Multi-Stage Bi-Atrial Segmentation Framework from 3D Late Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI using V-Net Family Models

Foundation models have shown strong transferability in cardiac MRI (CMR), but their effectiveness for heterogeneous multi-view and multi-sequence CMR analysis remains unclear. In this work, we explore the effectiveness of fine-tuning and combining different CMR foundation models for the Universal Multi-Sequence, Multi-Center and Multi-View CMR Segmentation (CMR-Multi) Challenge. CineMA was fine-tuned for cine and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) segmentation across short-axis and long-axis views. For direct left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation, we used two recent frozen CMR foundation models to extract embedding vectors that were then combined using attention-based multiple-instance learning for LVEF regression. In the challenge validation set, cine segmentation achieved Dice scores of 0.862, 0.883, and 0.902 for short-axis, two-chamber and four-chamber cine MRI, respectively. LGE segmentation achieved Dice scores between 0.621 and 0.846 across views. The direct LVEF regression model achieved an MAE of 4.96 percentage points and a Pearson correlation of 0.91. These results indicate that foundation models can be effectively adapted and combined for multi-view CMR analysis, while accurate LGE scar segmentation remains a challenging task.

Automatic cardiac image segmentation is pivotal for diagnosing and treating cardiac diseases. In this work, we introduce MCSeg, a volumetric transformer-based network tailored for multi-modal cardiac segmentation. To overcome the architectural mismatch inherent in existing hybrid networks, we propose a novel Scaling Feature Pyramid (SFP). Unlike conventional skip connections, the SFP effectively bridges the single-scale 3D Vision Transformer (ViT) encoder and the multi-scale CNN decoder by transforming the ViT's output into a hierarchical feature pyramid, ensuring that global contextual information is effectively leveraged. For the training paradigm, the ViT encoder first undergoes self-supervised pre-training via masked image modeling. Subsequently, the network is fine-tuned on downstream tasks, during which a regional mutual information (RMI) loss is integrated to improve boundary segmentation accuracy. In experiments, MCSeg consistently outperforms eleven SOTA methods on CT dataset ImageCHD, multi-modal dataset MM-WHS, MRI dataset HVSMR-2.0 and MSD Heart, highlighting the effectiveness of our MCSeg for multi-modal cardiac segmentation tasks. Furthermore, MCSeg's superior performance in few-shot experiment showcases its significant potential in adapting to limited data scenarios. Codes and pre-trained ViT-B weights are open-sourced at https://openi.pcl.ac.cn/OpenMedIA/MCSeg

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and challenges of heart chamber segmentation from non-contrast CT scans using contrastive unpaired image translation and deep learning-based segmentation. Approach: We developed ChameleonNet, a framework utilizing the Contrastive Unpaired Translation (CUT) network with decoupled contrastive learning (DCL) loss to synthesize non-contrast CT from contrast CT scans. Using annotations of four heart chambers (left atrium (LA), left ventricle (LV), right atrium (RA), and right ventricle (RV)) from contrast scans, we trained a Hausdorff distance loss-enhanced nnU-Net on synthesized non-contrast images. The translation model was trained with 35,538 contrast-enhanced and 37,197 non-contrast CT slices. The segmentation model was trained with 292 synthesized non-contrast scans. Performance was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th Hausdorff distance (HD95) on 36 synthesized non-contrast scans, and volume agreement on 36 real non-contrast CT scans was assessed using Pearson correlation, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean percentage error (MPE). Results: The segmentation model achieved DSC of 0.94 (0.01), 0.91 (0.04), 0.92 (0.03), 0.93 (0.02), and HD95 of 3.63 (1.49), 5.74 (4.08), 5.18 (1.77), 5.51 (3.21) mm on synthesized non-contrast images for LA, LV, RA, and RV, respectively. On real non-contrast CT scans, Pearson correlations were 0.93, 0.82, 0.87, and 0.89 (all p<0.001), with MAPE ranging from 9.22% to 20.79%, and MPE ranging from -12.52% to 4.67%. Conclusions: ChameleonNet demonstrated feasibility for heart chamber segmentation from non-contrast CT without manual non-contrast annotations. However, volume errors, particularly for LV and RV, indicate that further refinement and validation are needed before clinical use.