Humor is a fundamental cognitive phenomenon in which humans derive pleasure from the expectation violations and their resolution, exemplifying the brain's dynamic capacity for predictive processing. Classical humor theories emphasize semantic incongruity as the primary driver of amusement, yet overlook temporal dynamics despite comedians' intuition that "timing is everything." The extent to which temporal structure contributes to humor appreciation and how it interacts with semantic content remains poorly understood. Here, we propose the Dual Prediction Violation (DPV) framework to capture the interplay between content and timing. By analyzing 828 professional Chinese stand-up performances, we show that temporal features substantially outweigh semantic incongruity in predicting audience appreciation. Specifically, we find that peak semantic violations matter more than average incongruity levels, and pauses systematically lengthen before high-surprise punchlines--a strategic coupling that distinguishes successful from unsuccessful performances. These findings reframe humor as temporally scaffolded, where timing and semantic content operate in strategic coordination rather than independently. Our DPV framework bridges humor theory with predictive processing, demonstrating that temporal structure plays a central role in naturalistic humor appreciation with implications for understanding multi-scale prediction integration in linguistic processing.
Humor is one of the few cognitive tasks where getting the reasoning right matters as much as getting the answer right. While recent work evaluates humor understanding on benchmarks such as the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest (NYCC), it largely treats it as black-box prediction, overlooking the structured reasoning processes underlying humor comprehension. We introduce IRS (Incongruity-Resolution Supervision), a framework that decomposes humor understanding into three components: Incongruity Modeling, which identifies mismatches in the visual scene; Resolution Modeling, which constructs coherent reinterpretations of these mismatches; and Preference Alignment, which evaluates candidate interpretations under human judgments. Grounded in incongruity-resolution theory and expert captionist practice, IRS supervises intermediate reasoning process through structured traces that make the path from visual perception to humorous interpretation explicit and learnable. Across 7B, 32B, and 72B models on NYCC, IRS improves performance across caption matching and ranking, with IRS-72B achieving the strongest model performance on ranking (76.10%), surpassing both non-expert human performance and all evaluated open- and closed-source multimodal baselines. Zero-shot transfer further shows that IRS learns generalizable reasoning patterns.
Annotators routinely disagree on laughter boundaries and subtle chuckles, yet temporal laughter localization typically evaluates against a single reference annotation. We show that this disagreement is structured rather than random noise. Re-annotating the SMILE-Temporal benchmark (672 videos, 1,683 events) with 3-5 annotators per video (alpha = 0.757), we find systematic patterns: disagreement is 1.73 times larger at offsets than onsets, far more common for chuckles than full laughs (77% vs. 20%), and predictable from event attributes (AUC = 0.831). Evaluating against a single annotator breaks down under this structure: system scores shift by 0.246 F1 depending on the chosen ground truth, correctly ranking systems only 69.7% of the time (vs. 80% against all annotators). We propose a disagreement-calibrated evaluation that scores predictions against the full annotator distribution using conformally calibrated tolerance bands (wider at offsets, 0.727s, than onsets, 0.5s). The per-annotator annotations and analysis code are available at https://github.com/WSCSports/MTLLFM-temporal-laughter-localization.
Detecting laughter in video is essential for affective computing and narrative understanding, yet existing approaches treat it as coarse clip-level classification, failing to capture precise temporal boundaries of brief, transient laughter events. We address this gap with two complementary contributions. First, we introduce UR-FUNNY-Temporal and SMILE-Temporal, fully annotated temporal laughter datasets extending two widely-used humor benchmarks. Our annotations cover over 11,053 videos (78.8 hours) and provide precise onset/offset boundaries for each laughter event, along with rich metadata distinguishing speaker vs. audience laughter, modality dominance (acoustic, visual, or both), and intensity levels. Second, we propose a lightweight weakly-supervised framework for temporal laughter localization. Our architecture combines fixed HuBERT and MAE encoders with temporal softmax pooling and adaptive modality gating, learning fine-grained temporal grounding from clip-level labels without requiring frame-level annotations during training. Experiments across three datasets demonstrate that our approach substantially outperforms multimodal foundation models including Gemini 3 Flash, achieving 99% F1 and 68.1% localization precision on sports broadcast data. Ablations validate each architectural component. Furthermore, our precise temporal tags improve downstream laughter reasoning by 227% on CIDEr, enabling GPT-3.5 to outperform GPT-4o. The code, UR-FUNNY-Temporal and SMILE-Temporal datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/WSCSports/MTLLFM-temporal-laughter-localization.