cs.CYApr 3, 2026

Can AI be a moral victim? The role of moral patiency and ownership perceptions in ethical judgments of using AI-generated content

Authors: Hyesun Choung, Soojong Kim

Organizations: Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA · Department of Communication, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

Abstract

The growing use of generative AI raises ethical concerns about authorship and plagiarism. This study examines how people judge the reuse of AI-generated content, focusing on moral patiency and ownership perceptions. In an experiment, participants evaluated two substantively similar manuscripts in which the original source was described as authored by a human, an AI system, or an AI agent with a human-like name. Results showed that copying AI-generated work was judged less unethical, less plagiaristic, and less guilt-inducing than copying human-authored work. Mediation analyses revealed that this leniency stemmed from lower perceptions of AI's capacity to suffer harm (moral patiency) and greater ownership attributed to the human writer reusing AI-generated content. Anthropomorphic cues shaped moral evaluations indirectly by reducing perceived ownership. These findings shed light on how people morally disengage when using AI-generated work and highlight differences in how ethical judgments are applied to human versus AI-created content.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. When AI Blurs the Boundaries of Contribution: An Empirical Study of Authorship Calibration

    Jul 16, 2026Célina Treuillier, Denis LalanneGenerative AI in EducationHuman-AI Co-Creation

  2. Struggle Premium : How Human Effort and Imperfection Drive Perceived Value in the Age of AI

    Mar 4, 2026Nazneen Sultana, Mst Rafia Islam, Md. Tanvir Hossain +1Generative AI EvaluationHuman Preference Evaluation

  3. Do Consumers Accept AIs as Moral Compliance Agents?

    Mar 23, 2026Greg Nyilasy, Abraham Ryan Ade Putra Hito, Jennifer Overbeck +2Trust in AIResponsible AI