Organizations: College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110016, China
Abstract
We tested whether auditory-evoked EEG supports subject-independent five-vowel perception decoding when trial identity, model identity, prediction provenance, and participant-level inference are controlled within a single benchmark. We reconstructed Study 2 event tables from OpenNeuro ds006104 version 1.0.1 and analysed the consonant-vowel pair task. One-to-one marker-stimulus pairing yielded 3,840 independent trials; control-condition selection and artifact rejection retained 1,094 epochs from 16 participants and 61 EEG channels. Thirteen unique implementations were evaluated using leave-one-subject-out testing, with participant metrics reconstructed from 36,102 trial predictions across 33 complete prediction replicas. Random Forest was numerically highest at 21.474% balanced accuracy (95% participant-bootstrap interval, 19.526-23.482%; chance, 20%), but neither its participant-level tests nor any implementation survived correction across the 13-model family. Deep-model performance was close to chance, and several architectures showed substantial seed-dependent variation and low trial-label agreement. An exploratory MDM analysis comprising 9,616 genuine refits across training cohorts of 3-15 participants showed no monotonic performance gain. Within this dataset and protocol, evidence for reliable cross-subject five-vowel decoding is limited. The benchmark provides a reproducible chain from source rows to retained epochs, predictions, participant-level metrics, multiplicity-adjusted inference, and bounded diagnostic analyses.
Decoding speech information directly from scalp electroencephalography (EEG) into text provides a potential non-invasive neural communication pathway for individuals with severe speech and motor impairments. Compared with invasive approaches such as electrocorticography, EEG is safer and more widely deployable, yet substantially more challenging to decode.This challenge is exacerbated for Chinese sentence decoding, which must handle a high-dimensional output space with thousands of characters, severe inter-subject variability, and low signal-to-noise ratios for text alignment.Existing methods commit to a single supervisory axis---either text semantics or audio acoustic features---yet neither can simultaneously satisfy the demands of sentence-level discriminability and fine-grained temporal resolution required for large-vocabulary Chinese decoding. We introduce EEGAlign, a novel parameter-efficient framework that jointly aligns EEG with two axes---text alignment with BGE-M3 text embeddings and audio alignment with wav2vec~2.0 speech features via contrastive learning followed by CTC character-sequence decoding. On ChineseEEG-2 data, EEGAlign yields state-of-the-art closed-set sentence classification performance, reaching up to 82.37% Top-1 accuracy on Reading Aloud EEG and 41.43% on Passive Listening EEG out of 101 candidates. Ablation studies show that the two alignment axes are highly complementary: combining them yields consistently better performance than either alone. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on decoding large-vocabulary Chinese sentences from non-invasive EEG during overt speech production, and achieving strong classification performance with relatively large closed-set candidate-sentence setting.
EEG foundation models pretrained on thousands of hours have shown large gains over task-specific networks for motor imagery, seizure detection, sleep staging, and emotion recognition, but their transfer to speech decoding - arguably the most demanding non-invasive BCI application - remains untested. We present the first systematic benchmark of EEG foundation models against strong convolutional baselines for speech decoding, using two corpora: UGR-MINDVOICE (overt and covert Iberian Spanish) and BCI Competition 2020 Track 3 (imagined speech). We compare two foundation models (LaBraM, EEGMamba) against three established baselines (EEGNet, ShallowFBCSPNet, EEGConformer) under a unified preprocessing and fine-tuning protocol. Large-scale EEG pretraining yields no consistent advantage over a 16K-parameter CNN on speech tasks, indicating that current general-purpose EEG pretraining does not yet transfer to speech production and motivating speech-specific foundation models.
Owais Mujtaba Khanday, Mohamed Baha Ben Ticha, Sanae Belfrouh +2
Pretrained EEG foundation models are proposed for clinical decoding, but whether reported gains transfer across populations or survive negative controls is unclear. We benchmark LaBraM, EEGMamba, CBraMod, REVE, LEAD, BENDR, and BIOT on five clinical tasks across four datasets. Primary analyses use frozen linear probes with subject-disjoint LOSO or grouped five-fold validation. Because CAUEEG releases no patient identifiers, it is evaluated at recording level with a patient-disjoint sensitivity. We challenge apparent gains using stronger classical comparators, label permutation, scrambled-label fine-tuning, and random-initialisation controls. In a matched 19-channel CAUEEG evaluation (Normal/MCI/Dementia; N = 1,187 recordings), classical features achieve 0.734 macro-AUROC versus 0.699 for BIOT, 0.669 for CBraMod, and 0.568 for REVE. A patient-disjoint sensitivity retains the classical-over-REVE ordering (0.717 versus 0.565). Dataset identity is decoded from frozen REVE embeddings at or near ceiling across Western-Korean and Western-Western pairs, including after PCA-50 and removal of line-frequency and amplitude-scale information. This establishes dataset membership, not a causal site or population effect. A matched random-initialised encoder exceeds pretrained REVE on CAUEEG (0.659 versus 0.570). On CHB-MIT cross-subject ictal detection (n = 23), REVE reaches 0.793, versus 0.739 for the best enhanced nonlinear comparator, 0.701 for random initialisation, and 0.505 for raw-signal random features. Because preprocessing removes absolute amplitude, this does not establish superiority over every plausible handcrafted baseline. Conclusions change materially after montage matching, patient-overlap checks, stronger comparators, and representation controls. We distill these checks into a reporting protocol for clinical EEG foundation-model studies.