpretive depth with computational scalability. Methods: This study introduces the Audio Video Verbal Analysis (AVVA) framework, adapted from the Verbal Analysis method to integrate qualitative interpretation with quantitative modelling. Unlike fully multimodal learning analytics approaches, AVVA focuses on verbatim transcripts with essential interactional modalities. Findings: The framework embeds triangulation as a core design strategy across ten methodological steps, strengthening validity and analytical rigour. A comprehensive validation scheme addresses fundamental challenges in temporal observational research: Phi Ceiling for low-frequency variables (via Base Rate Filtering), estimation uncertainty (via bootstrap confidence intervals), and the Modifiable Temporal Unit Problem, where measured associations depend on observational window size. Four-criterion stability assessment (sign consistency, confidence interval overlap, zero exclusion, magnitude stability) classifies variable pairs into interpretable patterns: grain-invariant, scale-specific, or multi-scale, etc. structures across temporal grain sizes. Its application to 23 hours of classroom recordings illustrates its practical viability and its potential to yield meaningful insights. Contribution: The framework thus provides a scalable pathway for transforming rich classroom discourse into analysable datasets.

Explore similar work

Apr 30, 2026cs.AI

Mapping the Methodological Space of Classroom Interaction Research: Scale, Duration, and Modality in an Age of AI

Research on classroom interaction has long been divided between large-scale observation and in-depth ethnographic work. We propose a framework mapping this methodological space along three dimensions--scale, duration, and modality--where a study's position shapes what it reveals and obscures. We illustrate it through contrasting studies of dialogic teaching--Howe et al. (2019) and Snell and Lefstein (2018)--and an interview with the lead researchers, organized around three questions: what can be operationalized, what mechanisms become visible, and what translates to practice. We then examine how AI is expanding this space and how the framework can guide research and tool design.
Dorottya Demszky, Edith Bouton, Alison Twiner +2
May 29, 2026cs.CL

TeachObs: A Human-Validated Benchmark for Multimodal Teaching Observation and Model Evaluation

Classroom videos contain observable teaching practices, but their pedagogical and visual signals are rarely organized in forms suitable for model evaluation. We present \textit{TeachObs}, a human-validated benchmark for multimodal teaching observation in classroom videos. \textit{TeachObs} includes 30 public lesson videos from eight countries divided into 5,158 fixed 15-second scenes. Seven researchers annotated each scene with 39 binary observation codes, covering 20 visual codes, such as gesture, board work, pointing, and visual materials, and 19 nonvisual codes, such as instruction, monitoring, questioning, feedback, and reflection. Gold segment labels are constructed using reliability- and prevalence-aware rules based on Krippendorff's alpha. In addition to segment-level labels, three expert raters produced lesson-level ratings and qualitative evaluations of instructional design, instructional delivery, learner response, learning materials, and lesson closure across the 30 lessons, with rater coverage detailed in the body. Using these two human reference layers, we evaluate five vision-capable frontier LLMs across three tracks - text-only segment coding, text + frame segment coding, and lesson-level coverage scored under an LLM-as-judge protocol - and find that no single model consistently outperforms others across all three tracks, that adding a mid-frame inflates both true and false attributions per scene, and that model evaluations over-rate procedurally clear lessons relative to expert raters. \textit{TeachObs} therefore supports both fine-grained annotation benchmarking and whole-lesson evaluation, showing where AI systems can assist classroom video analysis and where expert judgment remains necessary across varied subjects, classroom formats, and annotation difficulty levels.
Yeil Jeong, Youngjin Yoo, Jiyoung Bae +5
Jun 10, 2026cs.SD

Multimodal Speaker Identification in Classroom Environments

Automated analysis of K-12 classroom dynamics faces challenges due to background noise and variable child speech, often confounding acoustic-only models. This study evaluates a multimodal speaker identification framework anchoring acoustic embeddings with LLM-derived semantic context. Using a subset of the EDSI dataset (8 math classrooms, N = 2,801 utterances), we found an acoustic baseline (ECAPA-TDNN) achieved only 39.0% accuracy. By integrating transcript-based "contextual anchoring" into a gradient boosting classifier, our multimodal approach raised student identification to 50.3%. Performance also improved for utterances over 5 seconds, reaching 76.9% accuracy (vs. 64.9% baseline) with a 90.9% Top-3 accuracy. Additionally, the model distinguished teacher vs. student roles with 99.3% accuracy. This approach advances the feasibility of automated feedback systems capable of considering individual student participation, a crucial step for supporting equitable instruction at scale.
Michael L. Chrzan, Meghavarshini Krishnaswamy, Robert Gibboni +3